ipl-logo

King Henry Viii's Role In The Feudal System

550 Words3 Pages

King Henry VIII sought to protect his dignity by sustaining the Tudor reign. He was both prideful and greedy in character; which is supported by his determination in producing a male heir. He was so determined, he was willing to do anything - including betraying, divorcing and beheading his wives. In addition, Henry VIII was a strong participant in the Feudal System. Life in the Medieval castle was directed by the pyramid-shaped Feudal System. This was based on the opinion that the land belonged to God - but that the kings, who governed by Divine Right, controlled the land as they pleased. Henry VIII used this system to his advantage; he eradicated anyone who got in his way. This included but is not limited to, his wife, Anne Boleyn, Pope Clement …show more content…

Throughout the Middle Ages, the king possessed the greatest amount of power and influence in all of England, right after the Pope of course. In view of this, Henry VIII was able to control the fate of his six wives. He was desperate for an heir to the throne and insisted on divorcing his first wife, but “the pope refused to grant a divorce” (Hung). His “efforts to divorce Catherine,” soon “became a parting of the ways for the English political elite” (David 420). In view of this, Henry VIII was so determined to get his way that “he started a church of his own. He got his divorce and stayed on the throne” (Hung). In addition to the fall of Queen Catherine, others were punished for dishonoring the king’s commands. This included, the king’s Minister, Cardinal Wolsey, who “failed to get the divorce from Rome” (David 420 ). Evidently, Henry VIII was willing to do anything it took to get rid of people who dissatisfied him. This connects to the Code of Chivalry because similar to the relationship between knights and their King, Henry VII expected his wives and court members to maintain their loyalty. In other words, those who did not follow through with their responsibilities, were

Show More
Related
924 Words | 4 Pages

The birth of Henry Tudor, later known as Henry VIII, took place on June 28th, 1491, in London, England. He was one of 6 other siblings born to Henry VII and Elizabeth York, but only 3 of his siblings survived their childhood. Though Henry’s brother, Arthur, was expected to ascend to the throne, he died at the young age of 15, leaving the throne to Henry. When Henry was 17 years old, he married Arthur’s widow, Catherine of Aragon, after Pope Julius II granted a dispensation to Catherine’s previous marriage on grounds that it had not been consummated. They remained married for 24 years until Henry divorced her because she was unable to give him a male heir, which was incredibly important because of the War of Roses that lasted 30 years, of which nobody wanted a duplicate.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

Meanwhile, Henry VIII had broken from the Roman Catholic Church establishing himself as Head of the Church of England. He closed monasteries, sold church lands thereby increasing royal revenues. These outlandish actions of Henry and Luther led to years of controversy and ill will among the churches. Nevertheless, Luther’s protests prevailed in the end, ultimately bringing protestant reform to

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

One of the reasons Cromwell made reforms to England in the 1530s was that there was still opposition to Henry being Supreme Head of the Church. It was important to have everyone on the king’s side, because without that his ideas would be ignored. Contradicting views would be discussed and spread widely between friends and acquaintances who would spread the information even more. The largest problem was when public figures expressed their opinions. For example, Elizabeth Barton was a nun who was widely respected and believed to have apparitions of G-d.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

He values loyalty to family over loyalty to the King, and thus joins in Glendower and companies plot to overthrow Henry IV. Given the legitimacy issues tied up with the death of Richard, Henry IV’s predecessor this is an interesting decision to make, given the complications

Read More
1127 Words | 5 Pages

How successful was Henry in restoring royal authority by 1170? Henry had the essential and perilous task of restoring royal authority. Under Stephen it could be deemed that there was little or no royal authority in place so when Henry came to power he had to lay down the basic fundamentals before he made serious drastic changes.

