ipl-logo

Liberalism In America's Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes

1564 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Thomas hobbes view of mankind

Since 1776, the United States of America has praised itself on its installment of a new kind of government, a representative democracy. The U.S. was built on the promises of natural rights for everyone and a tolerance of diversity, including religion. Thomas Hobbes, one of the founders of modern liberalism, opened the door for today’s democratic governments. In Hobbes’ Leviathan, he states that the natural state of humans, or state of nature, is a fearful, anarchic place. To leave this dark depiction of the state of nature, humans must enter into a social contract with an absolute sovereign. Hobbes believes that the sovereign must have absolute power over the lives of their people in order for their society to work. However, he also believes that humans must give up their natural rights and individualism in order gain the security that the absolute power of the sovereign offers. Hobbes’ liberalist ideals concerning absolute sovereignty is given to an assembly of people, the natural right of individuals, and tolerance of private religious diversity are the beginnings of the United States’ democratic government, however, Hobbes is …show more content…

He calls this the right of nature, which is the preservation of self. Hobbes explains that “the right of nature…is the liberty each man hath to use his own power as he will himself for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life; and consequently, of doing anything which, in his own judgement and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto” (79). In the state of nature, there is only one natural right, the preservation of self. However, Hobbes encourages people to abandon this natural right to instead enter into civil society. Once in civil society, civil rights can be installed in place of the right of nature, however, these are not believed to be natural rights, as the sovereign instills them and can take them away as he

Show More
Related
477 Words | 2 Pages

With this policy, land was divided into numerous small states, while simultaneously uniting them all in one nation. This then allowed for more independence among the people allowing them to choose their own institutions, including religion. Natural rights philosophers continued to support the natural world and the laws that govern it. Men like Hobbes and Locke introduced topics such as inalienable rights, including but not limited to, “Life, Liberty, and Estate.” All of these structures were later used in the creators development of the U.S., considering they were alive to watch all of these progressions occur before their very

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Hobbes believed that natural state of humans was violent and therefore needed order and control to ensure a just and equal society (Robinson 2016, 4). However Hobbes believed that a sovereign could maintain power without deceit and manipulation. Hobbes believed in the social contract which is when people could have a moral understanding about right and wrong to avoid the chaotic violent human nature. Hobbes believed in the idea of utilitarianism which would “maximize the most good and minimize the pain” (Robinson 201, 4). This would ensure that the sovereign was doing things for the right reasons and not to better himself but to better society as a

Read More
1283 Words | 6 Pages

Hobbes’ state of nature leads to the monarchic system of governance. He imagines a state of nature that encourages war of all against each other. Hobbes defends this by arguing that if the sovereign has little power, it can be made a subject to its own laws and this can cause havoc among people. Further, Hobbes believes that some men can outdo others. Therefore, this lack of sovereignty can lead to people destroying each other.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

by the sovereign, but this is infinitely better than worrying that anyone could do terrible things to you. In sum, Hobbes makes the argument that living in the state of nature leads to a miserable existence and agreeing to a social contract always increase one’s chance at leading a better

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

The Leviathan, written by Thomas Hobbes scrupulously argues that peace and unity among civilians and society can only be possible through the establishment of a commonwealth via a social contract According to Hobbes, any lasting political authority should be granted with absolute authority to ensure the well-being of the system. Throughout this essay I will identify and explain the main points of Hobbes’s argument against a divided authority, which he likens to a “Defectuous Procreation”. Firstly, Hobbes advocates that for a government (of any form) to be effective, they should possess absolute authority over all. The powers of legislation and enforcement for example must be neither divided nor limited.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

• Throughout The Leviathan, Hobbes presents his view of human nature and advocates for a social contract to The fear experienced in the state of nature is highly restrictive, preventing those involved from enjoying freedom and the right of self-preservation. To contrast, fear experienced under the sovereign is instrumental in protecting its citizens. By utilizing the threat of punishment, the sovereign is able to provide security against the power hungry nature of humans. Paragraph One: •

