ipl-logo

Karl Raimund Popper's Approach To Philosophy

1234 Words5 Pages

NAME: VADICHERLA SATHWIKA ID NUMBER: 2013A3PS171H KARL POPPER
Karl Raimund Popper was born on 28 July 1902 in Vienna. He was a professor and philosopher of Austrian-British descent, and is regarded as one of the greatest philosopher of science in the 20th century. Popper holds a PhD in Philosophy. His approach to philosophy is platonic. Philosophy for popper is an exploratory, self-critical, hesitant and skeptical kind of inquiry. Popper being a rationalist believed that the main essence in the philosophy of science is setting apart science from non-science. In 1935, Popper published his first major work in the philosophy of science “Logik der Forschung (The Logic of Research) and translated this book to English and published it under …show more content…

Popper studied published works of Freud and also attended lectures of Einstein. During this period he noticed that Freud predicted that our childhood experiences would have a heavy bearing on who we grew up to be where as Einstein waited for a solar eclipse that could disprove his entire theory of relativity. Freud used to confirm his theory by looking at the events that have occurred in the past, Einstein wasn’t looking at past data to support the events but was rather looking ahead and predicted future states. Popper finally tried to differentiate science from pseudo-science saying methods that serve to confirm beliefs are pseudo-science and they can be used to prove anything. If the existence of tooth fairy is considered, we have a filthy load of evidence in the world but Popper would argue that it’s only by seeking to disprove tooth fairy’s existence that one can demonstrate his unreality. In other words science disconfirms and pseudo-science confirms.
Popper declines induction as an applicable scientific method and is in favor of deductive reasoning. Inductive process is where single statements are used to imply universal statements. Popper mentions four steps on how the deductive process …show more content…

This practice of eradicating tentative theories works similar to the way biological evolution takes place. Even if an attempt gets successful it can only be considered as a failed attempt to disprove the theory. Supporting evidence should matter only when the result is obtained from a genuine test of theory, it can be called as a failed attempt to falsify the theory. Popper believes that scientific knowledge is all about probability and contingency, we believe in a theory that is most probable with the data in hand but one should always be willing to revise the beliefs in the light of new evidence. Belief should be contingent upon the

Show More
Related

Medical Wisdom Challenged By A Cocktail Summary

401 Words | 2 Pages

In Jay Hardy article, “Medical Wisdom Challenged by a Cocktail” analyzes the discovery of the real cause of gastric ulcers. Also, he talked about Marshall’s struggle trying to prove his theory in an outrageous way. Most scientists thought the cause of stomach ulcers before Warren and Marshall’s discovery were stress, excess acid, and eating spicy food. However, German scientists researched that a spiral-shaped bacterium inhabited that was lining of the human stomach, but they couldn’t culture the organism. So, the research on stomach ulcers were forgotten.

Read More

Summary Of The Great Influenza By John Barry

512 Words | 3 Pages

Scientific Research and the Unknown Scientific research can be defined using a number of different methods. John M. Barry writes about the scientific process in The Great Influenza, and he uses several different tactics in characterizing it. Barry uses metaphors and unusual syntax in order to characterize scientific research as uncertain and unknown. Barry compares scientific research to venturing into the wilderness in order to characterize it as a journey into the unknown. He begins this comparison by explaining that the best scientists “move deep into a wilderness region where they know almost nothing, where the very tools and techniques needed to clear the wilderness, to bring order to it, do not exist” (Barry 26-29).

Read More

John Barry The Great Influenza Rhetorical Analysis

826 Words | 4 Pages

The scientific method is paramount to scientists and their studies. Barry affirms, “Ultimately a scientist

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis: The Great Influenza

425 Words | 2 Pages

John M. Barry addresses his feelings about scientists and their research through the piece from, “The Great Influenza,” an account of the 1918 flu epidemic. He adopts a speculative tone and utilizes rhetorical strategies such as fallacies, metaphors, and word choice to characterize scientists research. Barry describes the positive mind set and the requirements to be a scientists. The requirements of being a scientist would not only be, “intelligence and curiosity,”but to also to be open minded and to have courage.

