Humans are complex beings with exceptional attributes that no other living being possesses and by the virtue of those qualities, humans are powerful. A particular one is expectation: a deep, secret characteristic of the mind that constructs a view of what is best for our reality based on a collection of beliefs. Society then, associates every situation, every person to their own judgment presuming that is fair. But I disagree on the accuracy of expectations of the character of people. Due to how personal expectation is, categorizing a good or bad person is unreliable; as it is superficial, without analytical considerations of other expectations-which differ from person to person. On one hand, Martin Luther was a religious man who sought for the good of the Catholic community. His beliefs of corruption within the Catholic Church induced him to rebel against religion by allegating in the 95 Thesis every aspect that he disapproved. Those arguments were not considered …show more content…
He suddenly regretted hurting innocent people, he took action and started composing records describing how cruel Spanish were. The purpose of his writings was to present to the Spanish authorities those problems concerning the way conquistadors forced American Indians to labor and religion. Bartolome believed that somehow, the authorities could adjust the procedure when operating in Indian American tribes. Spanish, they all had one goal in America: to be powerful and rich, or at least that is what they thought. Certainly on the eyes of the Spanish conquerors, De La Casas was an egocentric man because his intentions interfered with the goals they determined. Bartolome did not act according to the expectations of Spanish and his character was defined as bad. The interpretations of Spanish did not let them see how good of a man De Las Casas was, trying to demand equality among Europeans and Native