ipl-logo

Legal Burden Of Proof

2248 Words9 Pages

Question 1 (1)
The burden of proof means obligation to prove. There are two principle kinds of burden in legal trial; they are
• legal burden
• evidential burden.
Legal Burden
The legal burden can be defined as the obligation imposed on a party by a rule of law to prove a fact in issue in order to convince the court. It is also known as persuasive burden. In criminal proceedings in relation to presumption of innocence provided by article 6(2) of European Convention on Human Rights states until proved guilty accused is presumed innocence. The golden thread principle stated by Woolmington v DPP states prosecution should prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the legal burden remains there throughout the trial. . further Lord Sankey …show more content…

Lak attended at the property harassed the tenants continuously, contrary to the terms of the order. So it can be said he is guilty of an offence. But the appellant case was that he went to collect the rent arrears.
Prosecution should prove that Lak breached the ASBO according to criminal standard beyond reasonable doubt. The legal burden lies with the prosecution then the standard of proof required is beyond reasonable doubt. Also prosecution has the evidential burden to establish a prima facie case.
Lak could be prosecuted for the breach of order under Section 1 (10). But if the defendant raises the evidential issue on defence of reasonable excuse then the legal burden was on the prosecution to prove that the defendant acted without reasonable excuse.
The case Charles held “applying the test in Edwards and Hunt when the defendant had raised the evidence of reasonable excuse the legal burden of disproving rests with the …show more content…

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) section 82 (1) defines confession as “including ‘any statement wholly or partly adverse to the person who made it. Section 76 (1) states a confession made by an accused person may be given in evidence against him. Confession can be excluded on the grounds of mandatory or discretionary exclusions.
Section 76(2) which deals with mandatory exclusion provide that prosecution should prove, beyond reasonable doubt that the confession that was not obtained by Oppression or in circumstances of unreliability.
Section 76(8) defines oppression as including torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or the use of threat of violence. Torture, inhuman or degrading treatment is also prohibited by Article 3 of the ECHR. Saadi v Italy held ill treatment must attain a minimum level of severity to fall in the Article 3. It depends on all the situations of the case; duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and state of health of victim and it should go beyond the usual humiliation during the legal

Show More
Related

15-6 Investigation Report

2497 Words | 10 Pages

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, 75th Ranger Regiment, Fort Benning, GA 31905 SUBJECT: AR 15-6 Investigation Findings and Recommendations 1. FINDINGS: The following are the findings of this investigation into the events of Saturday 12 MAR 16 and Sunday 13 MAR 16, leading to the arrest of 1LT Paul Handelman (Platoon Leader, Bravo Company, 2d Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment) by Korean National Police (KNP). 1LT Handelman is suspected of: violating General Order #1, violating the United States Forces Korea (USFK) curfew policy, violating a direct order from his Company Commander (Co CDR) CPT Ferriter, assaulting a KNP Officer, causing property damage to a Korean National, and of being drunk and disorderly. This investigation also illuminates the actions of CPT Soren Jorgensen (Executive Officer, Bravo Company, 2d Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment) who was with 1LT

Read More

Case: Lachance Vs Erickson

184 Words | 1 Pages

The employees were sanctioned for the underlying charges and the charge of giving the false statements. Holding of the Court: The court ruled in favor of La Chance because agencies

Read More

What Are The Similarities Between O. J. Simpson And Lizzie Borden

945 Words | 4 Pages

The cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.

Read More

Summary Of Sam Mara Conspiracy Case

1037 Words | 5 Pages

A reasonable jury when faced with the evidence would find it difficult to render a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt favorable to the State. Clayton, 235 S.W.3d at 778

Read More

Court Case Of Harold James Blackburn

1230 Words | 5 Pages

The reliability and admissibility of evidence becomes a foundation to this truth as any evidence presented cannot contain elements which can provide doubt towards the validity of the prosecution. This can be shown through guideline 14 of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions agreement to provide advice for the NSW police towards the legal limitations or consequences of evidence obtained during the course of an investigation (Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions n.d). Identification evidence in particular has a lower weight and strength for admission to a court due to the fallibility and circumstantial nature of witnesses. The admissibility of identification evidence was previously determined by judges based on its quality with case law such as R v. Christie providing principles for discretionary powers for admissibility and Alexander v. R providing methods satisfactory to the court for identification such as identification parades under common law. (R v. Christie 1914; Alexander v. R 1981).

