ipl-logo

Marcus Tullius Cicero And Suetonius In Ancient Rome

467 Words2 Pages

In ancient Rome, there existed great politicians, philosophers, and thinkers who changed the history of humanity. Marcus Tullius Cicero and Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus were two men who faced problems of the old society and created a solution for the people of Rome.
In the treatise "On the Laws", Cicero shows a fictional conversation between himself, his brother Quinto, and his great friend Attic. The theme of the debate is the spirit of the Roman laws, the way in which they are approved by the assemblies, and the legitimacy of the various institutions. The main problem Cicero faced was between natural law and civil law. He wondered what law human beings should be willing to fulfill, which law was first and which was the consequence of the …show more content…

Suetonius wrote about the life of Cesar Augustus, the emperor of Rome. Suetonius tried to justify his dictatorship to the people of Rome, so that future generations would have no contradictory ideas towards the government. In this way, Rome would maintain peace, and people would follow and take as an example the government of Cesar Augustus as the best of all. The solution of Suetonius was to give a good image to the readers with the actions and facts that the emperor did at that time, “Found it on brick, but left it on marble” (Suetonius,115). Suetonius made the emperor look like a perfect person, who governed rigidly but obtained an efficient and honest administration. He described the emperor as a dictator but who never abused his power. In addition, Suetonius spoke of his good physical condition and his good looks, and that the "only negative thing" of the Emperor Cesar was his disordered hair, and his ordinary clothes.
In conclusion, Cicero and Suetonius faced problems of the old society and created a solution for the people of Rome. Cicero explain that natural law is first and more important than civil law, and Suetonius justify the dictatorship of the emperor Augustus in order to maintain the peace of the future generations of

Show More
Related
793 Words | 4 Pages

The great Empire of Rome, the greatest power to have ruled the Mediterranean. The Roman empire thrived in the time of Julius Caesar around 47 BC. Caesar had made Rome into an empire, but after he died, Rome started its downfall. It was unthinkable. The great Roman empire’s reign was over.

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

The Life of Marius, written by Plutarch, is a fascinating ancient source detailing the career of the Roman Gaius Marius, 127-86BC. While there are interpretive and reliability issues, the Life of Marius is a particularly useful and significant source. It is our only extensive primary source on Marius, who was a key political figure of late Republican Rome. Additionally, Plutarch’s work indicates not only many crucial military and political development in Rome in the time period, but also gives a reflection of Plutarch’s own Rome and its values and political climate.

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

The concept of exemplarity was used extensively throughout Roman literature as a tool to give guidance and enforce authority. By providing an ethical framework of societal precedents, exempla served to govern all facets of Roman public life. The system of exemplarity had an inherent power in Roman society, allowing it to be exploited for personal gain by rulers such as Augustus. Through his monumental literary biography, Res Gestae Divi Augusti, Augustus manipulated exemplarity in order to translate his coercive power into benevolent authority over the people of Rome.

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

Brutus and Cassius are two prominent conspirators in the play Julius Caesar; one of these two fits Aristotle's depiction of a tragic hero. The difference between a normal hero and a tragic hero is that the latter will have a tragic flaw that keeps them from succeeding. These characters are often sympathetic and will cleave to the reader's pity. Firstly, we shall discuss Cassius. He was a man of questionable character.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was a political and military leader whose reign marked the beginning of the Roman Empire and the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar did not always follow the law to get the power that he obtained. Caesar once stated, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power; in all other cases, observe it.” If Caesar saw a way to get power, he took the opportunity even if it meant breaching the law.

Read More
1555 Words | 7 Pages

Cicero also knew that the quality of our lives was fully reliant on the quality of our government. Which supports his doubtfulness of a popular government, that is over-ruling on the people in the community. Cicero also favored term limits so that no one person was in charge for a substantial long period of time. He feared that with a dominant ruler, that they may become over bearing, taking advantage of the system to benefit themselves rather than the people within the community. Cicero had many ideas that are commonly found in governments all over the globe.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

A detailed account of New York society in the 1870s is developed by Edith Wharton through the examination of the different standards that women and men are held to in society. She does this by highlighting the influence of social class on an individual's life. It is said that “Wharton’s major talent was for social observation” (Stuckey 4). She exhibits this talent in this novel by examining how various large events along with minute details can affect societies views. Irony is used to highlight specific characteristics of the people and locations within the novel.

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

4. Political and Law Environment- Titus begins after the death of Rome’s emperor and the citizens of Rome are arguing on which of the two sons should take the throne. Marcus Andronicus,

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

Cicero’s argument about self-interest and the common good can be explained

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Augustine was the man for the job; confronting philosophical questions and provided a spiritual solution that faced the Empire. He argued in “City of God” that Rome was not the Eternal City that everyone thought, but was the City of Man and was just temporary and the City of God was everlasting because was the commander and not Emperors or Kings. On the other spectrum, Aquinas tells his audience in the “Summa Theologica” there are various kinds of law. He tells that there are three kinds of laws. The divine law is the eternal law that comes directly from the will of God which provides structure and ordains the universe to function in the way that it does, the natural law which is the moral order of human beings, and the human law which is the legal/ political order that is derived from the natural law.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar had his flaws, but he was only human. Caesar was seen as a serpent who was ready to strike and create a society that revolved around himself and would keep him at the top. On the contrary, even though the conspirators claim to have had the best intentions of Rome in their conscious and actions when assassinating Caesar, Rome still plunged itself into a civil war that disrupted the peace in the nation. Therefore, was Caesar a menace to society even though he led Rome to victory over Pompey, brought peace and created a sense of nationalism in Rome, and enforced the laws strictly in the case of Metellus Cimber in Act 3, Scene

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

If true, Cicero’s letter provided a large insight into the minds of the higher class and their relationship and views of those in the lower

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

An account written by Suetonius says that “ Caesar urged them rather to propose to the people that he be permitted to stand for a second consulship

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

“If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it”- Julius Caesar, the man who is known as one of the most fascinating political figures of all time. The one who through his military genius, expanded the Roman Republic to include parts of what are now Spain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Belgium. Although the hero had many followers and admirers, he was ultimately stabbed to death by his own fellow politicians. Caesar was born in July, 100 B.C.E to Gaius Caesar and Aurelia. The family claimed a noble history but hadn’t produced many influential people till then.

Read More

More about Marcus Tullius Cicero And Suetonius In Ancient Rome

Related Topics

Open Document