Rhetorical Analysis On Florence Kelley

1020 Words5 Pages

Analysis on: Florence Kelley on Child Labor
Florence Kelly was a social worker who was passionate about restricting child labor laws, her work inspired her to fight for children. In 1905 Florence Kelly spoke to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, an audience that expected her to speak about women's suffrage. Surprisingly, Florence Kelley spoke to her audience about Child Labor laws, a strategy which captured their attention and evoked confusion and anger. As she continues into her speech the Women's Suffrage Association realizes that her message of Child Labor laws also reveals reasons for women's right to vote. Despite her semi-relevant topic, Florence Kelly is purposeful in the structure of her speech as she begins with confusion, …show more content…

The women have a distinct emotion of being confused, but Florence Kelley isn’t going to evoke more emotion yet, instead she will proceed to manipulate their confusion with logic to highlight her claim. Florence Kelley transitions into an illuminating position in her third paragraph, she says, “Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to buy”(Kelley paragraph 3). While she illuminates the problem, she also draws in the audience with her diction. The use of “We” ties in the introduction and shows how while they are fast asleep children are put in danger to provide their basic wants. Everyone is the problem including the women because their inability to vote doesn’t affect their duty to stop injustice. Kelley speaks more on this conviction within the next section and her explanation/illumination transition into …show more content…

Kelley makes choices to provoke anger within the Women's Suffrage Association as they grasp the seriousness of Child labor. She convicts the audience saying, " Until the mothers in the great industrial states are enfranchised, we shall none of us be able to free our consciences from participation in this great evil" (Kelley paragraph 9). Once again Kelley refers to the group using "we" which makes them realize it's their shared responsibility to change Child Labor. The word "great evil" creates restlessness within the minds of her audience and soon they become angry. Florence has completed her mission to illuminate the "great evil". The audience is angry and Florence uses the anger to her advantage as she says " If the mothers and the teachers in Georgia could vote, would the Georgia Legislature have refused at every session for the last three years to stop the work in the mills of children under twelve years of age" (Kelley paragraph 8). Once again she uses logic to highlight that Child Labor could have been restricted, but in this text she is moreso empowering the women. Even though she says this before evoking anger, the anger is already there and therefore the audience thinks back to her claim here. Florence Kelley is specific about the structure of her speech and knows when she has established