ipl-logo

Maginot Line Essay

1806 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: French Defense Strategy prior to 1st World War

During the Battle of France in 1940, it was apparent that France’s military strategy was extremely inadequate for the modern style warfare Germany conducted throughout Europe. French leaders made several military strategy planning miscalculations leading up to World War II. First, France gambled on a more conservative defensive based military strategy approach founded upon known and familiar war tactics previously employed during the First World War. In addition, the French government made a significant economic investment in the design and construction of the Maginot Line to support their military defensive based strategy, when the planning and funding could have been better allocated to a more applicable military strategy and doctrine for …show more content…

The Maginot Line was strongly fortified and well-constructed compared to the poor construction and shortcomings of the trench warfare France previously utilized during the First World War. One significant flaw in France’s defensive based military strategy was to completely secure its border and prevent obvious gaps or weak points enemies could exploit. France simply failed to do this and intentionally limited the construction of the Maginot Line, which exposed an avenue of approach through the Ardennes. Another strategy flaw was France’s failure to use the Maginot Line position to launch a counter offensive(s), which as Clausewitz states, “is the greatest moment for the defense”. This goes back to a basic understanding that an enemy army cannot be defeated solely with a defensive based military strategy. After Germany invaded Poland, France’s leadership should have easily recognized the invasion of France was inevitable. “Even when the Germans invaded Belgium, the French General Staff continued with their cautious policy and were slow to respond to the German threat.” At this key point, France should have quickly taken the offensive, but this was not part of France’s defensive based military strategy. “The goal of France’s strategy was the avoidance of defeat, rather than the immediate gaining of

Show More
Related
1257 Words | 6 Pages

he Battle of Hamel was an exceedingly prosperous assault on the Western Front fought by the Allies, on the 4th of July 1918. The purpose of the Battle of Hamel was to attack and capture the high ground of the village of Le Hamel in France (shown in the source E), under the command of Lieutenant General John Monash. The meticulous plan conveyed by General John Monash made this battle an intensely effective advance. The Battle of Hamel is documented to have persisted for only 93 minutes and is deliberated as the turning point for Allied triumph in World War 1. It is imperative to incorporate the views and perspectives of the offensive, it is said that before the Battle of Hamel the German offensive formed a prominence in the British line that

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

The Battle of the Bulge was brutal and relentless for Germany and the Allied forces. “We are surrounded. That simplifies the problem of getting at these people and killing them,” stated Lewis B. Chesty Puller (www.military-quotes.com). This quote displays the eagerness of the Americans wanting to destroy all of the German forces surrounding Bastogne. This quote also shows humor from the complete logic of the problem getting simplified.

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

Major General Sir Arthur William Currie believed preparation was the key to ultimate success: “Thorough preparation must lead to success. Neglect nothing.” (Brewster 16) An analysis of Currie’s reliance on preparation, his tactical modus operandi, and his strategic approach reveals that Arthur Currie elevated strategic and tactical thinking to the realm of high art while commanding Canadian Forces during World War 1. By doing so, he manifested all of the qualities of precise planning.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

They felt vulnerable to everyone. France is right next to Germany, and refuse to let them have any military forces at the border. (Doc A) Germany is even more defenseless and they have to obey by what France tells them. Since

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The directive not only increased the priority for personnel and materiel resources in favor of units in France and the Low Countries, but it also directed Field Marshal Erwin Rommel to ‘invigorate’ anti-invasion efforts in France.

Read More
1814 Words | 8 Pages

The allies failed to achieve their objectives because the strategy was full of flaws, poor planning and coordination of required

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Antoine Jomini’s theory of interior lines has been disproven by advances in the technology of moving armies, changes in economic-military relationships and through its use in several wars. Though popular during the 19th and 20th centuries the changing character of warfare and globalization in the 21st century has negated the possession of interior lines as a viable military strategy. The Industrial Revolution created the railroad, internal combustion engine and the airplane. These new implements of war allowed greater maneuverability on the battlefield and shortened the time required to mobilize a fighting force. Revolutions in employment of these new machines would put the advantages of interior lines at risk.

Read More
1260 Words | 6 Pages

The second manifestation of the German blitzkrieg (lightning war) began with the Nazi invasion of France on May 10, 1940. In the following six weeks, due to the gross misjudgment of the German objective, the European power and worldwide empire of France seemed to be extinguished after the occupation of Paris on June 14. Now without significant opposition, the majority of Europe would be subject to Nazi dominion and the Aryan racial hierarchy. The previously indestructible morale of the French people appeared to be annihilated, and the fate of their country in the hands of an unquenchable man. However, on June 18th ears turned to the British Isles at the sound of a familiar French voice, war-hero and brigadier general Charles de Gaulle, and

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

When informing the U.S. Secretary of State of its decision to resume unrestricted submarine warfare, German Ambassador Count Johann von Bernstorff said, “The Imperial Government could not justify before its own conscience, before the German people, and before history the neglect of any means destined to bring about the end of the war.” This shows the pressure the Government felt and why the government was forced to do whatever it took to emerge victorious. The German government knew that if they resumed unrestricted submarine warfare, the United States would enter the war, but they didn’t have any other choice. In addition, Germany underestimated the U.S., assuming that its troops would be ineffective and slow to mobilize. They thought that in the amount of time it took for sizable amounts of American troops to reach the Western front, Germany would have had enough time to suffocate Great Britain and end the war.

Read More
217 Words | 1 Pages

For this assignment, I have read the “Appeal of June 18” by Charles de Gaulle. This is one the speech made by the French General Charles de Gaulle when he was in exile in London, Great Britain during the World War II. The speech was given on radio london and he was addressed to the French soldiers, engineers and “special workers of armament industries” to contact him. In the speech, General de Gaulle recognized France has lost the battle but not the war. Because, as he said “this war is not finished by the battle of France”, “France is not alone, she has a vast Empire behind her”, and “use without limit the immense industry of United States”.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

The Schlieffen Plan failed because the Germans took too long in the battle with France. Also, They kept destroying the railroads, so the railroads had to be rebuilt. Then, they underestimated France and how fast Russia can mobilize their army. This actually weakened Germany because they were not prepared for Russia to attack them so quickly, so they did not have enough troops fighting the Russians. Did it change the war?

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Germans kept pushing to capture France, leaving

Read More
240 Words | 1 Pages

The Belgians prevented the Germans from taking the French ports by flooding their land. France responded to the German attack by launching an invasion of Alsace and Lorraine, but this did not work. They then made troops go to the front line. The german’s were then pushed back 40 miles. After this, the French and British went to secure the ports.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

The Germans were going to use their new advancement in technology as a way of transportation, the railways. The original plan was to travel through Luxembourg and Belgium to get to France. This was a risky operation because Belgium had neutrality that was guaranteed by Great Britain. The strategy depended on Britain not supporting Belgium in this case. Once secured on the Franco-Germany border, Germany

Read More
1181 Words | 5 Pages

After the German’s success at the Battle of Mons they pushed on to Paris, but General von Moltke changed his mind at last minute (perhaps for fear of leaving behind the unreliable supply chain); instead of attacking Paris from the West as previously planned, the army would only attack from the North, so as to travel fewer miles. This was the beginning of the downfall of the Schlieffen plan that might have otherwise worked, and therefore a step towards the war not being over by Christmas. The Battle of the Marne on the 6th September occurred when the French alongside the BEF furiously defended their capital city and pushed the Germans back to the river Aisne- the Schlieffen plan was foiled and Paris would not be captured within 40

Read More

More about Maginot Line Essay

Related Topics

Open Document