ipl-logo

Kan Kant's Principle Of Morality Essay

442 Words2 Pages

The statement that “We should never use a good person as a means to an end” is false. Kant states that the Principle of Humanity is to always treat a human being as an end, and never as a mere means. Kant also believes that you should always respect rational people and should never use anyone or break moral laws no matter what.
It is true Kant’s Principle of Humanity is found under categorical imperative, but categorical imperative is a moral obligation that cannot be unkept no matter what the circumstances may be. However, the statement “Kant argues that we should never act based on hypothetical imperatives” is false. Kant believes that hypothetical imperatives can be applied rarely, in certain situations.
The principle of universalizability states that if one act is correct then another act, in an identical situation, should be correct too. Treating others how you would like to be treated is the golden rule, so according to the principle of universalizability if person A treats person B one way, it only makes sense for person B to treat person A that way. Thus, the golden rule and principle of universalizability are equivilent in that case. …show more content…

So, it is true that Kant believes if an action is not universalizable then it is immoral.
Question number five is true. Kant believes that humanity is only for those who possess autonomy and rationality. Because animals do not possess those characteristics Kant believes that they have no rights to humanity and should not be treated equally compared to humans. However, Kant believed that cruelty to animals could lead to the cruelty of humans which would not be morally

Show More
Related
536 Words | 3 Pages

The 1893 world's fair was an amazing experience. New inventions and extraordinary exhibits were scattered throughout a gleaming white city of newly constructed buildings, including the largest ever built at the time. Millions came from around America and the world to see this confluence of civilization in Chicago, but some never made it home. Before, during, and after the Fair, a serial killer named H. H. Holmes preyed on single women, killing possibly as many as 200 people total, although that estimate may be unrealistically high. The Devil in the White City by Erik Larson tells the story of the Fair and of the trajectory of Holmes’s killings.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Angela Davis’ book Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons, and Torture provides her critique on how today’s democracy is continually weakened by structures of oppression, such as slavery, reconstruction, and lynching. By utilizing her own experience and employing views from historical figures like Frederick Douglass and W.E.B. Dubois, Davis examines the chain of racism, sexism, and political oppression. She speaks of the hidden moral and ethical issues that bring difference within people’s social situations. In the “Abolition Democracy” chapter, she describes the relationship between the production of law and violation of law demonstrated in the United States.

Read More
1090 Words | 5 Pages

In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant does not presume to establish moral laws; he posits the basis for moral law itself. Through this process, Kant introduces the opposing concepts of heteronomy, laws provided externally for the individual, and autonomy, laws established via the application of reason. The implication arises that autonomy under Kant's definition is freedom, and that autonomy is a requisite for moral actions. To fully develop an understanding of this relationship it is crucial to deconstruct and integrate his notions of: will, duty, maxim, and imperative. Humans have the unique ability to perceive natural law, and imagine or will those forces to be different.

Read More
1969 Words | 8 Pages

Kant states universal laws that everyone should abide by and should never do like steal, cheat, or kill. This is a rule

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

He asserts that it is wrong to treat animals as mere means to an end, just as it is wrong to treat humans in this way.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

(5). Personally I agree with his saying, if animals are allowed to have a basic moral status, then chances are that less harm towards the animals will be

Read More
180 Words | 1 Pages

In his brief essay, “On a Supposed Right to Lie from Altruistic Motives”, Immanuel Kant emphasizes how essential it is to be truthful and how our duty to be truthful outweighs any other duties we have to ourselves to ourselves or to humanity. Altruistic can be described as a genuinely moral act. People who are altruistic take action for the benefit of others and deem other people’s interests more important than their own interests. Kant believes that people should always do what is right, no matter what the outcome holds. I affirm that Kant believes praising truthfulness above all other duties because he believes it is morally wrong to hurt the dignity of others.

