ipl-logo

Macroeconomics During The Great Depression

509 Words3 Pages

During the Great Depression in the 1930s, many who believed in capitalism considered the system would not survive the severe economic downfall, which includes the political system of private ownership, free markets, and democratic institutions. In turn, many started advocating for socialism, a political system based on state ownership of capital and central economic planning. The socialist system contradicts the beliefs of classical macroeconomics which regarded government intervention as a hinder in market efficiency.

2. Monetarist macroeconomics is similar to the classical approach, it theorizes that aggregate fluctuations are a natural consequence of an expanding economy. However, in addition, it views the fluctuations in the quantity of money as a generator for the business cycle. It theorizes that the money available for spending and investments are important factors which can cause economic recessions and depressions.

3. …show more content…

Today’s consensus has evolved to accept sections from the three main schools of thought. “Classical macroeconomics provides the story of the economy at or close to full employment. Keynesian macroeconomics takes up the story in a recession or depression. Monetarist macroeconomics elaborates the Keynesian story by emphasizing that a contraction in the quantity of money brings higher interest rates and borrowing costs, which are a major source of cuts in spending that bring recession.” Also, it places an importance on the long-term issues for economic growth instead of the short-term issues of recessions. The theory believes that costs of recessions are severe but are concentrated to unemployed individuals. This theory examines real facts that determine real GDP at full employment. The pace of economic growth, the funds and forces that cause inflation. Lastly, it reviews the ongoing debate about government macroeconomic

More about Macroeconomics During The Great Depression

Open Document