More handpicked essays just for you.
Why do we juveniles need to be dealt with differently than adults
Rehabilitation of juveniles and adults
Rehabilitation over the years juvenile
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Many Americans argue that teens should be tried as adults for the violent crimes they commit. Teenage murder rates have been increasing over time. Yes, there are people that think these teens shouldn't be tried as adults because of how young they are. However, I disagree, these criminals that get released are mainly the juveniles who committed adult crimes. I believe that teens should be tried as adults for many reasons.
An average juvenile was involved in an argument with his teacher and took a gun and shot him without any intentions. When on trial, he realized that he made an unwise decision and responded quizzically to the interrogation questions from the prosecutor. Subsequently, demonstrators outside the trial court argued that “a child is not a man” and shouldn’t be punished like one. Such a case was presented in the trial of Nathaniel Brazill. Although all lives matter and children are known for being compulsive, dangerous citizens of our society, they are juveniles and deserve to be tried as juveniles.
The most startling rate of criminal involvement among many adolescents and young juveniles (young adults) is a major cause of concerns in Canada and the world at large. On the contrary, it is not accidental that the vast majority of youth who have enact these vicious crimes are incarcerated or place in juvenile detention centres. With the onset of mental health issues are currently on the rise scientific research are intended to comprehend this episode of juvenile offenders has prompted an investigation of the many contributing risk factors associated with these types of behavioural problems. In relation to this stigma what
In view of everyone is created equal, juveniles should also be punished equally. There are lots of reasons for each side of the argument, justice Elena Kagan believes that juveniles should not be tried as adults because of their “immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate the risks and consequences.” However, Justice Alito believes that they should be tried because “mandatory sentences reflected the will of American Society that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should always be punished.” Knowing I am a juvenile that could be affected by this, I completely agree with Justice Alito because the offender knows that what they are doing is wrong, the victims and their families deserve justice, they do not have underdeveloped brains and as hard it is to believe some juveniles enjoy hurting as well as taking the life of human beings. Kids are constantly taught from a young age the difference between right and wrong whether it is at school or at home.
Today in the United States we still have debates on whether or not a juvenile should spend his or her life in prison. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who commit murder could not receive a life in prison term. This decision was made due to the fact that it violated the Eighth Amendment which bans cruel and unusual punishment. Four justices strongly disagreed and said that a juvenile should always be punished for their heinous crimes with a life sentence, I personally agree with these four justices. The juvenile should face time in prison for his or her crime to a certain extend.
After being formally taken into custody, a prosecutor makes the decision on whether the juvenile should be released to their parent/guardian or sent to a detention center pending trial. Thousands and thousands of youth are sent to detention centers each year. According to the Justice Policy Institute in Washington D.C. “[d]etention is widely misapplied…because detention facilities are meant to temporarily house youths who are likely to reoffend before their trial or who are unlikely to appear for their court date, but many of the youths…do not meet these criteria” (Siegel & Worrall, 2015).
I do not think that juveniles should be tried as adults. I believe that juveniles should have another chance after they serve their time. There are certain jurisdictions that will try juveniles as adults. The offense committed by the juvenile determines the punishment. If a juvenile committee an adult crime, then he or she can be tried as an adult.
The exact definition of a juvenile is a “young person” who has yet to reach their 18th birthday. The average life expectancy of someone living in the U.S. is about 79 years old. Proposition 21 of 2000 allows juveniles to be considered and tried as an adult, as well as receive adult punishment such as life sentences. If a juvenile receives a life sentence before they reach adulthood, that 's more than three-fourths of one’s life gone to incarceration all because of proposition 21, (“California Proposition 21”). Juveniles this age don’t even have a fully developed brain and also can’t fully understand the circumstances they’re in.
The punishments for adolescent 10 through 17 in the court system or the incarceration of juveniles, who commits serious crime, do not work. For this Juvenile who commits a serious offense should be tried as an adult. The statistics show that the crime rate among children between the ages of 10 through 17, are on the rise. The National Institute of Justice (2012) stated that “In 2010, there were 225 arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses for every 100,000 youth between 10 and 17 years of age.”
Teenagers Should Be Treated as Adults According to Temple University professor Laurence Steinberg in his article “Juveniles in the Justice System : New Evidence from Research on Adolescent Development,” as many as 200,000 youths under the age of eighteen are tried as adults each year in the United States. Is this the best way of dealing with young offenders? As reported in a recent ABC New Poll, fifty- five percent of American adults believe the answer is yes (Sussman). There are however, clearly two sides to the issue of juvenile justice.
In our society, crimes are being committed not only by adults but by juveniles as well. By law as soon as a person turns 18 they are considered to be an adult. So what if an adult and a juvenile were to commit the same crime yet were sentenced differently simply based on the fact that one is a child and one is an adult? Juveniles are committing violent crimes just as adults and should be given the equal treatment and sentencing as adults receive. Juveniles aren’t completely ignorant as everyone seems to think.
Should juvenile be charged as Adult? In the year 1994 a total of 497 juveniles were arrested. Now a days you hear about young kids doing adult crimes and not being charged as an adult because they are just kids. But really, some kids know from right to wrong.
Under the common law states that a child could not commit a crime if the defense was able to prove infancy or in other word immaturity. If the teenager is old enough to commit the crime and then they are definitely old enough to put in the same amount of time as an adult would. There would be a criteria for sentencing, based on the type of crime of offense, the age of the offender and the number of offenses he/she has committed (Quantz 197). To make the young offenders understand what's right and their wrong doings they need to have punishments. If you would try them as adults the crime rates would surely go
Juveniles that have committed grave crimes should be charged as an adult. Although it is argued that their minds have not fully developed, it should not act as a reason to lessen their punishment. Minors should be able to differentiate between right and wrong, and must hold responsibility for their ultimate decision. Grave crimes that juveniles cause will also affect the victim’s family and friends.
As business dictionary simply explains, power is an authority held by a group within a society, whereas society is a group of people sharing the same norms, values, culture and identity. However, youth society is a little bit different from adulthood and have different rules and norms when we talk about authority and by who it is being held. Power is established by Government, however as Tim Newburn stated in his article police is a first line of contact with young offenders. Everything what happens in the youth justice system hinge on set of decisions taken earlier by the police. They use different types of controlling juvenile offenders such as reprimands, final warnings and stop and search.
