4. From the list of verbs, select the operations. 6-5 Short Paper:
There are five main literary lenses: genetic, formal, transactional, sociocultural, and text to text. The first lens, genetic, looks at how the author relates to the book. This usually reflects on how the author came up with the idea for their book. Laurie Halse Anderson usually finds inspiration in people who are going through difficult life situations. The inspiration for Speak came from two places in particular.
In 1832, a young African American woman, Maria W. Stewart, rose to address a Boston audience. In her lecture, Stewart uses her intellect and passion to call for equal rights for African American citizens. Her lecture employs brilliant rhetorical strategies to support her position. Stewart is successful in her passionately expressive calling for an end to African American discrimination through her use of diction and figurative language.
Many people have difficulty writing and the Pulitzer Prize-winning critic, author, and lecturer, Michael Dirda, can support that. Flaw-speckled writing is dealt with over and over again by everyone who aims to write, and in the article written for the Browsings column entitled, “Language Matters”, Michael Dirda explains just that. In Dirda’s article which aims to show what goes into a piece, how it all fits, and the large amount of work needed, he describes the struggles of the modern author when writing. Directed to the readers of The American Scholar, Dirda uses many examples of rhetorical strategies such as outstanding word choice and the audience’s self-interest.
Florence Kelley was a women’s rights activist who gave a speech before the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in the summer of 1905 on the topic of child labor. This speech on child labor offers insight to the harsher lives that some children have to carry in comparison to some adults due to no child labor laws. Kelley’s writing was meant to persuade the audience to improve child labor laws and safety by appealing to pathos. Throughout the beginning of the essay, there’s repetition of the phrase: “[W]hile we sleep.”
In her speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association convention in 1905, United States social worker and reformer, Florence Kelley addresses the ills of child labor that that nation has turned a blind eye to. Throughout the speech, Kelley calls attention to the unethical conditions that children are forced to work under and prompts voters to use their power to vote for stricter child labor laws. She adopts a critical tone in order to unify her audience against unethical labor practices, and encourages those who can vote to be a voice for women and children. Kelley employs emotive imagery to highlight the injustices of child labor, repetition of phrases to suggest the nation’s negligence to the reality of child labor, and rhetorical
Rhetorical Devices and Strategies Impact on Child Labor Speeches are an effective way to communicate big ideas and changes to a select audience. The human to human connection that speeches provide is vital to the speaker's ability to get a point across. But speeches can also be dull, and empty. They require the use of rhetorical devices to catch the audience’s attention and create meaning. In 1905, prominent social reformer Florence Kelley delivered a speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association regarding the use of child labor in the nation.
Individuals in society are obligated to speak up in support of those who do not have a voice. Around the beginning of the 1900s, child labor was instituted on a large scale, as children did not need to be guaranteed the same treatment as adults. Several people argued for child protection such as Florence Kelley, who was a United States social worker and reformer who has spoken out against child labor. In the speech delivered to the National American Suffrage Convention, Kelley argues that children are being exploited to work in harsh conditions with little to no protection in legislation. Florence Kelley utilizes a sentimental story that invokes the reader to sympathize with the children, provides examples of the lack of state laws for child
The reason why I want to be part of the National English Honor Society is because English is my favorite subject. Since I was young, I have always been the reader in my family and it has always been one of my best subjects in school. Ever since I was young, I have always been the reader in my family. Reading has been my escape from the stress of school and work and is an outlet for me to relax. I often imagine myself as the character of the stories and try to figure out what I would do if I was the character in real life.
In her writing, Tan often describes her experiences as the child of Chinese immigrants, growing up in northern California and living in American culture. Tan explains how she has learned to embrace the many Englishes her mother speaks and how her background has also caused her to have different Englishes. While others classify her mother's English as "broken" she finds no fault in it. In Tan's view, just because something is broken does not necessarily mean that it is in need of fixing. In her essay, author Amy Tan addresses the connections between languages and cultures in describing the different Englishes her mother uses.
In reading Lamott’s essay I found myself compelled to keep reading. It was the first time I read an article on how to be a better writer that basically says, do your worse work, and then learn from it. Interestingly enough there are components in her article that I can relate too such as in paragraph five where she discusses the initial writing and not being able to start the writing process. I can relate to this because when writing I sometimes stare at the computer screen thinking of the right words to open my essay with, even though I have ideas for other parts of the paper I am left stuck at the start line. Overall her article brought a type of excitement to me as I read it, almost as if it has given me hope for writing, especially with the thought of a five page paper lingering in the back of my mind.
In Lera Boroditsky 's "How Does Our Language Shape the Way We Think" the purpose of the essay is apparent from the second paragraph. "Language is a uniquely human gift central to our experience of being human" she explains, so that the reader understands how language affects ones thoughts and day to day lives (2). Boroditsky 's use of empirical evidence, factual information, organizational structure, understanding and construction upon thoughts that disprove her purpose, and light tone all aide in accomplishing her purpose. Each of these methods help convince the audience that, " Language is central to our experience of being human, and the languages we speak profoundly shapes the way we think, the way we see the world, the way we live our lives" (Boroditsky 10).
It is prima facie evidence of linguistic flexibility, proof of the great dexterity of the human mind. (Pincott,
The Language Culture and Society programme provides us with strong theoretical and interdisciplinary foundation for the study of a range of educational practices across the human lifespan and in a range of theoretical and methodological perspective is brought to bear on studies that explore the nature of literate practices, democracy and civic engagement and participation in social life. The programme focuses on relationships between education school and the dynamics and changing structures of language, culture, and society. It examines connection between broader, social, cultural, linguistic, historical, aesthetic and political factors in education and the local context in which these issues take place. It has long been recognized that language is an essential and important part of a given culture and that the impact of culture upon a given language is something intrinsic and indispensible. Language is a social phenomenon.
