ipl-logo

Majoritarian Vs Consensus Mode

1171 Words5 Pages

Canada is composed of many different regions, all following the democratic political system. There are two competing types of democracy; the majoritarian and consensus mode. Majoritarian mode concentrates its political power to the hands of the majority, while the consensus mode is a negotiation democracy that ensures all group members are included, including minority groups. The consensus mode aims to maximize the size of the ruling majority rather than being satisfied with the bare majority. This incorporates shared power around citizens. Issues are always rising over many controversial topics. In Canada we follow the majoritarian system to help deal with and settle disagreements. A decision is made by majority rules. This means, votes are …show more content…

However, Switzerland uses the consensus model. The Swiss political system is run by a federal council and legislatures that are elected individually for four years (Lijphart 2014, p. 35).This allows for more independence and a balanced relationship from the separation of powers more than the cabinet-parliament we have here in Canada. (Lijphart 2014, p. 35). Consensus models are also fare better with the control of violence, voter turnout and citizens’ satisfaction with democracy (Freeland, Valerie. Poli 220-101, Democracy, October 3.) All these are very important to consider for Canada’s political system as they hold great significance. Also strong bicameralism uses the upper house to make decisions to benefit minorities by giving them special representations. Where as the majoritarian is a unicameral legislature which means only lower house is making decisions. (Lijphart 2014, p. 36). Therefore, like the Swiss, allowing Canada to incorporate a bicameralism legislature means there is more compromise between majorities and minority groups. This relates back to both countries being multicultural. Discrimination becomes an issue when this minority ethnic groups feel they have no rights. The Swiss system has the National Council as the lower house to represents the Swiss people. In Canada we could allow for the lower council then to repent all the ethnic groups and again avoid …show more content…

The consensus model will then represented the people in a society by including minority groups. Including minority groups is essential in Canada since we are recognized for being a cultural mosaic. As well as this sticks to the original meaning of democracy being by and for the people. A majoritarian model of government only made decisions in the hands of a select few, whereas, in a consensus model the power was divided in a federal or decentralized

Show More
Related

How Did Pierre Trudeau Affect Canada

755 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Canadian history, Canada had always been socially divided. Between the English speaking majority and the French speaking majority. One of Trudeau’s main objective was to erase this separation between these two parties. Firstly, in order to ease tension between the French speaking majority, Trudeau placed a “Official Language Act” in 1969 . This was the first act that English and French the

Read More

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Section 33 For Canadian

1366 Words | 6 Pages

This is better known as the ‘Notwithstanding Clause’, and has several pros and cons for Canadians. Some of the pros include that the bill ensures that the balance of power stays within the elected government instead of within the courts, the threat to individual rights is minor because of the five year limit on any use of it, and that only some, not all rights are subject to a possible legislative override. The most controversial pro is the fact that that the bill ensures that the balance of power stays within the elected government instead of within the courts. Many feel that it is very valuable that the courts play a role in the elaboration of rights and freedoms, however it not proper for them to act as legislators. In Canada, there is very little evidence that judges are ever selected based on how it is believed they would rule in certain cases, however, if the notwithstanding clause did not exist and the judges did act as legislators, it is safe to believe this would change.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Separation From Canada

136 Words | 1 Pages

For this reason Quebec wants to separate from Canada. If they are politically separated they will have the power to make their own laws on whether on not

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Xlandia

179 Words | 1 Pages

In addition, the legislature of Xlandia should be bicameral. Xlandia size is not as massive as Texas, but not as small as Delaware either, it is about the size of Ohio. Because of its size, we decided a bicameral legislature was the better option. A bicameral legislature has an upper house, which would revise, amend or improve the laws that the lower house suggests. Since they have someone that will be able to double check the suggestion before approving them, insures a more reliable government for the people (Tom Todd).

