ipl-logo

Karl Marx Alienation Essay

763 Words4 Pages

Karl Marx was a German historian, philosopher and economist. He said that whole society falls apart into two class property owners and propertyless workers. He introduced the four types of alienation (product, process, species-being and other people). The three types of alienation that I choose are product, process and species- being. I will talk about these topics from my dad’s experience in the workforce. By profession, he is a truck driver. My dad is kind of agree with Marx’s idea of alienation in the workforce.
The first type of alienation product that I will be talking about is the alienation of the product. Product means that a worker is producing something and from their labour works the owners are getting richer. For example, my dad has to deliver the product at the right time right …show more content…

For example, my dad has to wake up early because his company told him that he has to deliver the load at the right moment that the owner told them. He has to agree with his company conditions. At that moment, my dad has a different personality compared to the personality that he has at home with us. “The worker therefore only feel himself outside his work, and in his work feels outside himself. He feels at home when he is not working, and when he is working he does not feel at home. His labour is therefore not voluntary, but coerced; it is forced labour”. I think that Marx wants to prove that the workplace should be home for you, because it gives you happiness, but if you are not happy with your work, then it will look like that you are in a kind of jail that you don’t want to enter in your whole life and that is what Marx said that worker feels in the workplace that they do not belong to this place. In the text, it says that you become a machine that 's being manipulated by a boss, then it means that you are being a cog in the machine, because, for your boss, you are just an object that has to work for

Show More
Related
893 Words | 4 Pages

Essentially, the worker does not control what he or she produces because the capitalists control it to ensure an increase of profit. In Alienated Labour, Marx explains that, “this relationship is at the same time the relationship to the sensuous exterior world and to natural objects as to an alien and hostile world opposed to him”(McIntosh 1997:18). He argues that the workers feels alienated form their own work because they know that they will be unable to reap the benefits (McIntosh 1997). An example of product alienation is how Z understand that he is digging tunnels to increase the production of the colony however is alienated because he does not receive any personal benefits of his work. The general stands in front of the entire colony and says, “We are the hero’s.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

From 1790 to the late 1800’s, the Industrial Revolution recreated industry as Europe knew it with ground-breaking inventions and mass-producing factories. The Industrial Revolution widened the social gap with the bourgeoisie on a pedestal and the proletariat baring the weight of being the work class that would make the Industrial Revolution happen; this strife would lead to many riots and revolutions across Europe as many men like Karl Marx would develop solutions to the proletarian’s problems such as communism. The question arose of how the proletariat were to rebel against the bourgeoisie. The fact was that a revolution was inevitable.

Read More
1789 Words | 8 Pages

In his capitalist system “the worker receives means of subsistence in exchange for [their] labor power,” which serves no purpose but “immediate consumption,” whereas the capitalist receives “a greater value” than they had previously (Marx 209). The worker, despite creating additional earnings for the capitalist, only receives their “means of sustenance,” or their bare minimum for survival. Because the worker has been alienated from their work and the system however, they normalize this exchange, and are content with receiving a mere fraction of what they produce, unaware of their exploitation. Alienation provides the framework for both Douglass’ and Marx’s economic systems to function, as it allows the ruling class to establish a norm of

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

The premises presented by Karl Marx on his manuscript were genuinely with accord to the ordeal of the workers as they lose themselves in the hands of the capitalists. But, as we stated in the first part of this paper, we think there is a flaw in his second premise, the estrangement of the worker from the activity production. We believe that labor done by workers - explicitly those who take pleasure in doing their job- doesn’t necessarily imply that everything that they do is not out of their essential being primarily because they love what they do, and any work that is done out of passion and love comes from the essential being of a

Read More
200 Words | 1 Pages

Marx, equally, believes that the outcome of industrial capitalism is alienation of the proletariat, the working class, from their society.

