ipl-logo

Kennedy Hosp Vs Bludsworth Summary

420 Words2 Pages

Name of Case:
The case name is John F. Kennedy Hosp. v. Bludworth. When and where did it take place?
This happened on May 24, 1984. This took place in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, West Palm Beach, FL. Issue:
This issue was regarding a comatose and fatally ill patient who has completed a written document entitled mercy will and Last Testament, is it required that a court appointed guardian of his person get the approval of a court of capable jurisdiction before ending extraordinary life support systems in order for accepting family members, the hospital staff involved in his care that to be relieved of civil and criminal liability. Facts of the case:
Mr. Landy underwent permanent brain damage and not able to breathe in his own. In the next days …show more content…

If necessary to go further, the present inclination is to require the nomination of a guardian to act for an inept adult. An inept can act only through a guardian; no one but a guardian can auxiliary his decision for a ward.
Court Decision :
The court decision was to afford the right to the inept persons is to use the substituted judgment. This is a doctrine that close family members or legal guardians substitute their decision for what they consider the terminally ill inept persons, if capable, would have done under these conditions. If such a person, while capable, had implemented the document written living or mercy will, that will would be credible evidence of that inept person 's purpose and it would be given countless weight by the person who substitute their decision on behalf of the lethally ill

Show More
Related
726 Words | 3 Pages

The district court found that the Washington law violated both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the court of appeals affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. 4. Issue Three terminal ill patients and four doctors brought forth a case challenging Washington State’s position on assisted suicide.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

So, if we consider only the economic facts of the case, the PEG tube should be removed in the first place. Yet, the parents suggest the reason behind Michael request to have the tube removed is to have rest of the money for Terri’s care. In conclusion, if I were to be Terri, I wouldn’t want to continue my life while if I were to be Terri’s parents or husband, I would want her to live as long as she can regarding both my connection with her and that it is not my decision to kill someone. However, as a person outside of the case, I support the removing of the PEG tube with a concern of

Read More
137 Words | 1 Pages

The appellant, Sue Rodriguez, suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Under this condition, Sue will lose the ability to swallow, speak, walk, and move her body without assistance. As a result, she will eventually become confined to a bed. With a life expectancy between 2 and 14 months, Sue wishes to end her life on her own will when her condition becomes too painful to bear. This can be accomplished with the assistance of a qualified physician.

Read More
2245 Words | 9 Pages

At the time, the state of Missouri did not allow anyone to unplug if the patient cannot speak for themselves. Unless, “clear and convincing evidence” that this is what the patient wanted. Nancy had no living will nor did she have anything in writing that this is what she would want. But, she did have a clear conversation with her sister Kris and also, 3 of her co-workers. She stated to them if anything ever severe were to happen to her, she would never want to live in a vegetative state.

Read More
181 Words | 1 Pages

Dr. Timothy Quill and three other terminally ill patients filed a case against the Attorney General of New York State claiming violation of the Equal Protection Clauses. The New York State law allowed discontinuation of life-saving treatment for a competent person who was terminally ill, however, it imposed a ban on physician assisted suicide. The district court did not agree but the Court of Appeals reversed stating that they were moreover similar things and the ban was an unequal treatment. The Supreme Court granted a certiorari. Issue: There is a clear distinction between refusing a life-saving treatment and physician assisted suicide, does the terminally ill patients vies this distinction as an operating violation of Equal Protection Clause?

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

Wanglie Would have desired, there was no reason to doubt her family on that point, but whether the continuation of ventilator support and gastrostomy feeding were among the reasonable medical alternatives that should have been available to Mrs. Wanglie or her surrogate decision maker, whoever that might be. The question, really, was whether the provision of this kind of treatment in this kind of case was outside the limits of medicine and, thus, beyond her power of choice. Mrs. Wanglie’s healthcare providers should have argued that medical practice simply did not include providing ventilator and gastrostomy feeding under circumstances of this case, and that not surrogate decision maker should be able to choose this option”

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

The case of Carter vs. Canada is one of triumph for Canadians to question their civil liberties and constitutional privileges to an extent that had not been experienced in the courts history. The decision to abandon the previous law restricting the practice of doctor assisted suicide was justified by the court in the context of those with severe illness as well as a mental disability, in which prohibits their overall wellness. In regards to Life, liberty and security, it comes to a progressive conclusion that both the Supreme Court of Canada and Tina Carter both unilaterally agree that Canadians who are suffering unbearably at the end of life should have the right to choose a dignified and peaceful death. To explicitly regard the constitutional legitimacy of physician-assisted suicide within the charter of rights general limitations, the law currently contradicts the charter.

Read More
1800 Words | 8 Pages

In order for a patient to receive the prescription for medication, a physician must declare the patient to be terminally ill, which means they have an incurable and irreversible illness, and they must have no more than six months to live. Also, a second doctor must agree with the first doctor. In addition, the terminally ill patient has to be mentally competent and able to administer the medication themself (“Threat” A12). These rules act as safeguards to ensure that the patient requesting aid in dying is making an informed decision and is acting voluntarily (Gopal

Read More
1736 Words | 7 Pages

The dying patient no longer has quality of life, they have lost their independence, are lonely, are forced to endure inevitable pain, are publicly humiliated, are suffering immensely, and are forced to watch their loved ones grieve because of them. It is an innate Constitutional Right to choose how to die, since we all will die. There comes a point when the poking and prodding becomes too much, when the patient wants to just die in silence in the loving arms of their

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

But in Donald’s case it was the total opposite. He went to the hospital with his mind already made up to die, which goes against what the doctors have being taught to do, and the principle of beneficence. The doctors decided to reject his autonomy because they knew he had an immense possibility of having a happy live and not just simply acting in a paternalistic way. In the end the doctors decisions was the right choice, when Donald stated, “I am enjoying life now, and I’m glad to be alive” (Munson6).

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

For the terminally ill the decision of ending their lives with compassion should be a fundamental right, a personal

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

Fifty eight percent of the citizens asked, said that they do not support aid-in-dying and that it can break the patient-doctor trust, twenty percent support aid-in-dying and said that no relationships were affected negatively, and twenty two percent of those asked claimed to be neutral about the topic. (Hall) The U.S Supreme Court would have to

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

The Death with Dignity Act has two arguments: those who believe we have the right to choose how and when we die, and those who believe we do not possess that right; that we should not interfere with the natural order of life. Every year, people across America are diagnosed with a terminal illness. For some people there is time: time to hope for a cure, time to fight the disease, time to pray for a miracle. For others however, there is very little or no time. For these patients, their death is rapidly approaching and for the vast majority of them, it will be a slow and agonizing experience.

Read More
3727 Words | 15 Pages

Therefore it implies that the person is not in a position to decide for himself e.g., if he is in coma or PVS. The real problem arises here because it is in these circumstances only that the possibilities of misuse of euthanasia are the greatest as any person being a relative or a next friend of such person may misuse it for his own selfish ends and therefore to avoid such misuses it is necessary to see as to who can take the decision on behalf of such person for his best interests. The hon’ble Supreme Court in Aruna Shanbaug’s case has observed that it is the High Court( acting as State) in exercise of its Parens Patriae jurisdiction which shall decide the best interests of such incompetent person and thereupon decide whether he should be allowed to go for passive euthanasia or not. It is really appreciable observation of the Hon’ble Court which minimizes the possibilities of misuse of Euthanasia. However the researcher wants to go further into the issue to examine whether a tribunal specifically dealing with such cases would be a much better option or the High Court would be the only proper authority to decide the best interests of such incompetent

Read More

More about Kennedy Hosp Vs Bludsworth Summary

Related Topics

Open Document