Martin Luther King Jr Vs Mccandless Comparison Essay

476 Words2 Pages

Seeking out simplicity in your lifetime can be a very time consuming goal and is often frowned upon from your peers. If someone doesn't fit into societies’ social expectations they are looked upon as outcasts. Outcasts face criticism from numerous peers, giving them motivation to keep creating their own path to obtain their individual goals in life. Martin Luther King Jr., and Chris Mccandless are two of the largest social and environmental warriors known today. Creating their own pathway of obtaining their goal in some similar ways. Both of these men were very intelligent, Chris finishing school at Emory University with a 3.72 G.P.A., with a degree in history and anthropology, while King acquired a Ph.D in systematic theology, from Boston …show more content…

They also believed that they were born free to explore themselves and society. While these characters were relatively similar in numerous ways, they also differ in many ways. King was part of a group and a movement through his decade, gathering help from others such as; Rosa Parks and Malcolm X. (Biography.com) He was a social reformer pursuing his Jacob Zasada Mr. Moorehouse 6th period career and gathering all the help he could get. Unlike Mccandless who, was not trying to reform anyone, but himself and to get in touch with his position in life itself. He was independent through his journey despite a few warmhearted individuals that Chris couldn't seem to turn away.(Krakauer, 95) Chris was stubborn to say the least, and did not like anyone helping him. While he was on his Alaska trip, he wanted to pave the way of his life by himself, he was not one that liked to take donations. Chris and Martin are widely known in the category of outcasts, rebels, social and environmental warriors, proving to themselves and numerous peers by breaking barrier after barrier without hesitating to stop for