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

  Following the Battle of Bosworth of 1485, it was indisputable that Henry needed to establish new means of controlling the size and power of the nobility to levels which posed no threat to the throne. The Wars of the Roses 1455-85 resulted in 30 years of instability for England and thus Henry’s accession to the throne saw him take control of a fragmented country in which the crown was weak yet the nobility strong. Henry initially diluted noble power through the Act of Attainder which seized the titles and possessions of nobles suspected of disloyalty whilst simultaneously ensuring obedience as members of the nobility stood to lose everything should they be attained. Moreover, Henry was prepared to reverse an attainder if it would secure future loyalty evident in the fact that of the 138 attainders passed, 46 were later reversed.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

During the Middle Ages, the church and state leaders had many conflicts but more specifically the Holy Roman Emperor Heinrich (Henry) IV and the Pope Gregory VII during the eleventh century. Popes during those times were the head of the Catholic Church and basically had the entire power over Europe and churches. The investiture controversy became known as the lay investiture controversy as one of the most important conflicts between the secular and religious powers in medieval Europe. This all started by one simple question, of who would have the control over the bishops and who had the most control of the state. However, Holy Roman emperors, had to struggle to keep/maintain their power in what is now Germany, facing many princes and dukes

Read More
1430 Words | 6 Pages

King Henry demonstrates to his men that he himself is not unwilling to die for England’s “cause”, and that such a death is honorable; establishing his character as belonging to a man who will not ask any other man to do that which he is not willing to do himself, to his men. This has an interesting effect on the

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

Henry V grew up amidst tavern people before he became King, because of the way he was raised he was able to convey well with all of his men unconcerned of their rank or status. Henry was in a position where he had around 10,000 soldiers that were worn down and in a mindset of defeat already, compared to the 50,000 fresh French soldiers. His speech was the turning point in the war and this was before the battle started thanks to the way he was able to make all of his men feel equal and accounted for causing a victory in the battle. But we will be remembered’d; We few, we happy few, we band of brother; For he to-day that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

Read More
1191 Words | 5 Pages

This gave a summation of how Henry never actually aligned with the views of the Reformers, he just wanted to bring down the power of the papacy in Rome for his own personal

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout Henry V’s speech to his men before the Battle of Agincourt, he demonstrates the many ways in which he makes all of his men feel valued despite their social or military rank. The setting of his speech takes place in England where the heavily outnumbered English are fighting against the favored French army. The day of the battle was a holiday called the “Feast of Crispian”. During the speech Henry says general references that apply to all of the men like “gods will” and “our country”. He uses the phrase “we” and “our” a lot as well to signify that all of the men are fighting together on the same side.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

King Henry is portrayed to us as the main leader within the English ranks and an important component of their strategy. One characteristic of Henry’s leadership is that he is able to forge close connections with his men. During the Battle of Harfleur, we see him describe his men as “dear

Read More
1093 Words | 5 Pages

Shakespeare’s play, Henry V, portrays the newly crowned king of England, King Henry V, as a committed, fearless, and relentless leader. France is England’s archenemy and their relationship only worsens after the Dauphin delivers a mocking message to England’s new king. The Dauphin frequently ridicules the English and King Henry, whereas, the King of France, Charles VI, does not underestimate Henry and his people as his son does. (Source B) Throughout the play, the two leaders display their differences in terms of personality, leadership, communication skills, and ethics.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Henry’s temper is hard for him to control because he is sometimes faced with situations when he cannot distinguish between King Henry and friend Henry. This duality, paired with the duality that is being a king is an obvious cause for confusion and rage. Henry had such a strong bond with his old friends, that when his new friends were so quick to betray him he was deeply hurt. Another time Henry exhibits incomplete control of his temper is during the battle of Agincourt. Throughout the battle, Henry’s soldiers have taken many French soldiers prisoner and seem to have the advantage.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Henry showed a charismatic athleticism and a very diverse appetite for art, music, and culture. On top of that Henry was very witty and highly educated, being that he was the second in the Tudor Dynasty. He also enjoyed to gamble and joust and hosted many tournaments and banquets. Body 2: Career: Henry’s older brother Arthur was expected to take

Read More

More about King Henry Viii's Role In The Feudal System

Related Topics

Open Document