Read More
397 Words | 2 Pages

In the essay “The Moral Status of Animals”, published in 2006, Martha C. Nussbaum reflects the aspect of dignity and comments on the dignified existence of both human and nonhuman beings. Throughout her essay, Nussbaum draws parallels between classical doctrines and the treatment of nonhuman beings among other things on the example of a trial in India, which examined the “undignified” treatment and living conditions of circus animals. Although scientists still puzzle over the extent of a nonhuman beings ' morality, Nussbaum argues in her essay that animals should be entitled to a dignified existence as well as humans, because every living being has specific forms of “flourishing” and deserves to unfold its opportunities in life. Under consideration of Kantian’s, Rachels’s and Bentham’s theories, which differentiate in several points, Nussbaum examines the animals’ moral capabilities. She disagrees with Kant’s statement about the

Read More
1963 Words | 8 Pages

A categorical imperative is such that it commands an action that is “objectively necessary by itself, without reference to another end” (414). From these definitions, it is clear to see that an imperative carries absolute necessity and universality. Hence, Kant formulates the SP as the categorical imperative, which is beneficial as Kant also asserts exactly what is contained by a categorical imperative, namely the law and “only the necessity of the maxim to conform to with this law” (420-421), can be revealed by inspection. Kant’s categorical imperative

Read More
1433 Words | 6 Pages

Arguing that since moral law is universal, it must follow that duties are moral requirements that are completely independent of personal interests and that acting dutiful adds moral worth to actions. Understanding that he cannot explicitly list out the moral actions of every particular circumstance, Kant draws on the concept of aiming to equate the maxim of an action to universal law. Vindicating this proposition, he provides the

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

In closing, Kant makes for a wide range on what can be termed as an absolute moral duty, with his argument of the principle of universalizability and the principle of humanity. Kant argument shows that I should do things whether I want to do so or not. “With the results [being] that if [I] ignore or disobey them, [I] [am] acting contrary to reason (i.e. irrationally),” (FE, 168). Being a rational being is something that human beings are able to achieve. With Kant argument, we can only determine if an action is right or wrong once we know its maxim.

Read More
1969 Words | 8 Pages

First, I will explain the Formula of Universal Law and focus on the ethical position of duty belonging to Kant’s deontological ethics. Next, I’ll present Kant’s lying promise case and will analyze his explanation of it being immoral through the Formula of Universal Law. Finally, I’ll end by stating my disagreement with Kant’s

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

He says that one must act not only in accordance to duty, but for the sake of duty However, According to the Utilitarianism, Mill emphasizes that the actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness Immanuel Kant is the founder of the Kantian branch of ethics and morality, and his theories are personally my favorite theory of ethics so far. According to the utilitarianism, the best action is the one that maximizes utility. However, in Kant’s moral philosophy, people

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

This is because the consequences of the utilitarian mentality can’t be applied in all situations due to the dangerous outcomes it can lead to. Kantian ethics is concerned about practical reason and motives rather than the consequences of the action. In most cases, the utilitarian will base their actions on what the best result is for the greatest number of people, while Kant argues that a goodwill “is good only through its willing” (Kant, 2008, p. 106). In fact, Kant argues that even “with the greatest effort it should yet achieve nothing, and only the good will should remain…yet would it, like a jewel, still shine by its own light as something which has its full value in itself. Its usefulness or fruitlessness can neither augment nor diminish this value” (Kant, 2008, p. 106).

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

Unit 2 Learning Assignment Research paper Abebe Erena University of the People term 4 (2015-2016) PHIL 1404: ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY April 19, 2016 Before I would have to answer the three ethical philosophers statement which I have read in the unit, describing about how each of those three, what they would explain about regarding the actions of a person who steals food to fees a starving child, or in other words, the theft of the food for child moral. Ethics in my understanding is the study of fundamental and basic principle of good human understanding, common action that benefits the society, and have of moral

Read More

More about Kan Kant's Principle Of Morality Essay

Related Topics

Open Document