Kitty Genovese The Bystander Effect

450 Words2 Pages

This article is about the murder of Kitty Genovese that occurred in 1964 in Queens, New York. There were 38 witnesses who saw or heard what was happening, but no one took any action to help or call for help, leading to the belief of the bystander effect. 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? The Speaker of this article is Martin Gansberg. The public is the audience. It is the bystander effect that is being conveyed in the message. In the message, it was emphasized that we should take action and help when we come across someone in need, underscoring the reality of the bystander effect in this situation. Informing people on why it is important to take action when we see a crime taking place was the purpose. The implication of this article is the negative effects of bystander effect. The genre is a narrative. The logos in this narrative show how this is a real situation that occurred where a murder took place and 38 people saw and didn’t intervene. The narrative’s ethos makes us contemplate whether we would help or be affected by the bystander effect. The pathos here is that this story leads us to be frustrated and confused about why no one helped the kitty. The context is that this story is bringing the bystander effect to light and raising awareness of it. …show more content…

What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? I feel as if the requisite was used the most. Kitty Genovese's murder was shocking and none of the witnesses helped. Martin Gansberg felt the need to put this story out in the light. They used this component the most to stress this

More about Kitty Genovese The Bystander Effect