Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, a time when Italy as a whole had yet to be formed; the Italian subcontinent consisted only of loosely connected groups of independent city states with a constantly evolving political battleground. Thus Machiavelli wrote The Prince to convey his idea of a strong, active, and in his own eyes, perfect ruler to the current ruling family, the Medici, as he wished to impress them and become an eventual political attaché for the family. Machiavelli argues that when given a choice it is better to be feared than loved, and bases the majority of his rhetorical argument on logical cause and effect conclusions that are exemplified through his use of anecdotes, and analogy. The excerpt begins at chapter fifteen with Machiavelli stating that he writes the prince in order to “make something useful for whoever understands it” (Machiavelli ch.15), and he expounds upon this simple purpose by devising clear and logical solutions to many of the problems that a ruler may face. His argument appears to disregard most moral and religious standards of the time, which could be attributed to the fact that he is a clear believer in the concept of politique (placing the good of the state above all else). Furthermore, …show more content…
Machiavelli begins by crafting an analogy, which serves to expound on his sentiment that a ruler must know how to govern both beast and man, and in governing beast a ruler must know when “to choose the fox and the lion” (Machiavelli ch.18). Machiavelli details how it is necessary for a ruler to have traits of both the lion and the fox, as the fox “knows how to recognize traps, and the lion [knows how] to aw the wolves” (Machiavelli ch.18). The analogy compounds on the necessity of a well-rounded ruler and serves to exemplify the core philosophy that Machiavelli is suggesting – that it is necessary for a ruler to know how best to deal with a situation at