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

We chose these chapter as it offers his most direct discussion of religion and the sovereign power. Hobbes 's own views of religion are the subject, to some degree, of scholarly debate. He was strongly opposed to scholasticism and Roman Catholicism and trended toward materialism and rationalism in his overall philosophy. Nevertheless, he does argue that his form of political absolutism is well-suited to Christianity, even though many have

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

There is no room for revolt and the sovereign is absolute so that there are no fractures or splitting within the government or state. This is dangerous because if the government turns out to be or becomes corrupt, there is no way to fight this corruption. In the Leviathan, no matter the case people must submit to the State. If they do not abide, they risk harsh punishment. It is Hobbes’ belief that the State’s responsibility is to ensure peace and to protect its citizens and that it will follow through with that whether its power is attained through force, which he calls a “Common-wealth by Acquisition”, or by by agreement, which he calls a “Common-wealth by Institution”.

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

However it is to be underlined that Hobbes’ Commonwealth is centered on fear. Men joined the civil society to live in peace outside of the state of war that is the state of nature. But the only reason maintaining peace in the civil society according to Hobbes is the fear of repercussions. The sovereign is made strong to counter the natural « bad » nature of men. He is given «  the power to keep them in awe and bind them by the fear of punishment and respect the laws of nature ».

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Natural condition of man according to Aristotle and Hobbes Hobbes and Aristotle are known as influential political philosophers in the world. Both of them have profound and significant doctrines; however, their thoughts about natural condition of man are quite various. According to Hobbes, by nature humans are equal in the faculties of body and mind. He claims that even the weakest man has strength to kill the strongest man because nature gives the same rights to everyone. Among men there is not any inequality that gives exclusive opportunity to a person by nature.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Firstly, an absolute monarchy as proposed by Hobbes would require that people relinquish their own rights and to submit to one absolute power, which Locke feels is counterintuitive his understand of humans in the state of nature. A distinctive feature of Locke’s state of nature is perfect freedom for people to carry out their own wills without hindrance. Hence, Locke’s main critique of Hobbes’ absolutism is that people living under a Hobbesian

Read More
1688 Words | 7 Pages

Thomas Hobbes in his book “Leviathan” argues that an absolute monarchy is the best form of government. He provided several reasonings in defending his views; laws obeyed, the interest of the people achieved, consistent laws and social utility maximized. In this paper, I will look at the advantages and disadvantages of having a monarchy, and I will support his argument that monarchy is necessary for society and why it is the best form of government. In a monarchy, the sovereign can be self-motivated, and Hobbes agrees that the self-interest motivates a monarch just like everyone else leading to corruption and unfair distribution of wealth in a society.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

It is important to understand and agree to the system of authority. Without it, the State may be in a system of indiscipline, crime and chaos. The approach of general will and state of nature focused by the two philosophers is the essence of the utilitarian approach. The idea of general will is based on freedom, according to Hobbes; the state of nature was of war and man was constantly fighting. Human life according to Hobbes was, “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.”

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Thomas Hobbes, known for opining that the life of man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” presents a pessimistic view of man in the state of nature, explaining that a constant state of war exists where “the notions of right and wrong…have there no place” (Prompt 1). He reasons that because man is at odds with everyone in this state of nature and does not even own himself, there is no propriety whatsoever, negating the existence of property rights (Hobbes 393-394). Hobbes then invokes his laws of nature to explain that man’s desire for peace will lead him to enter into a contract with his peers where the transfer of rights to an all powerful sovereign occurs. The sovereign has complete control over all affairs of those entered into the social contract and his subjects are not allowed to dissolve the sovereign due to the fact that they created it (Lecture 9/24). One of the rights transferred to the sovereign is “the whole power of prescribing the rules, whereby every man may know, what good he may enjoy, and what actions he may do.”

Read More

More about Liberalism In America's Leviathan By Thomas Hobbes

Related Topics

Open Document