ipl-logo

Kant's Categorical Imperative

1142 Words5 Pages

A Categorical Imperative is the origin of Immanuel Kant’s moral theory. According to Kant the Categorical Imperatives are commands you must follow, regardless of your desires. They are moral obligations, and Kant believed that they are derived from pure reason. It tells us what we ought to do and gives us a clear understanding in Kant’s opinion of what our duties are and are not. There are certain things that are duties that we ought to be doing for the sake of duty because they are the right thing and certain thing we ought not be doing. If we have a duty to tell the truth we also have a duty not to lie, because lying is immoral specifically because telling the truth is morally essential. The categorical imperative helps us figure out what …show more content…

The first formulation known as the universalizability principle. Kant phrased it this way, “act only according to that maxim which you can at the same time will that is should become a universal law without contradiction.” This means before I act, I would ask myself, what is the general rule that stands behind the particular action I am considering? Kant says we have to use our capacities as human beings to think about whether something is the right thing to do or not. If we imagine what it would be like to universalize something it becomes clear why it is or is not a good idea. Let’s say I forgot my purse at home this morning. I do not have time to pick it up between class and work, and I am very hungry. I over hear the security guard talking about how the cameras are down, so I could easily snag a sandwich from the cafeteria without anyone noticing. Would this be ok morally? The particular action I am hypothetically considering is taking a sandwich without paying for it, or stealing. If I approve the maxim of stealing, whether I admit it or not I am actually universalizing that action. I am saying that everyone should steal. If I should be able to do it everyone should. But this leads to a contradiction, because Kant’s wording specifically says that moral actions cannot

Show More
Related

Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary

1090 Words | 5 Pages

The implication of this being that in order for an action to be moral why it is done must be able to be why it is done by anyone, anywhere, at any time. A clear example of this imperative comes when one considers lying. If one lies and presumes that lie to be moral, that lie must then be able to be made the universal law. If lying were the universal law one could not lie as lying relies on truth-telling as universal law to serve its function. In his second formulation, Kant states "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means."

Read More

Comparing Kant's Categorical Imperative And Duties

1985 Words | 8 Pages

According to Categorical Imperative, what would it be like if everyone started making false promises and it became a universal law? It would be a undesirable situation where the very notion of ‘promise’ would collapse. Therefore, it is a duty of every rational being not to make a lying promise. Such duties are called strict duties to others. Strict Duties to self : A man is in a very miserable condition.

Read More

United States Military Academy's Honor Code

1983 Words | 8 Pages

More colloquially, Kant is saying that you must be able to imagine and live in a world where this maxim is universalized. Kant’s second categorical imperative, the formula of end in itself, states that you should never treat others (including yourself) as a mere means, but always as ends in themselves. It is important to differentiate mere means and means. Mere means is when an individual uses someone as a tool for their own goals without

Read More

Comparing Kant And Mill's Murderer At The Door

1215 Words | 5 Pages

However, what if we are faced with a murderer standing at our front door asking for a victim that could be hiding in our house. Kant expresses that acts are never right even when it accompanies an ideal result; therefore, he infers that lying to the perpetrator is not just even though it could save the victim’s life. On the off chance that Kant is right that ethical absolutes can't be damaged, then he keeps any escape clauses, self-serving special cases, and individual inclinations in the determination of our

Read More

Categorical Imperative In Kantian Ethics

1636 Words | 7 Pages

When a maxim passes the test, it gains the status of an objective rule of morality that holds for everyone. A possible Maxim which could

Read More

Immanuel Kant's Othe Lying

1288 Words | 6 Pages

Where are there are no rights, there are no duties. To tell the truth is a duty: but it remains a duty only in respect to one who has a right to the truth. However, no one has a right to a truth which injures others ( Kant, Immanuel). The question of whether or not lying ever proves acceptable constitutes as a gray area. An idea proposed by Immanuel Kant, are you to lie to a murderer?