Read More

Aucoin's Democratic Reform In Canada

1010 Words | 5 Pages

Aucoin Essay Our new prime minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau has given a set of democratic reforms to minister LeBlanc who has been given the task to deal with the problems regarding parliament issues. Our prime minister has promised Canadians real change to the way the government governs by committing to invest in Canada’s growing economy, to strengthen the middle-class, to help the hard working class, to provide help to those whom need it most compared to those who do not need it, and to invest in the public to create jobs, economic growth and a broad-based expansion. Aucoin’s democratic reform proposal tests for good reforms that include clear objectives, no loopholes, clear enforcement mechanism, entrench the house of commons power, fixed

Read More

Political Absolutism In Canada

728 Words | 3 Pages

Absolutism has led to many societal changes and lack therefore of. Canada has experienced Stability and Change as a result of its government, different Canadian political parties has ideals and objects that both progress or reject society and constant change in government ensures that policies proposed by governments are wholesomely beneficial to

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The STV System

180 Words | 1 Pages

The May 17th, 2005 referendum was designed to ask the public if they would like to use the Single Transferable Vote system in British Columbia, or the Single Member Plurality system.  Both systems have pros and cons, but in the end, the referendum results showed interest in the SMP system over the STV system. The STV system has a lot of complicated steps that are hard to follow and understand for people that are not educated in politics.  It also could create tension between the different MLAs that are being elected in the same riding, especially if they have different views on how to improve and develop their riding.  It is most likely similar to the format of a coalition government and how it can involve ideas from different parties and viewpoints.

Read More

Bloc Quebecois Argument Essay

1122 Words | 5 Pages

In many countries, conflict between different groups of people is inevitable. In Canada, the divide between English-speaking and French-speaking regions has been a prominent political and cultural topic since the birth of the nation. The most well known of these conflicts goes to Quebec. The province has sprouted several movements and parties supporting the autonomy and independence of Quebec. One of those parties is the Bloc Quebecois.

Read More

Michael Ignatieff's Democracy And Rights Revolution

327 Words | 2 Pages

An ideology of revolution through an improvement of rights system was illustrated and discussed in Michael Ignatieff’s article “Democracy and Rights Revolution” (2000). He revealed that this transition, which started from 1960s, has effects both improving equality of the society and protecting one right for all people—the right to be different. Meanwhile, the author also pointed out that people who were granted the rights they asked for did not necessarily wish the same for others. As a result of rights revolution, Canada has become one of the most distinct countries, in which the rights cultures prevail, and it has a pivotal role in promoting the concept internationally as well.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

Read More

Controversial Issues In Canada

1148 Words | 5 Pages

Firstly, with knowledge I have inferred with the article from CBC news I am able to relate it to the course of issues in diversity as I understand the bill passed in Quebec has conflicted with the concept of Canada. For instance, Canada has developed as of the four ideologies. For example, the upbringing of Canada has allowed the country itself to develop as a

Read More

Canadian Charter Of Rights Essay

1459 Words | 6 Pages

elective representatives square measure restricted in what they'll do -- and also the system of checks and balances that exists consists of unelected, unaccountable Supreme Court Justices -- thus, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is anti-democratic. this can be a heavy, and untrue, statement. it's as a result of this Charter that we tend to, as Canadians, square measure entitled thereto opinion. maybe one ought to examine the method by that legislation will be turned, instead of the very fact that it's

Read More

Strengths Of Democracy In Canada

1065 Words | 5 Pages

Research Paper On Democracy in Canada Name : Harpreet Kaur Introduction The word democracy describes a Political System of any country. Dramatic changes have taken place in recent Years at the national level with respect to the day today functioning of our constitutional democracy. In a Democratic country like Canada , America all the citizens that are eligible have the rights to participate directly or indirectly in decision making that affect them.

Read More

Informative Speech On Cancer

268 Words | 2 Pages

How is the cancer is related to the related to the cell cycle checkpoints? This is how. The process is right at the heart of the cancer. Which is controlled by the a lot of complex series. With signaling pathways where the cell grows and copies DNA then divides.

Read More

Majority Rule Advantages And Disadvantages

1312 Words | 6 Pages

"Candidate with the highest number of the vote wins the right to represent the particular seat in the House of Commons", according to CBC news. There are some limitations regarding this method. First of all, it could possibly happen that candidate with less than half vote wins, which means it only reaches minority people's desired outcome. In addition to the tactical voting, the two-party system could be a serious problem. Since only the first matters, candidates with the low possibility to win may exist the election.

Read More

More about Majoritarian Vs Consensus Mode

Related Topics

Open Document