ipl-logo

Justifiable Vehicle Search

625 Words3 Pages

Vehicle searches are relatively new considering the rest of the laws that have been around since the beginning. There are a lot of rules that come into play to have a justifiable vehicle search. Each state also has their own personal laws in regards to vehicle searches as well. It is a tricky law, just like many others when it comes to what is considered a lawful search.
After a traffic stop, a lawful vehicle search may take place, but to perform a lawful vehicle search one of the following circumstances must occur. The driver has given consent to the officer to search the vehicle being the most lawful search. The officer has probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime inside the vehicle such as stolen goods. Another is if the driver is arrested and the search is related to the arrest such as illegal drugs. And if the officer reasonably believes that their own safety is in danger they can search the vehicle for example a hidden weapon. …show more content…

Like in the case Arizona v. Gant (2009) which states that “Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle contains evidence of a criminal activity, an officer may lawfully search any area of the vehicle in which the evidence might be found.” The reason this case applies to the current situation is because Officer Bird felt that her safety was in danger due to a revolver she saw under the front seat. Arizona v Johnson (2009) another major case which states “An officer may conduct a pat-down of the driver and passengers during a lawful traffic stop; the police need not believe that any occupant of the vehicle is involved in a criminal activity.” This relates to Officer Bird’s case because she performed a weapons pat-down on the man, even though she did not believe he was involved in criminal

Show More
Related

Chimel Vs. California Case Study

455 Words | 2 Pages

They have also said that it is reasonable for any officer to do an immediate area search of where that individual is to make sure that they can not grab anything for a weapon like for example a knife. The Supreme Court clearly notes in its opinion that such searches have to happen in the immediate area of arrest and any such search outside that area must be made with a search warrant. In Chimel case the officers could have patted down Chimel and then done a search of the immediate area to make sure that no weapons were hiding around. But once they began looking all around the house that requires a search warrant. The Supreme Court reversed the California Supreme Court’s

Read More

The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief

510 Words | 3 Pages

United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) Capsule Summary: Seizing a person’s luggage for an extended period until a warrant is obtained violates the Fourth Amendment as beyond the limits of a Terry stop, but, a sniff by a narcotics dog does not constitute a search for Fourth Amendment purposes. Facts: The respondent Raymond Place was stopped by Federal Agents (DEA) upon his arrival into LaGuardia Airport on a Friday afternoon. The respondent refused to consent to the search of his luggage. His luggage was seized by the agents under suspicion they contained narcotics. The respondent was informed the agents would be obtaining a search warrant from a judge.

Read More

Case Study Of Ybarra Vs. Illinois

644 Words | 3 Pages

Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1969)) • The officer who conducted search on Ybarra provided no evidence that he believe he was armed and dangerous , the search of Ybarra was a violation of his constitutional rights and the decision of the lower courts were reversed • The decision was majority 6 justices to 3, the dissenting opinions were from Justice Rehnquist , Justice Blackmun and Justice Burger they argued that the search of the bar was necessary and the case presented a different set of circumstances to the Terry v Ohio suspicion standard stating that an officer is in more danger executing a warrant than making a standard police stop on the

Read More

Sibro Vs New York Case Summary

1102 Words | 5 Pages

“A stop involves only a temporary interference with a person’s liberty” ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). If the officer finds anything on the person during the frisk, then they officer can make an arrest, otherwise, the person is released ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). The New York “stop and frisk” law says “police officer may stop any person... in a public place whom he reasonably suspects are committing crimes and may demand… his name, address and an explanation of his actions," and when the officer "suspects that he is in danger…he may search such person for a dangerous weapon" ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). In this case, Officer Martin, used the fact of knowing Sibron was associating himself with narcotic addicts as probable cause and reasonable suspicion; but it is not justifiable under the Fourth

