Mary Ray Worley elaborates in her piece “Fat and Happy: In Defense of Fat Acceptance” about her first hand experience in self-love and acceptance of the fat body. She explains the prejudice and ridicule overweight people endure in today’s society and how low self-esteem grows from that negativity. Worley advocates for fat positivity and banishing stereotypes. A stereotype that fat people are lazy and unhealthy is one Worley strongly argues against by citing her own exercise routine and claims obesity is rooted in genetics, not overeating. It is evident that Worley has doubts in the science community and is her article’s shortcoming. Worley builds an emotionally appealing argument for fat acceptance by presenting her personal journey towards self-love, but she criticizes and denies the medical research and findings of obesity, thus weakening her credibility on the subject. Worley’s usage of personal anecdotes created her work an emotionally strong piece of writing. “Fat and Happy: In Defense of Fat Acceptance” is enriched with pathos and strikes a chord in her audience’s heart. She accomplished in advocating the emotional benefits of fat acceptance, which might be all it takes for her audience to join the …show more content…
Medical professionals view obesity as a major problem to fix and do not take into account the criticism and emotional and verbal abuse obese people undergo. For Worley, mental wellbeing trumps the unwarranted advice to lose weight. Perhaps that is why she doesn’t incorporate irrefutable, scientific data in her piece and rather relies on her own understanding. She has the belief that the data can be refuted since, in her eyes, researchers bend their findings to simmer down to lose the weight. Worley’s refusal to thoroughly consider the medical aspect of her argument does conclude her as more of a feelings driven writer than a reliable