Read More

Btec Health And Social Care Level 3 Unit 10 M1

538 Words | 3 Pages

M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?

Read More

Great Influenza Persuasive Speech

492 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Anyone can end up in Todd Willingham’s place; anyone, even you or someone you might know, can have their life seized away from them under the title of justice due to the ignorance of the system in understanding how evidence should be interpreted and due to the gullibility that makes people believe almost anything they hear. So, despite the capital punishment being only issued if the suspect was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt, a question remains unanswered: In a system where science and pseudoscience are indistinguishable, how can one define reasonable doubt? Yes, there should be punishments to deter crimes; but, we should also acknowledge the fact that science says there is nothing called reaching the truth- there is only approaching it. So for the sake of that asymptote, we should bear in mind J.R.R Tolkien’s saying (1954)

Read More

'Battling Bad Science' By Ben Goldacre

182 Words | 1 Pages

In the Ted talk on "Battling Bad Science", the speaker Ben Goldacre tackles the lack of critical analysis by the public of scientific claims by debunking popular medical claims and exposing methods of borderline falsifying evidence behind claims. Science is a unique subject varying from all others in many rights, particularly when it comes to the critical analysis of its claims by the general public. Unlike politics, law, history, etc., science is given huge leeway to make uncontested claims by the public, where as in other fields their claims are scrutinized before being accepted. On the contrary, people willingly expect dodgy “scientific” claims which often contradict themselves.

Read More

Christopher Delgado's Essay 'The Culture Of Denial'

627 Words | 3 Pages

RRR: The Culture of Denial In the essay “The Culture of Denial” (2015) by Christopher Delgado, he expounds on the opinion that there is an issue within the public with the trusting of the scientific community’s discoveries. Delgado does this by providing numerous examples of the kind of discoveries that a good amount of the public does not fully believe along with some examples of why those people do not trust said scientific concept. Delgado explains this in order to expose the masses to how much we mistrust the scientific community, and how we must alter that mistrust into trust. The intended audience for this reading is the general public, or specifically the ones who are in denial of scientific information.

Read More

Thesis Statement In Robert Frost's The Road Not Taken

778 Words | 4 Pages

Explaining in his writing to help examine the complex philosophical topics like nature

Read More

Inductivism Vs Falsification Theory

1172 Words | 5 Pages

In inductivism, a finite number of specific facts leads to a general conclusion. In falsificationism, definite claims about the world make a law or a theory falsifiable. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better, but not yet being falsified. For falsificationism scientific progress is possible via trial and error. While inductivism is applied to mathematics for instance where generalization is more possible, falsificationism is really common in biology, physics or social sciences, where there is not a general pattern, but many exceptions to the laws or theories.

Read More

Differences Between Science And Pseudoscience

1410 Words | 6 Pages

He thought there was something special on the science side of the line. Under the assumption that science has suitable methodology for avoiding false beliefs, one of the problems with pseudo-science is that it gets an unfair development by mimicking the surface appearance of science. The big difference Popper identifies between science and pseudo-science is a difference in attitude. Popper believes while a science is set up to challenge its claims and look for evidence that might prove it false, a pseudo-science is set up to look for evidence that supports its claims.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Evolution Vs Evolution

1412 Words | 6 Pages

Science says that in order for something to be a fact it needs to have many accounts of observable and repeating evidence that supports

Read More

Popper's Theory Of Scientific Progress Essay

1245 Words | 5 Pages

Karl Popper was a twentieth-century philosopher that had a dissatisfaction with the definition of what could be considered a “science.” The claim of falsification, being able to equally be observed false, made Popper’s argument of demarcation appealing to those with the same inquiries about the method of scientific progress. Popper said to be defined as a real science, one needs to make risky, bold predictions that could easily be refuted by observation. I will argue that the construction of Popper’s scientific progress is flawed due to the refutations of infinite hypotheses and observational unreliability.

Read More

Essay On Value Of Knowledge

1578 Words | 7 Pages

Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates.

Read More

More about Karl Raimund Popper's Approach To Philosophy

Related Topics

Open Document