ipl-logo

Marshard V. Grasing Case Summary

350 Words2 Pages

COMPLAINT This matter was opened by bar counsel on January 25, 2017. In or about December 2016, while preparing for hearing on B.B.O. File Nos. C5-14-0055 and C5-16-0008, bar counsel learned that the respondent, Laura Marshard, an assistant district attorney in the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office, had allegedly provided information concerning an ongoing police investigation to the target of the investigation. Bar counsel also learned that Marshard allegedly violated the Rules of Professional Conduct while handling a criminal complaint. If the allegations are supported, Marshard would have violated Mass.R.Prof.C 1.7 (a) and 8.4 (d),(h)&(e). FACTS Grasing matter On October 19, 2011, Edgartown Police Department applied for, received, and executed a search warrant for the home of Gabriel Grasing, located at 27 Thirteenth Street, Edgartown, MA 02539. The search warrant provided Edgartown Police Department permission to search the home for the following: “Illegal Narcotics, Specifically prescription pills Class C, Class E and Marijuana, …show more content…

In addition to law enforcement, several individuals were present in the home during the execution of the warrant including Gabriel Grasing, Jason Willoughby, Allyson Syslo, Edward Motuza, Scott Francis, and Daniel BenDavid. At that time, Grasing, Willoughby, Motuza, and BenDavid were living at 27 Thirteenth Street. Approximately 10 items were seized from the home during the execution of the warrant; eight of these items were taken from Jason Willoughby’s bedroom. All of the items taken were identified as a “green leafy substance,” except for several Suboxone pills taken from BenDavid’s

Show More
Related

P Emilio Serrano Summary

82 Words | 1 Pages

Per NYPD arrest report, P Emilio Serrano observed P Emilio Serrano closing the apartment door on MOS and after MOS gained entry to the apartment P Emilio Serrano ran down the hallway then grabbed MOS and placed himself in between to prevent MOS from arresting. P Emilio Serrano bear hugged MOS and refused to let go. P Emilio Serrano was taken to the ground and placed in a prone position and arrested. A gravity knife was recovered from P Emilio Serrano’s

Read More

Case Study Of Ac. Jaques

247 Words | 1 Pages

All contraband located on Allen was given to Det Sgt Sibley #42 prior to this officer clearing the

Read More

Goldberg And Wheeler Court Case Summary

331 Words | 2 Pages

The court cases Goldberg and Wheeler do not stand for the proposition that only welfare benefits for people in extreme circumstances are entitled to pre-termination hearings. However, this is one situation where cutting off benefits with little or no notice could affect the well-being of the family or person. Any programs that offer they type of assistance people rely on to survive could benefit from pre-termination hearings, not just the welfare program. Welfare is one of the main public assistance programs, although I think housing assistance and food stamps might fall into the welfare category, they are also in need of a pre-termination hearing. In the Goldberg and Wheeler cases, California and New York did not want to give anyone a hearing

Read More

Mapp V Ohio Case Study

182 Words | 1 Pages

The officer forcibly entered the residents and passed Ms. Mapps a blank piece of paper they claimed was a warrant in which she placed in her blouse. A struggle ensued between Ms. Mapps and the officers. Ms. Mapp was arrested and

Read More

The Criminal Wes Chapter Summary

405 Words | 2 Pages

Police got a warrant to search the house where the call was originated. This robber admitted to being

Read More

Compare And Contrast Kelly V Brigett

761 Words | 4 Pages

On january 23rd , at o2r about 0325 hours at the location of 2817 Van Buren street #Apartment 4, ( crime location) which is located within the jurisdictional limits of the city of hollywood, within broward county and the state of florida the above named defendant did commit a battery upon the victim herein identified as ASA Curry. Brigett Kelly did intentionally touch/strike Curry coats against his will to wit; Biting Curry on his left breast and scratching him multiple times on his stomach. Brigett Kelly intentionally caused bodily harm to Asa curry. It should be noted that both Kelly and brigett share a children in common, due to having a past romantic relationship. On the above date and time i responded to the above location in reference

Read More

Summary Of The Olivia Reynolds Case

492 Words | 2 Pages

On Friday, May 26,2017, at 1222 hours, Officer Hudgins and myself, Officer Alexander, responded to a domestic dispute on 3408 Seabass Rd. Upon arrival, both the witness and the suspect were sitting on the front porch. The victim was inside the resident at the time. The parties were brought outside, identified and separated for interviewing. The victim was identified as Olivia Reynolds.

