ipl-logo

Major War Criminal Trials

1124 Words5 Pages

The Major War Criminal Trials served justice to those who held major roles in maintaining Nazi agenda. The trials took place in Nuremberg, Germany. Unlike traditional courts, the Nuremberg trials had a tribunal or a council of judges oversee the trial. The four major superpowers- France, The United States, Russia, and Great Britain- had one judge in the tribunal. Moreover, as all four countries had different legislative, the tribunal decided that the defendants could hire their own lawyer and determining sentences would be a joint task. The Major War Criminal Trials began on November 20, 1945 and concluded on October 1, 1946. “Some 5,000 Nazi’s were charged with war crimes. However, the Nuremberg trials were designed specifically to prosecute …show more content…

The following charges are not to be taken lightly as the actions of these figures lead to the subsequent death of millions. Clearly, justice had to be served to these criminals as ignoring their actions would be similar to neglecting that these millions did not die. In addition, after the mass casualties that ensued in World War II, justice could only be morally achieved in a court of law rather than senseless killing. The severity of their sentences weighed on how many charges they were guilty of. After the span of 9 months and 216 trials, a consensus was reached. The verdicts included 12 sentenced to death by hanging, 3 sentenced to life in prison, 4 receiving prison sentences ranging from 10-20 years, and 3 being acquitted(History.com “Nuremberg Trials”). However, the dictating figure behind WWII was not present. Adolf Hitler committed suicide prior to being caught and charged in court(History.com Nuremberg trials). Unfortunately, the atrocities that have been committed by these individuals cannot be reversed, but by …show more content…

These trials dealt with judges who enforced eugenics laws, doctors who commited inhumane experiments on war prisoners, and SS officers who were violent against concentration camp inmates among other atrocities(Ushmm, “Subsequent Nuremberg Proceeding”). In addition, these 12 trials differed to the War Criminal Trials because rather than the trials being judged by an international council of judges, the trials were reviewed by a U.S military tribunal. One hundred eighty-three defendants were indicted and 12 trials took place. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum states that ¨The 12 subsequent trials were: Case #1, The Medical Case; Case #2, The Milch Case; Case #3, The Justice Case; Case #4, The Pohl Case; Case #5, The Flick Case; Case #6, The I.G. Farben Case; Case #7, The Hostage Case; Case #8, The RuSHA Case; Case #9, The Einsatzgruppen Case; Case #10, The Krupp Case; Case #11, The Ministries Case; Case #12, The High Command Case.¨(Ushmm, ¨Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings¨). In order to serve complete justice, all who contributed to German crime had to face retribution. Moreover, the crimes committed by these people were quite inhumane as in some cases, industrialists were charged for slave labor and doctors were charged for performing inhumane experiments on prisoners. The number of defendants in the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials were far greater than the Major War Criminal Trial. “In total the

Show More
Related
579 Words | 3 Pages

On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

The Nazi atrocities of World War II are well documented – rightly so given the horrors they perpetuated and the scale at which they managed to commit their crimes.   However, the level of the Nazi crimes often overshadow other atrocities that occurred throughout the war, such as those of Japanese Unit 731, but that wasn’t the only thing keeping Unit 731 out of the mainstream. Unit 731 was set up in 1938 in Japanese-occupied China with the aim of developing biological weapons.

Read More
1214 Words | 5 Pages

The trial covered the three main factors of denying the Holocaust. The biggest accusations claim was that there was no proof of the Nazi’s having an organized plan to eliminate Jews, that there was no proof that Hitler ordered the extermination or did not know of the extermination of Jews, and that no Jews were killed with the use of gas chambers. He believed specifically that no Jew was ever murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz extermination camp. The trial began in January of 2000 and ended, with a judgment strongly in favor of Lipstadt and her publisher, in April of that year. The purpose of the trial was for Irving to gain his credibility back.