Read More

Not Guilty In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

727 Words | 3 Pages

Because the evidence that was shown failed to meet the burden of proof and raise reasonable doubt the defendant must be found not

Read More

Prison Litigation Reform Act Case Study

1661 Words | 7 Pages

Fire Eagle Engine Co., 332 F. 3d 264, 271 (4th Cir. 2003) (emphasis added) (internal citations and some internal quotation marks omitted.) The defendant bears the burden of pleading and proof as to an affirmative defense. See, e.g., Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 90 (2008)(“Ordinarily, it is incumbent on the defendant to plead and prove [an affirmative] defense.” ; Moore, 527 F.3d at 725 (citing Jones, supra, 549 U.S. 199); McNeil v. Polk, 476 F.3d 206, 220 n.3 (4th Cir.

Read More

Examples Of Evidence In The Crucible

807 Words | 4 Pages

Unreasonable evidence is used and justice is not served, but injustice

Read More

If Mr. Jones And Cut-Rate Liquor, Was Intoxicated?

1006 Words | 5 Pages

An Opening Your Honor, the opposing counsel, members of the jury, this case is about the unreliability of evidence and an insufficiency to meet the burden of proof that is required to convict Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor with a violation of Nita Liquor Commission Regulation 3.102. This case is to be decided on four issues: 1) Knowledge. Whether the Defendant, Mr. Jones and Cut-Rate Liquor, knew or ought to have known that the customer, Mr. Watkins, was intoxicated? 2) Sale.

Read More

Child Protection And Permanency (DCPP)

1171 Words | 5 Pages

Id. The court examines a variety of sources of extrinsic evidence, such as the legislative history and legislative intent. Id. at 310. The court started by analyzing the plain language of N.J.S.A. 9:6-8.21(c)(4)(b) which does not imply that when a parent fails to perform a cautionary act does not mean it is abuse or neglect. Id. at 307.

Read More

Due Process Model And Crime Control Model In The Criminal Justice System

909 Words | 4 Pages

A comparison between the Due process model and crime control model Within the criminal justice system, there are two competing models: the crime control model and the due process model. These two models were constructed by Robert Packer and each represents a particular school of thought. In managing crime, there is the individual i.e. the suspect and there is the society. The due process model is seen to focus on the suspect whereas the crime control model focuses on the society. This paper analyzes these two models and based on the rate of crime in the society, makes recommendations as to which is the best model in criminal justice.

Read More

Criminally Responsible Law

1035 Words | 5 Pages

Should the Not Criminally Responsible Law Remain in Canada? As of 1992, the Canadian Criminal Justice system introduced a new Law to its Criminal Code. NCR stands for “Not Criminally Responsible.” It is defined in section 16 of the Criminal Code."

Read More

History Of The Bill Of Rights Essay

578 Words | 3 Pages

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common

Read More

The Importance Of The Fifth Amendment

480 Words | 2 Pages

The fifth amendment to the United States constitution should remain just as it is, meaning that no person should be forced to provide incriminating evidence against themselves. And to do so would go against the natural law of self preservation. But by not compelling a person to provide evidence against themselves offers one relief from perjury in order to preserve themselves. The speaker equates not answering to lying which is incorrect, the speakers strawman example of not answering a spouse is an untruth and is an unrealistic example.

Read More

Cardinal Principles Essay

1076 Words | 5 Pages

The prosecution bears the legal burden to prove the guilt of defendant beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases whereby the defendant bears the evidential burden

Read More

More about Legal Burden Of Proof

Related Topics

Open Document