ipl-logo

Korematsu V. Us Case Study

932 Words4 Pages

Korematsu v. United States On December 7, 1941, Japanese forces lead an intensive bombing raid on a US military naval base in Oahu, Hawaii, west of Honolulu. The results were devastating with thousands dead and the US Pacific fleet almost crippled. America was astonished and afterwards, outraged. Mistakes in the Japanese bombing raid allowed the US Navy to rebound relatively quickly and effectively fight back Japanese forces. Meanwhile in wartime America, civil life had been distinctly altered. The economy shifted to support the war effort, propoganda was injected into the entertainment industry, and the government overlooked political matters that in times of peace, would generally be found to be unconstitutional. On February 19, 1942, Executive …show more content…

The Fourth Amendment declares “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The two main points being the “lack of probable cause” and the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects”. It should be noted that due to the hastiness of the relocation, many Japanese-Americans made ill-prepared financial decisions that led to an unnecessary loss of money, possessions, and land, in which some of it that was lost is now valued to be worth millions of dollars. While the government claimed there was evidence of some Japanese-American involvement in espionage, there was no concrete accusation put forth. In, addition some Japanese-Americans left their families behind in the internment camps to go and fight in the US armed forces during World War II. The U.S. Army’s 100th Battalion, 442nd Infantry which consisted exclusively of Japanese-American fought in France, Italy, and Germany from 1943 to 1945 and by the end of the war became the most decorated combat unit of its size in Army

Show More
Related
1119 Words | 5 Pages

Korematsu v. United States After the United States entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. Fred Korematsu was a natural born citizen to Japanese immigrant parents. Korematsu refused to obey the curfew and was charged and convicted of violating order 9066. He appealed this conviction and the Supreme Court took his case.

Read More
257 Words | 2 Pages

One reason why the U.S government’s decision was not justifiable is because many of the Japanese-Americans were innocent people who legally received their American citizenship. For example, in Monica Sone’s “Camp Harmony”,

Read More
1633 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction The attack on Pearl Harbour occurred before World War Two, on December 7th 1941, when Japan launched a pre-emptive strike against the United States of America. Pearl Harbour, in Hawaii, was attacked, and 20 naval vessels, as well as 300 airplanes, were destroyed. The Japanese did this because the American government had imposed sanctions and trade embargoes upon Japan as a result of Japan declaring war on China and attempting to take over China’s import market, in order to solve its demographic and economic issues.2 This prompted the American congress to vote to join World War Two, two years after it had begun.2 My research task aims to discover whether or not Japan’s actions are justified.

Read More
163 Words | 1 Pages

As opposed to righteous view that America was safeguarding its position in the war, the Japanese American internments were created out of resentment and racial prejudice fostered by other Americans. As the article “Personal Justice Denied” stated, the internments were led by “widespread ignorance of Japanese Americans contributed to a policy conceived in haste and executed in an atmosphere of fear and anger at Japan” (Doc E, 1983). It may seem like a precautionary cause to make internments but there aren’t any other extreme measures for other fronts. Caused by a hatred stirred by media and society’s view, many people disdain the Japanese.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

There has been a domino effect of racist events against Japanese-Americans, including having to face bigotry, people (white Americans) that have an irrational fear of people descending from another country (Japanese-Americans), and racism since President Franklin Roosevelt signed the Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942 . Bigotry, xenophobia, and racism impair the Japanese-American community. Not only did the forced evacuation of Japanese people in Hawaii and on the West Coast lead to unconstitutional imprisonment of 120,000 people, two thirds of whom were US-born citizens, but it also represented a failure of the country’s democracy by denying American citizens their rights granted by the U.S. Constitution . Because the Japanese-Americans were born in the United States, their U.S. citizenship was their birthright and was supposed to protect them; however, this was not the case and the loss of their property, unjust detainment because of a “national security risk”, and loss of their citizen status humiliated the American born citizens of Japanese immigrants. The US government purposely violated the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution and although since WWII the Japanese-Americans have been apologized to and the U.S. has admitted it was a mistake to detain these citizens, debate over the legitimacy of the 14th amendment now exists .

