Why the drinking age is set the way that it is? The national drinking age act of 1984 stated that among 18-20 year old in areas where the drinking age had been lowered have more opportunities of having an accident. Some collage contend that by lowering that drinking age college would be able to bring booze out into the campus and educate students on responsible consumption. For a while Louisiana was a safety place for thirsty teens to drink until the state passed a law that made illegal to buy alcohol if you were under 21. Mothers and many other began to protest for a uniform national drinking age of 21 to help eliminate and keep alcohol out of the hands of less immature 18 years old. I would thinking that the problem wouldn’t be really if you should drink at 18 because you could be immature. Any person can be immature at any age. So therefore I am in favor by lowering the drinking age to 18. I am in favor of lowering the drinking age to 18 because many people say that at the age of 18 you are immature. Immaturity can be at any age, I would say that it all depends in the way children are raised at home and grow up to be responsible to know what life has to bring. Many young people grown up with their family drinking and learn from them in how to be responsible when they drink. I would say …show more content…
Many factors has contributed to this question. Over the past two decades factors like having safer vehicles, more stricter seat belt laws, designated drivers, sobriety checkpoints, etc. all these factors have helped in the reduction of fatalities in the past two decades. Seat belts laws and airbags have been even more effective than the 21 year old age. Thanks to these factors they have reduced the fatalities and the people will now be safer. This will not completely eliminate the deaths but it will be improved in the future and hopefully be reduced even