ipl-logo

Liebeck V Mcdonald's Restaurants Case Summary

655 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Mcdonalds corporation case study

Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants McDonald's has been involved in a number of lawsuits and other legal cases in the course of the fast food chain's 70-year history. Although one of the most known ones is the “Hot Coffee Lawsuit”. The individuals involved with the case include 79-year-old Stella Liebeck, and McDonald’s. Stella Liebeck of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was in the passenger seat of her grandson's car when she was severely burned by McDonalds' coffee in February 1992. The trial took place from August 8–17, 1994, before New Mexico District Court Judge Robert H. Scott. During the case, her attorney argued that the temperature of the coffee should never be hotter than 140 degrees. The attorney discovered that the coffee served to Liebeck was to be served at 180-190 degrees. Although coffee between those temperatures could easily burn someone pretty quickly. Liebeck’s lawyers presented the jury with evidence, showing that as you lower the temperature you can increase the time it will take for a burn to take place. McDonald's argued that the reason for serving such hot coffee was that those who …show more content…

Because everyone knows when you order coffee, that its going to be hot. Unless you order ice coffee of course. Although now that I`ve looked more into it and heard the arguments from both sides. I believe that both parties are responsible. Although I believe it should’ve of been 60% McDonald’s and 40% Liebeck. For one the argument talking about the temperature being too hot to begin with. Is something I would have never thought of bringing to the table. As well as the caution hot warning being larger. I think Liebeck is 40% in the wrong because, she should’ve known the coffee was hot, and should’ve been more careful. In the end I wouldn’t of paid Liebeck as much as she got, but I agree that she should get some kind of compensatory damage pay, and punitive damage

Show More
Related
184 Words | 1 Pages

Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Case Analysis Paper / Discussion MBA 623 Name: Patel Mukeshkumar Shamalbhai Paper # Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 (3d Cir. 2006) Word Count: _______ I. Citation: Turner v. Hershey Chocolate USA, 440 F.3d 604 [3d Cir. 2006] II. Issue and Rule: The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s disability claim.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

Though it was initially dismissed, it was reversed by the Utah Court of Appeals. At trial, an arson expert defended Landry by testifying that the fire should have never been classified as an arson because the evidence was invalid and unreliable. Landry was then granted a new trial where his attorney explained how the evidence should not have been accepted as admissible proof of arson without legitimate laboratory

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

The trial judge tried to be seen as being impartial by allowing Celia to access the best defense attorneys available and allowing the case to be determined by a jury. The defense comprised of three defense attorneys who were never known to hold any strong opinion on the matter of slavery though they were very good in research. In the defense of the case the attorneys wanted to prove the motive of the murder rather than try to claim innocence in the case. They knew Celia stood a chance to be acquitted or get a lenient sentence if they played to the sympathy of the jurist and the judge over her sexual harassment under her

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Jan acknowledges his situation, “The whole idea of lawsuits is to settle, to compel the other side to settle” [1]. In fact, he uses this reasoning to his advantage by demanding a total of 320 million dollars from both companies. The case is drawn out and both businesses stubbornly refuse to take responsibility, Cheeseman arguing that, “These chemicals never reached Wells G and H - we will show that. And they never made anyone sick. We will show that, too” [1] while Fascher, representing Beatrice Foods, explaining that, “Unless you've proven that poisons reached the wells, there's no case” [1].

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

The Supreme Court Case One, Inc. v. Olesen of 1958 was one of the first ever court cases to explicitly be about the topic of homosexuality. The court case centered around the homophile magazine entitled One, which was written and organized by members of the Mattachine Society to bring (gay) people together and talk about political issues in the LGBTQ community. When copies of the magazine were sent to their prospective readers, the postmaster of Los Angeles seized the copies because they were considered obscene. Obviously, the staff at One were irate, because it was a clear violation of their right to free speech. Also, people had paid for the magazine and were expecting to receive it, so why did the post office not deliver it?

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

(Cheeseman2013) In the case Wal-Mart stores vs. Dukes’ female employees claimed and filed a class action law suit against the super-giant retail chain. The claiming was discrimination against female employees and denied individual’s employee’s advancement. They said they were paid less than their male counterpart with- in the company for doing the same amount of work. Although Wal-Mart had a policy against discrimination, most employee assessments were made at the local manager level.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

Gentlemen of the jury, thank you for listening so intently to this trial. I know you care nsider that the weather at this time was -42 degrees, which means that Slade might not have even drank the wood alcohol. He might have froze to death or suffered hypothermia. This again proves that Mr. Baumer is very innocent. Prosecutors and witness against Mr. Baumer say that Mr. Baumer is the reason that Slade is not standing here today.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Essential English Assignment 1 text: In the documentary “Super Size Me” the film maker Morgan Spurlock is portrayed as the protagonist fighting against the antagonist which is the worldwide corporation of McDonalds. Spurlock places him self in the documentary as a hero who fights for the victims in this case two teenagers who developed health problems and decided to sue McDonald’s but the Judge in that case stated “if the plaintiffs can allege that McDonald’s products intended us is to be eaten for every meal of every day, and that McDonald’s is or should be aware that eating McDonald’s products for every meal every day is unreasonably dangerous, they may be able to state a claim” (YouTube, 2018). Spurlock proves this by starting a 30 day

Read More
837 Words | 4 Pages

The court precluded the defendant from liability because the wire she tripped on was open and obvious. They held that the open and obvious doctrine applies when a defendant failed to warn about a dangerous condition and also when the defendant breached the duty in allowing the condition to exist. Id. at 495, 595 N.W. 2d at

Read More
389 Words | 2 Pages

It was a very hot summer day. I remember one of the jurors talking about how it was a record breaking day. I was tired and a bit tense. I hated doing things in the heat. I mean, who would ever want to work in the heat, especially when a person’s life is at stake?

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Political • Growing demand and supply shortage has increased world coffee prices. • Favorable advantage to accessing raw material through supplier relationships. • Fair-trade practices include its Coffee and Farmers Equity (C.A.F.E.) program among other fair trade policies and agreements. • Starbucks adheres to local, national and international government laws and policies and tightly control labour practices, avoiding scrutiny and negative imagery from being a large corporation. Economic • High industry sensitivity to the macroeconomic factors affecting disposable income, a main industry driver.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

The first two cafes drinks were more caloric, double the price and took longer than the third café. Given that, Freedman thanks McDonalds. Eminent voices in the food culture convince people that McDonalds is unhealthy. Most processed foods are considered unhealthy because of the artificial flavoring, and preservatives. That being the case, whole-some foods are considered healthy because it doesn’t sit on the shelf for a month.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

These actions are not the right thing to be done from a business viewpoint. Therefore, Starbucks is seemed as extremely unethical and

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

McDonald’s is the world’s largest restaurant chain, serving a total of 69 million people a day at 34,000 restaurants worldwide. While facing a tough competition, McDonald’s has chosen to launch a new product to sustain competitive advantage as well as to attract customers in the ’18 to 32 years old’ range, which they have struggled with up to today. They launched the McWrap on April 1, invented by the 47 years old vice president and executive chef Dan Coudreaut. The McWrap is meant to be a healthier choice than the products McDonald’s are in general known for, as well as to compete with competitors such as Five Guys, Subway and Chipotle. However, people assimilate McDonald’s to junk food unlike the ”Subway buster”.

Read More

More about Liebeck V Mcdonald's Restaurants Case Summary

Open Document