Surrogacy has been said to exploit women, however I disagree and feel it liberates those unable to carry a child. Katz argues that surrogacy “reduces the women to a container” and leads to reproductive works being controlled by others. While Purdy argues that by willingly agreeing to be a surrogate it creates a positive situation which enables infertile, non-traditional families to have children, and the surrogates to be compensated for their service. I agree with Purdy, believing Katz wrongly represents the liberating miracle surrogacy can bring to those unable to carry children. It has been argued surrogacy targets and exploits the poor, however by doing so it deems any job or service the less fortunate take to be exploitation. And so