ipl-logo

Comparing Malcolm X's Approach To Change

774 Words4 Pages

Martin Luther King's approach to change is more for peace and optimism than Malcolm X’s approach; however, they both want to motivate blacks through their speeches to resist their own unfair treatment. Martin Luther King Jr. has the same conviction to the audience that even Black and White people can have brotherhoods, black and white can be friends，fight for freedom together and make the country better. King says, “With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day”(1). Martin Luther King’s speech is appealing to people not to use violence，and he urges everyone not to hate whites. Although white people have …show more content…

he wants to win the rights he deserves for his race through violent means. He says, “Let the world know how bloody his hands are. Let the world know the hypocrisy that's practiced over here. Let it be the ballot or the bullet. Let him know that it must be the ballot or the bullet…”(5). Malcolm X's speech is relatively more inclined to use his power to hit the people who created the unequal treaties for him. He wants to tell his people that they are unfairly treated and that they can not wait for the people The power to win for themselves should have the right. Let blacks have the same right to freedom and happiness as whites, equal voting rights and fairness, stop unfair treatment of blacks and make blacks give whites the same social status，make white and black enough to live in peace and equity in the same society. For the Malcom X and Martin Luther King they all mentioned the same analogy in their speeches. they all used seawater as a metaphor for the whites of American society at that time to segregate them. Malcolm X says, “We're all in the same boat and we all are going to catch the same hell from the same man. He just happens to be a white man. All of us have suffered here”(1). And King says, “ One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material

Show More
Related
183 Words | 1 Pages

Since the 18th Century Transatlantic Slave Trade, Africans Americans have been confined to a box full labor, mistreatment, and abuse. Countries all over the world slowly understood that having a skin color other than white does not mean that you are less valuable as a human being. However, in the United States of America the idea of African Americans being equal to whites was unreal. Leaders, such as Martin Luther King, Jr., a Baptist minister, the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and key leader during the Civil Rights Movement after World War II, fought so blacks and whites could coexist and so the future could be brighter even if he was not in it. On MLK’s famous “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” MLK speaks with

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In the speech that shows how Martin Luther King feels about his conflicts says, “ We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. No, no we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream. We hold these truths to be self - evident: that all men are created equal. I have a dream that one day … a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. ... my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin by the content of their character.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

In the 1960, in america during the civil war movement two leaders emerged wanting freedom but both had different views on how to achieve that goal. The first man was Martin Luther King Jr. and believed in more peaceful tactics while the other man Malcolm X believed more of a violent approach and shared his very well observed hate towards mostly the white man. I will be showing you why Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy is the most accurate way to accomplish the goal of freedom thru the works of non violent responses, boycotts, and demanding equality. The first reason was his approach to the white men when they try to harm African Americans or break them down.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

Doc. 4 states, “Negroes and white study side by side in the socially healing context of the classroom” (MLK, “Our God Marching On” Speech, March 21, 1965). This statement shows that Martin Luther King wants all of the people in America to study side by side. To add to this, in Doc 2, “With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together…” (Martin Luther King, I Have a Dream Speech, August 28, 1963).b These go to show that Martin Luther King’s goal was to change the hearts and minds of people through his speeches so that everyone would come together and heal their differences. Meanwhile Malcolm X wanted respect but he focused more on African Americans rather than everyone as a whole during the movement.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Malcolm X is to be considered one of the more famous radicals during the civil rights movement in the United States. In the book The Autobiography of Malcolm X As Told to Alex Haley, the life story of Malcolm X is told and how difficult his life was. Malcolm is the only major character in this book, yes there are other characters and events that contribute to his hatred towards white people. Although Malcolm always on some level hated white people he frequently changes his views during his lifetime. Each different point of life he goes by a different name such as Malcolm Little, Detroit Red, Satan, Malcolm X, and El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

By becoming a scholar one is provided with a plethora of more opportunities and they will not be that thwarted individual who, when they read, felt as if the words were all in Chinese. In this excerpt Malcolm X also seeks to arouse a sense of relatability within his audience. During the late 1900s, the United States was riddled with racism. Malcolm X (1956) recalls an experience that he had in 7th grade United States history class in which the teacher had made a quip regarding Negroes and the classroom resounded with laughter. This allegory would connect to the apparent audience is because many of them have had similar experiences with blatant racism and he evokes a call to action.

Read More
2399 Words | 10 Pages

The narrator’s violent actions are understandable because as Dr. King mentions, “Vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim” (2). When a person is the victim of this kind of hatred it is understandable why is he has bitterness and rage and that he may turn to violence after he experiences of any type of continued

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

He fights back by using examples from history whose actions precipitated violence, like Socrates and Jesus. In addition, he describes the two forces who have responded to the oppression. One force that is drained and has adjusted to segregation, and other force that is full of bitterness, hatred, and frustration, who believe “the white man is an incorrigible devil.” He describes how the pent-up emotions would be released at some point or another and hopes that the white moderates could at least try to understand why the nonviolent protests are so

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

I 'm not here to argue or discuss anything that we differ about, because it 's time for us to submerge our differences and realize that it is best for us to first see that we have the same problem, a common problem, a problem that will make you catch hell whether you 're a Baptist, or a Methodist, or a Muslim, or a nationalist” This reflects an ethos appeal because it shows Malcolm is dedicated to making a change, despite his religion. He also expresses a pathological appeal to portray the actions of the white men against he Black society and to describe what will happen if they don’t use force or an violent approach soon. “If

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

He wanted people to join hands. Martin Luther King wanted people to come together and be able to sit down together at one big table together regardless of their color. (Document B) "sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit together at the table of brotherhood. Martin Luther King wanted all people to come together and join hands well, on the other hand, Malcolm X wanted people to be in their separate groups working with their people. Some people did not agree that all people should come together.

Read More
1974 Words | 8 Pages

Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote from Dr. King shows that getting civil rights and equality isn't just a straightforward thing, instead, It's more complex and needs lots of different groups to work together to make real changes happen. In closing, Dr. King's message of nonviolence and reconciliation was a reminder that change could be achieved

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

The Civil Rights movement led to the emergence of two historical African-American figures during the 1960s, being Martin Luther King Jr. and his rival, Malcolm X. While both men shared a common goal of achieving civil rights for their people, their approaches to reaching this goal were vastly different. Malcolm X advocated for a more confrontational and violent approach, while Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peace and nonviolence. Differing factors such as speed, duration, and tactics separated the two methods from one another. Both were effective in their own ways, though it’s clear that Malcolm X had the stronger approach to the matter. To start things off, it’s clear that Malcolm X’s approach would provide quicker results.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela were two influential figures that have both made a cultural impact on black history. The fact that their lives run parallel further stresses the significance of racial equality. However, they each influenced the world around them with their respective ideologies and beliefs. Their opinions and experiences differed in terms of equality and character throughout their movements. Malcolm X and Nelson Mandela both tried to achieve similar goals of equality but on different paths.

Read More

More about Comparing Malcolm X's Approach To Change

Open Document