Kill Bill Volume 1 Film Analysis

860 Words4 Pages

Tarantino’s film narration: Non-linear storytelling Kill Bill is a revenge gangster film directed by Quentin Tarantino, the protagonist centred on a female called the bride. It is a saga of the bride’s vengeance narrative. In Kill Bill Volume 1, Quentin Tarantino’s non-classical approach made a remarkable influence, with formalist film theory, they both show strong affinities. (Peary 2013) Bill as an unseen character in the film, the sign of his presence in the whole film, it is considerable strong on the plot. Audience never feel Bill is a non-existent silence due to the way the director narrates the story. • The linear inside the non-linear: Tarantino’s formalist storytelling In the screenplay, Tarantino writes lengthened conversations …show more content…

Despite Tarantino is not the first precursor on the non-linear storytelling in film, (Dawson, 2014) it is becoming a director’s label. He used this innovative filmic technique in Kill Bill Volume 1. In the film, he built a parallel between the spectator and the character. This physical structure is indispensable in the shape of the film, ‘The tangled plot’, the formative aroused by filmmaker’s determination creatively. (Berg, 2006) The out of chronological order of events is just creating a suspension on time, it resumes and ordered well at the end of the …show more content…

It builds an intense mood of the film, also as an acoustical indication to the elapse of time. Hans Zimmer builds visible musical atmospheres throughout the film, in Inception, music interacts with the plot, the film focus more on the external shape than the intrinsic nature. (Blewitt, 1997) In Kill Bill Volume 1, Quentin Tarantino’s formalist approach on films did not devastate within classical cinema, instead, his films emerged and became popular. The film techniques he used in Kill Bill are not intricate enough in an aesthetic perspective, but the ‘Tarantino effect’ has shaped the landscape of contemporary