Read More

Dwight Dexter Upheld In The United States Criminal Justice System

625 Words | 3 Pages

The Fourth Amendment clearly states that the police must have a warrant to search a someone’s home and personal belongings. Though the police had probable cause, the murder they intended to find could not be located in Mr. Dexter’s car. The police and investigators searched Mr. Dexter’s car without obtaining a search warrant because they did not have enough time to get one. In the car they found a gun that did not relate to the

Read More

Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief

584 Words | 3 Pages

This leads to some states including Virginia, penalizing illegal search and

Read More

Race Relations Worksheet

390 Words | 2 Pages

The true reason for the stop was to make sure that no robberies happened that night and to arrest the defendant if there was evidence that he might commit a robbery. 2. In Whren v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held that as long as the officers have reasonable cause to stop a vehicle than any search and seizure of illegal items in the vehicle

Read More

Compare And Contrast Arizona Vs Gant

487 Words | 2 Pages

The Arizona v. Gant case is very interesting. Gant also had a gun in the car. I’m assuming Gant didn’t consent to the search, even though I don’t see any of that mentioned in the case. Normally, police officers ask if they can search your car. I’m a bit confused though.

Read More

Examples Of Exceptions To The Fourth Amendment

153 Words | 1 Pages

Several exceptions to the Fourth amendment have been made over the past several decades, with some being understandable and others being questionable. Consenting to a search results in not needing a warrant, though this poses many exceptions and complications, i.e. the scope of the consent given, whether consent is voluntarily specified, or whether a person has the right to consent to a search of another's property. Another understandable exception is the “plain view” doctrine, where an officer (acting in legal presence) can seize plain view objects. The stipulation to this is that the officer must have had probable clause that the objects seized are contraband. Exigent circumstances, where it would be harmful or impractical to obtain a warrant

Read More

4th Amendment Essay On Warrants

906 Words | 4 Pages

Two additional times police do not need warrants are during hot pursuit and in plain view. Hot pursuit is when a law official is chasing a criminal and the criminal runs onto private property. The police can also take any evidence found during the chase. In plain view means cops can take any evidence in plain view as long as the police are where they can legally

Read More

Officer Gung Ho Case Summary

991 Words | 4 Pages

Robinette 519 U.S. 33 (1996) case, the court ruled that the fourth amendment search to valid consent is that the consent be voluntary and voluntariness is a question of fact to be determined from all the circumstances. The issue with Officer Gung Ho is that he was in a police uniform, yelling for Dan to stop, this alone can be an intimidation factor, and now Ho is asking to search Dan’s bag. Dan may not know he can refuse the right for Officer Ho to search his bag because the officer does not have probable cause to search his bag in the first place. Therefore any evidence found in the bag could be suppressed in court and in the violation on his fourth amendment

Read More

Sto Stop And Frisk: Preventing Racial Profiling By Police

260 Words | 2 Pages

So, then the officer will go and ask them questions and then feel around the person’s outer garments such as pants, waist, by the sock area, jacket (if worn at time) only to check for a concealed weapon and/or contraband. Never should the officer go inside the person’s pockets, shoe, or their pants. Stop and frisk is one of the most controversial police procedures that there are. This is a limited search that should only be performed when an officer has reasonable suspicions on a suspect. The American courts adopted stop and frisk from the British command

Read More

Institutional Racism In The Criminal Justice System

988 Words | 4 Pages

The Section One of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, similarly, allows to stop and search for any prohibited items as such, however, this act allows the police to search however, only if there are reasonable grounds for suspicion for possession of those

Read More

Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

493 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

796 Words | 4 Pages

An officer may only be allowed to search a person 's personal belongings if their reasoning is associated with a lawful arrest and if they have a probable cause to search (Matthews). After it being a huge deal in New York, other cities and states began embracing the use of stop-and-frisk as it began growing around the United States. In the 1950s police officials in other cities took up, and expanded, the stop-and-search tactics by using the LAPD to embrace the theory of crime

Read More

More about Justifiable Vehicle Search

Related Topics

Open Document