Patrick Henry was born in Hanover County, Virginia on May 29, 1736 (Biography.com). His father was a Scotland immigrant, and his mother from the line a Virginia gentry ( Biography.com). His father served in the colony as a Justice of The Peace (“Henry, Patrick”). At age 15, he ran a store for his father to fail to succeed (“Henry,Patrick”). As a child, he loved long walks in the forest by himself and he was a child in love with music, he learned to play the fiddle and the flute.
Hotspur more than anything else, has a code of honor that is mostly tied up with his family and what he believes is just. In one of the first scenes that we see him in, King Henry IV confronts him, and more or less orders him to cut off contact with a family member, who has married the daughter of Glendower, one of his enemies. Henry IV feels that loyalty to the King, and the state should come above loyalty to family, a thought which Hotspur ultimately disagrees with.
In conclusion, King Henry V uses his capabilities to make all of his men feel valued and equal to motivate his men to succeed throughout the battle. Therefore, he makes them feel noteworthy by giving out a very dominant speech to give his men the boldness to even participate in this fight. And also by making sure that everyone is aware that if they aren’t being heroic, then they should depart from the group before the battle
This leaves emotional appeal. He mentions honor and brotherhood and glory in an effort to unite the troops. In this time period it is the ultimate honor to fight in a glorious battle, and Henry capitalizes upon
Throughout the entire speech employs ethos because Henry is the king and an expert at warfare. His speech shows his skills at waging battle and encouraging his troops. He is getting his troops for battle with everything he has in him. “[A]nd teach them how to war”(Shakepeare). Henry V is using the skills he knows and using them for the better of his people.
‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.
Henry V grew up amidst tavern people before he became King, because of the way he was raised he was able to convey well with all of his men unconcerned of their rank or status. Henry was in a position where he had around 10,000 soldiers that were worn down and in a mindset of defeat already, compared to the 50,000 fresh French soldiers. His speech was the turning point in the war and this was before the battle started thanks to the way he was able to make all of his men feel equal and accounted for causing a victory in the battle. But we will be remembered’d; We few, we happy few, we band of brother; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.
Henry VII used Justices of the Peace on a large, nationwide scale. They were appointed for every shire and served for a year at a time. Their chief task was to see that the laws of the country were obeyed in their area. Their powers and numbers steadily increased during the time of the Tudors, never more so than under Henry's reign.[51] Despite this, Henry was keen to constrain their power and influence, applying the same principles to the Justices of the Peace as he did to the nobility: a similar system of bonds and recognisances to that which applied to both the gentry and the nobles who tried to exert their elevated influence over these local officials.
We are a band of brothers, If you have “no stomach “ you must not go into battle with me (Shakespeare). Henry is giving a speech to his soldiers and he is using emotions to touch their heart. “We will not die in that man's company that fears his fellowship to die with us (Shakespeare).” This text shows that Henry knows how to lead his troops to war and he knows how to get them to have bravery and do what they have learned while being in battle. Furthermore, Henry knows that while he is king he has to lead his country to a victory over the French men of 20,000
King Henry promises this by telling the soldiers that “from this day to the ending of the world, / But we in it shall be remembered” (ll. 58-59). Henry is letting his troops know that their victory (if they should win) will be so legendary that their story will be eternal. Additionally, Henry not only immortalizes the men, but he also promises them nobility, as “this day shall gentle his condition”, promising to lift the status of these men no matter what class they were born into (l. 63).To make this day even more memorable, Henry connects the battle to St. Crispin’s Day, giving the battle a significant title, making it more likely to be memorialized. Henry references St. Crispin in the beginning and end of this section of speech, surrounding his main points with the idea of this saint.
King Henry VIII sought to protect his dignity by sustaining the Tudor reign. He was both prideful and greedy in character; which is supported by his determination in producing a male heir. He was so determined, he was willing to do anything - including betraying, divorcing and beheading his wives. In addition, Henry VIII was a strong participant in the Feudal System. Life in the Medieval castle was directed by the pyramid-shaped Feudal System.
He is able to inspire, intimidate, motivate, arouse and persuade, just by using his words. In the speeches he gives before battles, Henry is able to inspire his men for battle. One way he does this is by painting visions of the future. For example, in his St. Crispin’s day speech, he promises that “He that outlives this day, and comes safe home” will have a day in their honour. This is effective in motivating his men to fight hard and win the battle.
Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.
Henry’s temper is hard for him to control because he is sometimes faced with situations when he cannot distinguish between King Henry and friend Henry. This duality, paired with the duality that is being a king is an obvious cause for confusion and rage. Henry had such a strong bond with his old friends, that when his new friends were so quick to betray him he was deeply hurt. Another time Henry exhibits incomplete control of his temper is during the battle of Agincourt. Throughout the battle, Henry’s soldiers have taken many French soldiers prisoner and seem to have the advantage.
Honor in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One (The View of Honor in the Eyes of Falstaff and Hotspur in Shakespeare’s Play Henry IV, Act One) In Shakespeare’s play, Henry IV, Part One, two characters define what honor is to them. Hotspur and Falstaff are two different characters completely, one is a son of a nobleman and the other is a thief. Hotspur is son to Earl of Northumberland, making him the heir as well, the nephew of Earl of Worcester, and a good warrior too. The real name of Hotspur is Harry Percy, a member of the Percy family, which helped King Henry IV gain his power.
