Kantian Theory Of Morality

526 Words3 Pages

Also, volunteering to sell our organs does not mean losing altruistic values of giving an organ and commodifying does not mean the only thing of value is money. In Kantian theory, you must perform the right action for the right reasons. The good will is the good in itself. Reasons, means what makes a good will good, is its compliance to act in accordance with the obligations dictated by reason. Duty means a good will acts to the moral laws established by reason, thus an act is morally just only when it is done for the sake of duty (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 16). When you act on the basis of inclination due to reward or pleasure then that act is not out of our good will. Thus, we are not acting for the sake of duty when selling our organs for financial incentives, because we are then acting on inclination, and not acting from our good will, and our reasons are not morally sound. People who are poor may make decisions that are contrary to their interests because of coercion, or undue influence, which means …show more content…

1057). Kant argues, the duty to one self to consent into an object for the use of others is wrong, and doing it for money is worse (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 365). While this choice of autonomy is one to respect, we should deem the act of selling an organ as an act of desperation for the unfortunate (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 368). The individual is then not acting willingly or is coerced owing to unfair conditions (Hippen et al., 2010, p.1057). From a feminist perspective,