On July 29, 2003 Detective Jason Leavitt was a part of a decoy operation with an undercover arrest team ; he was dressed on black jeans, a dirty short- sleeved flannel shirt on top of a dirty-t shirt, and a baseball cap to apart as a drunk homeless man . Detective Leavitt carried Twenty one-dollar bills in his breast pocket, to attract a thief. Leavitt was on the block of 200 Main St across from the Greyhound station. The Appellant Richard Miller approached Detective Leavitt on this very street to ask him for money. Detective Leavitt told Miller he was not going to give him an money, Leavitt testified that the appellant put his arm around him and asked him to go get a drink.
Thank you for retaining The Law Offices of Pegah Lak & Associates for you legal matters. . I have conducted some legal research to better prepare to fight this matter on your behalf. Based on my research and opinion, we have a good chance in dismissing the allegations against your airline. Below you will find the defenses that we can possibly assert by a motion.
I’ve got some feedback on Barron’s draft: 36-521.02.B – This subsection says we can hold the patient while the screening agency (SA) reviews the application, which is good. However, we want to hold the patient while we make the application to the SA, too. We’d be fine with a timeframe for the hospital to make the application. 36-521.02.D – We have two comments here. 1) As drafted, the subsection says that if a Certificate of Hold is issued by the SA then a hospital can hold a patient for 9 hours, once medically cleared, while waiting for transport to the SA.
This consolidated appeal arises out of a declaratory judgment action, a foreclosure action, and a motion for possession of property initiated in the Circuit Court for Howard County. Mortgagor Sirina Sucklal (“Sucklal”), appellant, challenges the grant of summary judgment to the substitute trustees Mark H. Wittstadt, and Gerard Wm. Wittstadt, Jr. (collectively, “Substitute Trustees”), the ratification of the foreclosure sale, and the subsequent grant of a motion for judgment awarding possession to the purchasers at the foreclosure sale. On appeal, Sucklal presents six questions for our review, which we have condensed and rephrased as follows: 1.
CCIB received an Incident Report from the LTCO Maged Mansour (213) 351-6433 regarding resident Maria Alcantara. The SOC 341 states that Maria disclosed to facility staff and her Day Program staff that residential facility staff member Gloria G hit her in her back. Once notified by of incident the facility staff notified the administrator Kendal Woods (323) 208-0133. According to the RP the incident is under investigation. The suspected abuser would be suspended pending
Procedural History • The State of Minnesota convicted Kelbel in violation of first-degree murder, past pattern of child abuse, and second-degree murder. • The Supreme Court of Minnesota sentenced Kelbel to life in prison. • Kelbel first appealed that the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed the violations. • Secondly, Kelbel appealed that the evidence presented was insufficient.
Per Reporter: Christine and the baby tested positive for benzodiazepines and marijuana. The meconium test is pending. There were no birth defects; however, the nurse (unknown) mentioned that the baby is experiencing withdrawals (trimmers). Christine takes Subutex (methadone), which are prescribed.
Yes, I believe Ms. Fortin was a victim of union animus because her employer were not big supporter of unions. Few months prior to her dismissal, Ms. Fortin appeared on a union flyer; consequently, the relationship between Ms. Fortin and her employer were not the same. In addition, Ms. Fortin attended a hearing concerning unions representing her workplace. When she returned to work that day, her boss called her into the office and gave her a disciplinary warning. Furthermore, two days later Ms. Fortin received four additional disciplinary actions.
Summary of Source The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities.
In this case Kyllo v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled against the vitric of the lower courts on a 5 to 4 vote. The questions that need to be answered in this case, in my opinion serve a bigger purpose then the case at hand. The case itself is about a man named Danny Kyllo who was growing marijuana plants inside his home illegally. An officer of the U.S Interior Department got a tip that this man was illegally growing plants inside his home and went to investigate this. Obviously a tip from an unknown is not enough information to get a warrant to search the man’s property.
1. Choose Life Ill., Inc. v. White, 547 F.3d 853 (7th Cir. 2008). a. Facts: 25,000 signatures were collected from residents interested in purchasing a “Choose Life” specialty plate. The proposal for this plate was denied. CLI argued that failure to allow these specialty plates constituted viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment.
Goal: Donterius will extensively decrease the frequency and intensity of temper tantrums and convey anger through suitable statements and healthy physical outlets four times a day for three weeks. Intervention: MHP assisted Donterius in recognizing successful strategies that have been used on days when he controls his temper and does not hit siblings, peers, or others. MHP coached in meditation and self-control strategies to help Donterius convey his anger through suitable statements and healthy physical outlets. MHP recommended that Donterius expresses his anger in a positive manner.
To a significant extent, Sulla, Pompey and Cicero were individuals who allowed situations to occur which led to the fall of the republic. The fall of the Roman republic was more than a single man. It was a culmination of several individual actions, coupled with social conditions that were weighted heavily on Roman society. Though powerful individuals contributed to the fall of the republic, it was not successful in preventing the fall of the republic however, it has significantly maintained control of Rome for an adequate period of time. This is most apparent through Sulla substantial amount of power to increase the power of the senate and gave rise to individuals, also through Pompey’s formation of the first triumvirate with Crassus and Cicero.
The case assessment of Brianna Lopez begins with her birth on February 14, 2002 in a New Mexico hospital. After leaving the hospital, Brianna resided in Las Cruces, New Mexico with her unwed parents, Andrew “Andy” Walters, 21, and Stephanie Lopez, 19. There were also four other adults and one child, Andy and Stephanie’s 18 month old son, living in the home (State v. Walters, 2007). Among these adults was Brianna’s uncle, Steven Lopez. Shortly after her arrival home, Baby Brianna experienced extreme physical, verbal, and sexual abuse from her parents and uncle.
The Cold War was the conflict between the United States-Western European Countries and USSR-Eastern European countries. This conflict was mostly based on the different ideology of the 2 main powers of the world. US didn’t want Stalin and his oppressive dictatorship to take over the rest of the Europe and specifically Germany, while Stalin was paranoid about US trying to assert its influence on the countries that were in the USSR sphere of influence. The containment plan was the plan devised by United States to stop the spread of communism and their ideology throughout the world. This containment plan however was one of the main reasons for the start of the Cold War.