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

The relocation of Japanese into internment camps was necessary for national security and protection for the people, but it ignored the fact that many Japanese citizens and noncitizens alike had to leave much of their homes, valuables, and assets behind, lived in horrible conditions in the camps, isolated them from everyone, and disrupted their lives greatly. Simply, relocating 120,000 people to a different location was overboard. Military personnels at the defense bases and factories could easily restrain any people from approaching the bases and facilities. They could also tell the Japanese people or Asian race in general apart from the white Americans since anybody of Japanese ancestry was easily recognizable. Moreover, every citizen was already told advised to report any suspicious persons or activities to the government for investigation after the incident at Pearl Harbor.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

The government then imprisoned over 100,000 Japanese Americans in internment camps in fear of them becoming traitors. They had also taken any radios and kept them away from the coast. Japanese american men were allowed to fight in the war but only in europe not in the pacific. The japanese americans made supplies for the troops when they were in the camps. The camps were crowded and provided poor living conditions.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Supreme Court Record “Part Three of the Brief” it states, “There was ample ground to believe that imminent danger then existed of an attack by Japan upon the West Coast.” (206) This was mainly believed because the area had a large amount of war facilities and production which could have assisted in their belief of having the internment policy. Also, a factual claim that pro-internment advocates expressed was that through the “existence of media” Japan have attempted or had attempted to secure war aims. (206)

Read More
236 Words | 1 Pages

Facts: President Roosevelt acted to prevent occurrence of subversion and espionage from people of Japanese ancestry residing in the United States. Roosevelt announced two executive orders that quickly became a law. The first one permitted the Secretary of War the power to appoint specific areas of the country as military areas and also exclude others from the area. The second created the War Relocation Authority that had the authority to remove and supervise people that were excluded from the areas. Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi, a student attending University of Washington, was found guilty of infringing a curfew and relocation command.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The Japanese-Americans were innocent and were unfairly taken into confinement. Their rights were taken away on a discriminatory note. Their treatment was

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The internment of Japanese-Americans in the US was completely unjust and violated the constitutional rights of many. It classified the Japanese as ‘dangerous aliens’ as they were unrightfully sent sent from their homes to militarized locations under fear of espionage during WWII. ” The American Friends Service Committee (a Quaker group), and the Japanese-American community—countered that singling out a particular group for internment was an unconstitutional infringement of their liberty” (Japanese-American Internment). There were legal organizations against the interment under the proof that it was unconstitutional. This included American citizens targeted by their own government because of their ethnicities.

Read More
1699 Words | 7 Pages

How would you feel if one day you were told to leave your whole life behind to live in captivity just because people halfway across the world did something wrong? This horror story was all too true for the thousands of Japanese Americans alive during World War II. Almost overnight, thousands of proud Japanese Americans living on the west coast were forced to leave their homes and give up the life they knew. The United States government was not justified in the creation of Japanese internment camps because it stripped law-abiding American citizens of their rights out of unjustified fear.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

With this order, Roosevelt mandated to federal troops that between 110,00 and 120,000 Japanese Americans living on the West Coast be relocated into internment camps that were almost always in the middle of nowhere (Doc. 3). Japanese-Americans lost everything as a result of this; they had to quickly sell their homes and businesses within a matter of a few days and could only take what they could carry to the camps. This is solid proof that Japanese lost rights due to the war rather than being given an opportunity to advance economically or

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

The Japanese were not placed in internment due to their race/ancestry for three reasons: They were the ones responsible for their removal, Justice Black’s statement that “Exclusion of those of Japanese origins were deemed necessary because of the presence of unascertained number of disloyal members of the group, most of whom we have no doubt were loyal to this country” (Japanese Interment pg. 3) and because the United States were at war with the Japanese Empire. The first reason the Japanese were not placed in interment due to their race/ancestry was that they were the ones responsible for their removal. If the Japanese did not attack Pearl Harbor the United States would not have joined World War II in the first place. Roosevelt would not have created the War Relocation Authority to relocate them either. The Japanese-Americans also failed to voluntarily remove themselves from the West

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

What this text is trying say that Japanese Citizens and Japanese citizens who were also American rights were violated by President Roosevelt’s decision to authorize the internment on the Japanese citizens, however they wanted to protect civilians from the potential threat of the Japanese. The term Internment basically means to be sent to prison without a trial from a court of Law. Based upon the evidence this is why some people feel that the U.S. government has the right to take certain constitutional right in order to prevent any harm being

Read More

More about Korematsu V. Us Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document