Martin Luther's Arguments Against The Use Of Force

1725 Words7 Pages

Identify the scriptural passages that Luther cites which argue for and against the use of force by Christians Martin Luther is known as the most important reformer. Luther expresses his concern of force used by those in power; this includes individuals that hold office at the church and princes. Luther established two key arguments that were fortified by scripture readings to either support or refute the use of force by Christians during the begging of Treaties. The two main arguments that Luther brings forward are the demonstration on secular law as well as the use of force based on God’s will and order. Nevertheless, Luther explains that acts such as vengeance and the use of force from rulers like princes and those that hold the offices pertain to God and not humans themselves. Moreover, in the article it states “Let every soul be subject to power and authority, for there is no power but from God. The power that is everywhere is ordained from God. He then who resists who resists the power resists God’s ordinance. But he who resists God’s ordinance shall bring himself under condemnation” (Romans, 13). This quotation is relevant as it proves that God and not humans themselves dictate the use of force, the sword and secular law. It is noteworthy, that …show more content…

This quote implies the contrary from the quote above. This quote is implying that human that are subject to this power and authority do have the control over the souls of others. Luther is explaining that this is untrue. Luther states later on in the reading that rulers who try and abuse their power by controlling the decisions of others and their souls are seen as rulers who are tyrant. God will punish these individuals as they are trying to do Gods work. It is stated, “He poureth contempt upon princes” (Psalm, 107) this quote is explaining that God nor the people will tolerate a ruler that is trying to control things beyond their