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

1. “They were forced to dig huge trenches. When they had finished their work, the men from the Gestapo began theirs. Without passion or haste, they shot their prisoners, who were forced to approach the trench one by one and offer their necks. Infants were tossed into the air and used as targets for the machine guns.”

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

The destinies of several nazi individuals all throughout the last of World War II are spread wherever the guide regarding what transpired. Many took a sign from their devoted pioneer, Adolf Hitler, and submitted suicide to evade catch and discipline. These war hoodlums could never need to confront their violations. Others fled the nation and went up against expected characters in an attempt to escape experts. While a large portion of the individuals who fled were caught, there is entirely a main 10 most needed rundown of Holocaust war lawbreakers today.

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

Lastly, the Nuremberg trials was one of the biggest events to occur toward Albert Speer. It is because of his work with the Nazi Party and his contribution to the outcome of war, was he being held accountable for his actions. However, through devious remarks and claims that he was unaware of such actions being taken place under his authority, he was sentenced to a lighter penalty than what his fellow collages. Speer was held accountable for four crimes; including the common plan or conspiracy to accomplish… a war aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity. However, out of the four crimes, ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’ were the two that would have been the biggest concern for Speer.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

The most infamous of these camps was Auschwitz, which was responsible for the deaths of over one million people. The Holocaust ended in 1945 with the defeat of Nazi Germany by the Allies. The scale of the atrocity shocked the world, and efforts were made to bring the perpetrators to justice. The Nuremberg Trials were held in 1945-1946, where Nazi leaders were prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against

Read More
846 Words | 4 Pages

The Blame Game When a person is murdered, or hurt an investigation happens. This usually leads to a murderer, and accomplice. This murderer goes on trial and is either found guilty or not guilty. During the time period of January 30, 1933 to May 8, 1945 a mass murder happened of about 11 million people in Germany.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Many of the accused got sentenced to life in prison or death. Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to explain the correlation of the environmental aspects that make people do terrible things and how far people will go to harm others. Social pressures also play a big role in how people think. Minorities can have their ideas of what is right and what is wrong swept over by majorities which was displayed in Solomon Asch’s experiments. The most important thing to learn from the Nuremburg trials, Milgram’s experiment, and Asch’s experiment is that sometimes it is better to resist authority if it means following moral

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Although millions were murdered during the Holocaust, many war criminals were brought to trial and convicted for their crimes (Nuremburg Trials). The Nuremberg trials were a series of thirteen trials carried in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

The Impact of the Nuremberg Trials Noah Matt Albia High School English 10 Mrs. Lawson 29 March 2023 Title The Holocaust was one of the most decisive times in human history, but oftentimes its aftermath is severely overshadowed. The Nuremberg trials permanently altered the course of global history, and international law.

Read More
147 Words | 1 Pages

In conclusion, throughout all the suffering that went on during the Holocaust, justice needs to be served, all the cruel acts of the guards, and a good universal message are the reasons to why Nazi war criminals should be prosecuted. It will be beneficial to the victims who had died or escaped after all the torture and things

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

Some of these Germans were charged with conspiracy, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity. In these trials they were able to prove with photographs and film footage of German soldiers having operations against Jewish people. There was also public records of the horrific crimes against the Jewish people .Also towards the end of the trials they were able to recover the plans for Auschwitz(Concentration

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

During a time in history, many people have suffered because of hatred and genocide. An example of this is when the African Americans were forced into slavery and killed when they did not work. The events in these acts were because of the silent majority . People were too afraid to speak their minds and stand up for themselves . This event was similar to slavery with the Native Americans when they were held against their will when the white  men was taking over.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

During the Holocaust millions of people were killed by the Nazis because they were not the ideal race. The Nuremberg Trials were held in Nuremberg, Germany. The judges of the trials were from Great Britain, the Soviet Union, the United States, and France. These trials were held to bring justice to all the lives lost during World War two. After the Holocaust, the Nuremberg Trials were held to bring justice to Nazi officials, Industrialists, but failed to punish those who escaped.

Read More

More about Major War Criminal Trials

Related Topics

Open Document