Read More
1261 Words | 6 Pages

This alienation arises in part because of the antagonisms, which inevitable arise from the class structure of society. We are alienated from those who exploit our labor and control the things we produce.” (Marx). Karl Marx explains in his Theory of Alienation that isolation of an individual is the result of living in a society stratified by social classes. According to Marx, there are four types of alienation; alienation of the worker from their product, alienation of the worker from the act of production, alienation of the worker from their Gattungswesen (species-essence), and alienation from other workers.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

This is because despite the energy of labor and the being of the labor which are put into the product, that product itself doesn’t belong to the laborer nor do they receive any benefits from the product i.e., ‘the fruits of their labor’. In a sense, the laborer loses something of himself during the time spent creating this estranged object, as it doesn 't identify with it as a meaningful part of its own presence as a person, yet simply as an independent entity alienated to itself. Marx states that the “worker puts his life into the object; but now his life no longer belongs to him but to the object” (29). Therefore, the more labor one puts into a product the more powerful and estranged the world of products becomes of them. This estrangement can become so acute that the bare necessities of living are taken from the laborer as the more products they produce, the less they possess.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Because Marx believes the worker would “put his [or her] life into the [alien] object” (William, 132) he/she is producing, they are ultimately alienated, unconnected to

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

According to Indergraard (2007), industrialization is “the process by which an economy shifts from an agricultural to a manufacturing base during a period of sustained change and growth, eventually creating a higher standard of living”. Within sociology, the three founding fathers, particularly Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim, were interested in studying what the causes of industrialization and the consequences of it on the development of society. This essay will compare the ways in which Marx and Durkheim shared similar ideas about industrialisation within society as well as contrast the aspects of their theories which have different ideological roots and conclusions. The essay with then go on to conclude that whilst there were some key differences

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

Marx said the value of Labor power depends on the number of hours it takes society to feed, clothe and shelter a worker so he, or she is able to work. He asked the question: if all services and goods in a capitalist society are sold at wages and prices that show their true value, how can capitalists enjoy earnings? How do capitalists squeeze out left overs between total earnings and total costs? He said capitalists must have a powerful place because they are owners of the means of production and then

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Essentially what Watson is expressing is that Capitalists exploit workers by paying them less than they are worth in order to extract enough profit from them to enable them to be able to survive within the capitalist system. This system works in favour for the Capitalist but in essence in opposition to the labourer who is getting less money for what their labour is worth. Under a capitalist economy where the worker is exploited makes the employment relationship very conflictual in the marxarian view highlights Edwards,et al. (2006). This exploitation in work that happens under a capitalist economy is the reason why Marx arrived at the conclusion that working in this system would be very conflictual and oppressive.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Writings of Karl Marx had formed the theoretical basis for communism and the continual debate against capitalism. Marx understood capitalism to be a system in which the means of production are privately owned and profit is generated by the sale of the proletariat’s labour. He considered it to be an unfair exploitation of hard work with alienated social interactions and purpose. I agree with Marx that capitalism is indeed unfair and alienating, because it concentrates wealth within a small group of people by exploiting the surplus value of workers’ labour, and creates an alienated workforce. Hence, this essay will first discuss the relevance of Marx’s perception of capitalism as an alienating and unfair system for the contemporary world, before examining the potential of governments to influence the extent of alienation and unfairness that occurs.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Karl Marx and Max Weber both agreed that capitalism generates alienation in modern societies, but the cause for it were both different. For Marx it is due to economic inequality in where the capitalist thinks that the workers worth nothing more than a source of labour, that can be employed and dismissed at will. This causes the workers to be dehumanised by their jobs (in the past, routine factory work and in the present-day, managing demands on a computer), which leads to the workers finding slight satisfaction and feeling incapable of improving their situation. It was noted by Marx four methods on how capitalism alienates workers. The first, is alienation from the function of working.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Melvin Seeman’s five prominent features of alienation Melvin Seeman, the American sociologist, considers alienation as the summation of the individual's emotions, divides it into five different modalities: powerlessness, meaninglessness, normlessness, and finally self-estrangement. 1. Powerlessness According to Seeman, powerlessness theoretically means when the individual believes his activity will fail to yield the results he seeks. He also opines that the notion of alienation is rooted in the Marxian view of the worker’s condition in capitalist society, where the worker is alienated to the extent that the prerogative and means of decision are expropriated by the ruling entrepreneurs.

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

In the Communist manifesto, a well known quote of Marx, “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” This is introductory to the first part of the pamphlet and a conclusion to Marx’s theory about class struggle. Marx’s highly structured on how the class struggle emerges and affects the development of a society. The development of a society from the old and from the new is the result of the conflict of classes in the society.

Read More

More about Karl Marx Alienation Essay

Related Topics

Open Document