Read More

Deontology In Kant's Categorical Imperatives

1036 Words | 5 Pages

Firstly what is a Categorical Imperative? Well according to Robert Johnson who wrote in ‘The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy’ “it is an imperative because it is a command… It is categorical in virtue of applying to us unconditionally…” so in other words it is moral actions that Kant wants us to apply universally without thought. Second is that of Maxims; Garrath Williams who also wrote in The Stanford Encyclopaedia said “the principle that unity is to be sought after none the less forms (what Kant calls) a ‘maxim’ or regulative principle or reason.”

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Kant's Categorical Imperative

1222 Words | 5 Pages

I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

Read More

Kant's Categorical Imperative

256 Words | 2 Pages

The categorical imperative is a central concept of the Kantian ethic according to Kant, all the morality of the human being must be able to be reduced to a single fundamental commandment, born of reason, not of divine authority, from which all the others can be deduced Human obligations. He defined the concept of categorical imperative as any proposition that declares action (or inaction) as necessary. In his opinion, the previous moral maxims were based on hypothetical imperatives, so they were not obliged to comply in any situation and from any moral, religious or ideological approach. According to Kant, the only thing that is good, always and in every situation, is goodwill. And to say that a person acts by goodwill is tantamount to saying

Read More

What Are Some Ethical Issues In Gone Baby Gone

1861 Words | 8 Pages

They base the rightness or wrongness of a specific action depending on the action’s adherence to a rule. Where the “right” thing to do is to make a decision that can be universalized to the masses. The overarching point that Kantians believe is to never make an exception for yourself. Furthermore, they can determine the rightness of an action based on five steps. First, state what act you are considering doing and why you want to do it.

Read More

Bribery In Kant's Categorical Imperative

742 Words | 3 Pages

He believed that in the theory of deontology which says that consequences doesn’t matter, what really matter is the motivation, but how can we know which is a moral motivation? That is a very good question, this’s why Kant came up with Categorical Imperative, which are the steps to we can used to make a decision. There are three main principle in CI. First we have the principal of university, which says that if an action is right for others, then it’s right for us. Let’s talk about bribery, is it moral right?

Read More

Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

1969 Words | 8 Pages

Kant provides a definition of the categorical imperative, “ A categorical imperative would be one that represented an action as itself objectively necessary, without regard to any further end” (Kant 337). In other words, a categorical imperative is a moral law that absolute in any test or situation, and does not depend on the end result or an ulterior motive. The Formula of Universal Law depends on the reasoning, “ Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (Kant 330). This means that whatever your action is, it would be recast to apply to everyone. In this case the maxim is the rationality for doing an action, which has a end goal.

Read More

Blue Christmas Eve: A Short Story

1433 Words | 6 Pages

INT. AUDITORIUM - DAY - 1973NANCY, 23 and pale with thick purple glasses, flattens the wrinkles in her blouse as she lingers just off-stage in an auditorium. The pulled curtains conceal her as she fidgets. The space around her is wood-panelled, quaint, and nearly empty, with rafters high above her head.   Nancy swallows and pushes up her glasses.

Read More

A Critical Analysis Of Immanuel Kant's Deontology

1000 Words | 4 Pages

The categorical imperative is formal, while the substance is decided by the person. The idea is that by a process of reasoning, one can check his intuitions and desires and see if they can become a general rule for moral behavior. Kant bases his theory on three main concepts: the good will, the duty and the law. The moral worth of an action is measured in its intention.

Read More

Basic Principle Deontological Analysis

929 Words | 4 Pages

Kant believes that most people know right from wrong; the problem most people have is not in knowing what is morally, but in doing it. Kant also argued that rightness or wrongness of particular acts is determined by rules; these rules could be determined by his principle of universalizability. He also argued reason require not only that moral duties be universal but also absolutely binding. For instance, when lying is the only option to save someone’s life, still we shall not lie for it is morally wrong to lie. Kant introduced categorical imperative which states that people ought to do something regardless of the consequences.

Read More

More about Kant's Categorical Imperative

Related Topics

Open Document