We can now see the identification of Adam with Solomon in this passage: “Within the context of Milton’s allusion to Solomon in his portrayal of Adam…Eve is analogized as one of the Solomon’s wives in order to comment in the idolatrous nature of Adam’s disobedience” (Lim, 120). Similar to King Solomon’s downfall, Adam is portrayed to have committed sin because of Eve’s actions. Adam says: “Certain my resolution is to die; / How can I live without thee, how forgo / Thy sweet converse and love so dearly joined, / To live again in these wild wood forlorn? (Milton, 9.907-10). Since Adam can’t stand to watch Eve suffer or be without her, Adam eats from the tree as well. Adam eats the fruits because Eve did first, so therefore if it hadn’t been for Eve’s weakness that Milton portrays, the downfall could have been prevented. Moreover, the consequence of their actions: painful child birth and submitting to their husbands, for women and ill fertile grounds for men, is in an essence similar to King Solomon’s punishment. They both get things taken away from them that in the beginning were granted to them by God. In this allusion, Eve is compared to the poorly influencing wives of Solomon since they both led to the downfall of man. Overall, King Solomon and Adam …show more content…
The usage of the word “dalliance,” alludes to both Solomon’s relationships and Satan’s actions with Eve. “Satan intrudes into this beautiful garden and dallies with Eve in a demonic parody of Solomon and his bride, intoxicating her reason” (Lim, 119). The reference to King Solomon and his wife suggest a similar portrayal of the beautiful Eden where Satan finds Eve alone. King Solomon held many brief and casual and sexual relationships with all his wives. Similarly, Satan partook in a brief involvement with Eve in the garden. He flattered her into sinning. Both these actions occur in a garden and in both instances, someone is being falsely conversed