ipl-logo

Laura Allen And Eating Bugs Comparison

425 Words2 Pages

The texts “ Insect Farmers” by Washington Post and “ Eating Bugs” by Miguel Vilar and Laura Allen have both similarities and differences. First, both articles explain that bugs are healthy.For example, on page _22_ of “ Eating Bugs” the text states “Crickets and grasshoppers are loaded with carbohydrates...Termites, beetles, and earthworms are very high in protein”. Similarly, on paragraph 8 of “ Insect Farmers” it says “They pack a powerful protein-filled punch into a small, low-calorie package.”This is similar because they both explain in different ways how eating bugs are healthy for you.In both cases they believe that eating bugs are healthy for you.

A second similarity is that they both persuade.For example in paragraph 8 in “Insect Farmers” it says “ I initially got interested in eating bugs when I went to Thailand in 2006 ,” said Kevin Bachhuber , founder of Big Cricket Farms. “This is really delicious.” Also in paragraph 2 with subtitle “ Bugs To Go- the New Fast Food “ Eating insects would make the environment, too. WE kill billions of insects a year with strong poisons, called pesticides...They end up in rivers and kill fish and other living things.”This is similar because they both persuade you to eat bugs. In both cases they both show try to persuade you to eat bugs, and give you different reasons why you should eat bugs. …show more content…

One way the texts differ is because one of the texts only state the pros and the other states the pros and cons.On page 21-25 of “ Eat Your Bugs” the text states all the pros but never states any cons. In contrast, in the text of “Insect Farmers” it states pros and cons such as how bugs are healthy but we also need to think about the logistics of eating bugs.This information differs because one state's pros but the other says that we still need to think about the cons of eating bugs. In conclusion the two articles are different in this

Show More
Related
822 Words | 4 Pages

His grandmother responds, “If nothing matters, there’s nothing to save” (461). He seems to appeal to the readers feelings of compassion for his grandmother’s story to get the audience to agree with him. Even though it is not his only mode of argumentation he relies primarily on his emotional appeals to make his point. Next, his statistical evidence was incomplete. For example, “Eating factory-farmed animals--which is to say virtually every piece of meat sold in supermarkets and prepared in restaurants--is almost certainly the single worst thing that humans can do to the environment” (457).

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

One thing that is the same between the two would be what it’s based on or what each gives to explain. Both articles give facts and examples, all of which are science based. Another similarity that is shared between the articles is how and what they compared. Both articles compared how and why some plants can and cannot survive with a salty environment. Lastly, a similarity that can be found between the two articles how they presented their data.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

One way showing how they’re similar is the smaller subject of family separation and how it affects the children. This is related to the thesis because the authors mention the subject of family separation in twain of the texts. Another example of a similarity between the two texts is how they focus on making decisions that are best for the children, and not necessarily for themselves. This relates to the thesis because the authors both have their mindset based on the children and what’s best for them, which shows the author 's perspective on this matter. The final example of a similarity between the texts is how the two texts are based off real-life events.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The Omnivore’s Dilemma. Through the addition of each section and detail, Pollan slowly gains a basis for his argument. An argument that challenges the very way in what and how we eat. And one that sheds light into the industrialized food chain. Essentially, his argument is to be aware of what we are eating.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

The author's use of a compare/contrast structure and the appeal to ethos to support her claim was effective. However, her use of the hasty generalization and “Red Herring” fallacies caused the audience to doubt her claim, that meat from traditional farms was better for the environment, had sufficient evidence to

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

In his essay consider the Lobster; it is apparent what Wallace is trying to tell the reader: we should really think about the lobster before or while consuming it.wallace uses many rhetorical strategies to prove his point of view. His use of rhetorical strategies puts the readers in thinking and captures the argument of many vegetarians against the consumption of animals. Wallace explores about the lobsters. He begins by giving a brief explanation about the loaine lobster festival and brief introduction about lobster, what lobster actually is.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

“Thou shouldst eat to live; not live to eat”, is a famous quote by the well known philosopher Socrates, who believed this is the perspective we should take when we are eating food. Unfortunately, the times have changed and so has the way we eat. We no longer have to go hunting for our food, or grow crops to receive all of our fruits and vegetables. Because we have become a society that has grown into the new world of technology, there would be no need to rely on ourselves for what we need-- we can simply gather our resources from other people. In the book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma”, written by Michael Pollan, takes us on a journey full of concerns of the “Food Industrial Complex”.

Read More
1521 Words | 7 Pages

By doing this, it makes his final statements all the more effective and thought-provoking since the audience is subconsciously making the connection between how dogs should be treated as food and how other animals are currently being treated as food. Yet, he hides this connection under the guise of a harmless argument for the consumption of dogs, making his final argument a realization, of sorts, for the reader. The sudden shift of focus from

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

to tell his audience: we should really think about the lobster’s point of view before consuming it. David Foster Wallace uses a multitude of rhetorical strategies to get his point across, including pathos and ethos. His essay is ingenious in how it gets its point across, and how it forces even the largest lobster consumers to truly contemplate how the lobster might react to its consumption. It brings up many controversial topics of animal rights that many people tend to avoid, especially people who are major carnivores. Wallace’s use of rhetorical strategies really gets the reader thinking, and thoroughly captures the argument of many vegetarians against the consumption of animals.

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

One difference clearly shown is in the short film “Tales of the Unexpected” Billy reacts to the tea, however in the story he does not. In the film, Billy reacted very ferociously and crazily because of the poisonous tea, however in the story he did not react to it at all. I think the screenwriter alters the story to emphasize that the tea was poisonous. Another difference in the film is the screenwriter reveals Mulholland and Temple are in the house taxidermied. In the passage the ending is billy drinking the tea, however the film ends with the landlady revealing Mulholland and Temple are taxidermied and Billy is about to be.

Read More
422 Words | 2 Pages

In the butterfly Pavl dies in the city of Oswiecim by the Nazi’s. In Krystyna’s story the whole family ends up to survive WW2. In the story it says ¨One day we heard a strong knocking on the sewer grates. These were our sewer workers who told us that we were free.¨ In the Butterfly the guy lives in the ghetto for seven weeks. In the story it states,For seven weeks I've lived in here.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

This shows that in both stories workers show up to save the birds. This confirms that both stories have a similar conflict.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

If we send out the cultural message, I believe people would be much calmer about consuming bugs. Additionally we can send out the message that you do not have to just eat the bug by itself; you can do what is commonly done now, grinding them up into your favorite food. That way, you can obtain the high protein from the big as well as eating

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

Although the thought of eating bugs is revolting, they’re pretty tasty. That’s crazy right? Eating bugs isn’t that bad, as long as you have the right person to cook it. Just

Read More

More about Laura Allen And Eating Bugs Comparison

Related Topics

Open Document