Read More

Legal Case Summary: Plaintiff V.

107 Words | 1 Pages

• Per summons and complaint, plaintiff claims false arrest and excessive force. Plaintiff claims that he was walking on the sidewalk when MOS approached him and asked if he swallowed something. Plaintiff states that informed MOS that he had swallowed a piece of candy then MOS arrested him. Plaintiff states that MOS struck him in the face and body. Plaintiff states that he was taken to Lutheran Hospital.

Read More

Roper V. Simmons Case Summary

1659 Words | 7 Pages

This research paper is on a case study analysis of Roper vs. Simmons concerning the execution penalty on juveniles, by American Supreme Court in 2005. In this case, the Supreme Court was required to execute of a teen, aged 17 during the time the crime was committed. The supreme court of Missouri ruled that the penalty was unusual and cruel. Decision to withdraw the penalty of execution of Chris Simmons supporting that such a penalty to a juvenile criminal is acting against both the 8th and 14th amendments. According to the constitution, the eighth amendment applied to the state, and the fourteenth amendment prohibited the unusual and cruel punishments.

Read More

Gagnon V. Scarpelli Case Brief

777 Words | 4 Pages

In the case, Gagnon v. Scarpelli, respondent Gerald Scarpelli pleaded guilty in July 1965, to a charge of armed robbery in Wisconsin. Therefore, Scarpelli was sentenced to 15 years in prison; however, Scarpelli's sentence was suspended, and he was placed on felony probation for seven years in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Public Welfare. (Leagle, 2017) After signing an agreement specifying the terms of his probation, Scarpelli was awarded a travel permit, which allowed him to return to Illinois, under the supervision of an interstate compact that he resides in Illinois while on probation with the Adult Probation Department of Cook County, Illinois.

Read More

Dollree Mapp Exclusionary Rule Case

530 Words | 3 Pages

They came back a few hours later bringing more officers, and forced their way into her home. Ms. Mapp contacted her lawyer regarding the matter and asked one more to see some sort of warrant allowing them to enter the home. One officer threw up a piece of paper that he claimed was a warrant, Ms. Mapp grabbed it and hid it in her shirt. One officers had forced entry into the home,

Read More

Gratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis

1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More

Armed Attack Case Study

676 Words | 3 Pages

In In the armed robbery, case number, 412268-38, the items collected were a QCS-1 (projectile-floor), QCS-2 (shell casing-floor), QCS-3 (shell casing-floor), QCS-4 (shell casing-floor), QCS-5 (shell casing-floor), and QCS-8 (projectile-floor). In addition to these items, my team and the police conducted a search Geraldine Fredricks’s house. Fredricks is the girlfriend of Ingram. The warrant was issued because a confidential source stated Ingram went to Fredricks’s house after the robbery. As Ingram was suspected to be involved in the unsolved 1989 homicide, items related to the homicide were included in the search warrant.

Read More

Lawrence Vs Texas Essay

1269 Words | 6 Pages

While researching none of the sources stated that the police had a search warrant, rather they just stated the police abruptly entered the home, caught Lawrence and Garner, and proceeded to arrest them. This issue was also never brought up in the courts during the trials which was very odd as well. The second issue was that the enter report of a “weapons disturbance” was false. The person who called reported the disturbance was in fact Lawrence’s neighbor who had a past with Lawrence and had, “been accused of harassing Lawrence” (Urofsky, 2014), and even admitted to lying about the police report.

Read More

Case Report: Momentum Village Apartment 10106

716 Words | 3 Pages

On Sunday 01/28/2018 at approximately 0146 I Officer A. Rodriguez #217 was dispatched to Momentum Village apartment #10106 (located at 7037 Islander Way Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 which is a part of Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi) about an individual that was in apartment 10106 D not a roommate or an invited guest. Upon arrival I activated body camera #3 and knock on the door. An individual by the name of Christopher Potter (student/resident/reporting party) answered the door stating that he heard noise coming from his roommate 's room which is out of town. Potter had called his roommate (later identified as Michael Westerdale (student/resident) via phone to check if it was him which Westerdale told him no and that no one was allowed in his room. Potter stated that there is an individual in

Read More

More about Marshard V. Grasing Case Summary

Open Document