ipl-logo

Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcom X

1298 Words6 Pages

Ololade Latinwo In the 1960s, the idea of equal rights for African Americans citizens began to take hold in the United States At the head of this major movement were two major leaders: Martin Luther King Jr. Despite the fact that they had the common goal of racial equality, they had opposing views on how to obtain it. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that Civil Rights should be obtained peacefully, through methods such as boycotts, sit-ins, and marches. While Malcom X believed that such a thing should be obtained at all costs, with violence or otherwise. While many blacks found themselves divided between the two. I believe that Martin Luther King Jr.'s made the most sense. While in his prime, Martin Luther King Jr. had used a wide range …show more content…

"I don’t favor violence. If we could bring about recognition and respect of our people by peaceful means, well and good. Everybody would like to reach his objectives peacefully. But I’m also a realist. The only people in this country who are asked to be nonviolent are Black people. I’ve never heard anybody go to the Ku Klux Klan and teach them nonviolence.... Nonviolence is only preached to Black Americans, and I don’t go along with anyone who wants to teach our people nonviolence until someone at the same time is teaching our enemy to be nonviolent. I believe we should protect ourselves by any means necessary when we are attacked by racists."-Document

Show More
Related

Dr King Vs Malcom X

1382 Words | 6 Pages

He also warns that if they do not bring forth the change that the African American people, a great population of which are beginning to become sick of the way things are, have asked for that they will begin seeking alternative, violent groups. With Rev. Dr. King’s new found satisfaction of being called an extremist, he believes that it will take an extremist to fix everything that has gone on for so long. Now, whether the whites take an extremist for love or an extremist for hate and violence, like Elijah Mohammed’s Muslim movement, is up to them. These types of groups are springing up throughout America and are made up of people who have simply lost faith in the

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Dbq

1071 Words | 5 Pages

X’s theory on this makes more sense because asking someone to be nonviolent when they are being attacked is asking too much of the black American communities because there is only so much that they can let pass until they have had enough of peaceful retaliation because watching your kids get beat and watching churches getting bombed is going to trigger something in someone that says enough is enough and makes you want to fight back physically especially if nonviolence isn’t working anymore as X states in his interview in The Young Socialist on January 18,1965 “I believe we should protect ourselves by any means necessary when we are attacked by

Read More

Comparison Of Nonviolent Tactics Of MLK And Malcolm X

537 Words | 3 Pages

In document J is says,”Violence may go to the point of murdering that hater, but it doesn't murder hate. It may increase hate. It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere.” Violence leads to hate and hate has no purpose. If the African Americans’ fight the whites with violence, who are already using violence, then it would lead to endless violence.

Read More

Cesar Chavez Pathos

615 Words | 3 Pages

In 1978, the 10th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination, Cesar Chavez, a civil rights leader and leader of the National Farm Workers Association, wrote an article advocating for the acts of nonviolence. In his support for nonviolence, he made many rhetorical choices to assist his argument. He cites other leaders who found worth in nonviolence, uses pathos, personifies nonviolence, and employs an anaphora, but his overall lack of flowery language gets his argument across much clearer. Chavez opens his article by speaking of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, who this work was originally commemorating. Another civil rights leader, especially in the fight for equal rights for African Americans within the US, “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world.”

Read More

How Did Martin Luther King Jr Use Ethos Pathos Logos

1104 Words | 5 Pages

used ethos to encourage African Americans to overcome oppression,Martin Luther King Jr knew that any violence would ruin their chance at freedom, if this get violent it makes African Americans look bad and they will never receive the things they have been asking for, the most ethical thing for Martin Luther King Jr to do was to warn African Americans not to become violent, and explain to them that he knows that they have a taste for freedom, but being violent will not help them, and that exactly what he did; “ Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plain of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protests to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy, which has engulfed the Negro community, must not lead us to a distrust of all white people.”

Read More

Comparing Letter From Birmingham Jail And Notes Of A Native Son

2399 Words | 10 Pages

Even after all the injustices done to the black population of the United Sates, Dr. King is calling for them to set aside violence, bitterness, and hatred. He wants them to fight for their equality peacefully. According to Dr. King, this is the best way to stop violence. One side must step up and act peacefully in order for violence to end.

Read More

Malcolm X Vs Mlk Research Paper

552 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Malcolm X were two important Civil Rights activists who viewed segregation differently. MLK wanted violence-free protests while Malcolm X thought protesters should react “by any means necessary.” Their speeches often butted heads and changed listeners views on the topic of segregation. Each leader was impacted by their background life, Civil Rights goals, and view on lynching. Their childhoods influenced their arguments greatly.

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcolm X Pathos

590 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both leaders of the Civil Rights movement often on opposite ends of the movement. The two men approached the need for equality in the black community from differing perspectives while sharing a similar ideology. King addressed the struggles, goals, and hopes of the movement with his speech I Have a Dream. In response, Malcolm X gave his own speech The Ballot or The Bullet, within his speech he addressed a specific topic of Black Nationalism. In both speeches, we find classic uses of rhetorical tools such as ethos, pathos, and logos.

Read More

Malcolm X Dbq Analysis

563 Words | 3 Pages

MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for

Read More

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

651 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were the two most important icons during the civil right movement, in the 1960s. These two men have impacted the way Americans live today in a number ways. After slavery was made illegal in the United States, things were still difficult for black Americans. Many people were angry and displeased when slavery was ended, and lawmakers in some states, especially in the Southern States, made special rules to keep white people and black people apart.

Read More

1960s Dbq Analysis

514 Words | 3 Pages

The 1960s was a period of many uproars. Black people were fighting for their right as human beings to have the same trust and laws that any white person had. During this era, two influential figures emerged as leading voices for the African American community, those two being: Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X fought for racial equality, and their differing philosophies reflected distinct approaches to achieving their goals. During the 1960s when American ideals centered around principles of democracy and progress, Martin Luther King Jr's nonviolent resistance philosophy became widely accepted as a sensible solution for promoting social equity through integration. Martin Luther King believed in achieving racial equality through integration rather than separation.

Read More

The Difference Between Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

1974 Words | 8 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X Comparison Essay

1125 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.

Read More

The Ballot Or The Bullet Essay

1318 Words | 6 Pages

Malcolm X and his ideals are arguably a representation of the transition from the early 1950 's non-violent movement for integration to a more aggressive black power movement. Evidence of this is shown through powerful strands of his novel “The Ballot or the Bullet” including when he writes, “I don 't mean go out and get violent, but at the same time you should never be non-violent unless you run into some non-violence.” (Malcolm 439). In writing that members of the civil rights movement should never be non-violent he does so facetiously. This excerpt indicates a call for violence as a more powerful method for achieving the equality he feels they deserve.

Read More

Thesis Statement On Malcolm X

717 Words | 3 Pages

Introduction: Malcom X urges the Negro community to fight to gain the equal rights they deserve by taking action against their white oppressors. He emphasizes that blacks will gain their rights either thorough voting, with the ballot, or else through the inevitable violence with the bullet. Thesis [part a] Like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., also fighting for the civil rights of black Americans in the 1960s, but in a more peaceful manner, Malcom X takes a different approach.

Read More

More about Martin Luther King Jr Vs Malcom X

Open Document