In her speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association convention in 1905, United States social worker and reformer, Florence Kelley addresses the ills of child labor that that nation has turned a blind eye to. Throughout the speech, Kelley calls attention to the unethical conditions that children are forced to work under and prompts voters to use their power to vote for stricter child labor laws. She adopts a critical tone in order to unify her audience against unethical labor practices, and encourages those who can vote to be a voice for women and children. Kelley employs emotive imagery to highlight the injustices of child labor, repetition of phrases to suggest the nation’s negligence to the reality of child labor, and rhetorical …show more content…
In the third paragraph, Kelly describes how on a given night “several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms.” This auditory imagery is intended to portray the painfully loud noises created by the machinery that young children are forced to work among. Additionally, Kelley depicts “a girl of six or seven years, just tall enough to reach the bobbins,” who may spend the whole night working in a factory. This image emphasizes how incredibly young and small many working girls are, making child labor unsafe and unethical. Florence Kelley’s use of such emotive imagery moves the audience to pity working …show more content…
Firstly, Florence Kelley asks, “if the mothers and the teachers in Georgia could vote, would the Georgia Legislature have refused at every session for the last three years to stop the work in the mills of children under twelve years of age?” In this rhetorical question, the speaker acknowledges that women cannot yet vote, so she is placing the repsonsibility to end child labor on those with the power of the ballot. Similarly, in the second-to-last paragraph, Kelley poses a question that asks “what can we do to free our consciences?” in reference to the guilt that the audience feels as bystanders of child labor. She then suggests the solution of “enlist[ing] the workingmen voters,” to work towards stricter child labor laws, placing this responsibility in the hands of the audience. Kelley’s utilization of rhetorical questions calls the audience to contemplate their duty in the protection of working