Macbeth And Lord Of The Flies Analysis

489 Words2 Pages

It is clearly suggested that there is always a desire to be a leader, be a king, minister or any ruler and the label is not important. Controlling or ruling other people seems fascinating. People in a society are divided into groups according to the power they have in different ways. William Golding’s Lord of the flies and william shakespeare’s macbeth are both moral stories. In this essay I am trying to prove that Characters in each are innocent at first but because they had desires, wanted more power, and didn't want to degrade themselves they start doing wrong behaviours. At the beginning of the play, Macbeth is an innocent character who is loyal to the king and one of the leader of the king's army. But he always wanted to be king of scotland. Jack was …show more content…

Macbeth and Jack were leader of some kind. When Macbeth is faced with three witches that prophesy his reign. His innocence is damaged, he kills the king. When Jack is on the island and it comes to choosing leader he puts himself forward. But he doesn't get chosen. Just as Macbeth kills King Duncan following his ambition, so Jack says that they do not need Ralph anymore and forms his own army, and both of them get rid of the biggest obstacle between them and their wishes. Jack takes the place of Ralph by turning everyone against him and becomes a leader; on the other hand, Macbeth becomes the king after the murder of King Duncan Also, the fear of losing power and degrading themselves makes the characters commit more crimes because of losing control. Macbeth decides to murder Macduff relying on what he has heard of the witches: “Beware Macduff. Beware the thane of Fife.” (57) Realizing that Macduff flees to England, he still wants to be sure that he will not take the throne in future. Fourthly, they both became more cruel as they gained more power. After Jack formed his own group and set up a camp on Castle Rock, he became more cruel than