Medea Betrayal Analysis

Love is bizarre. It is solid, free, and visually impaired. With it come numerous pleasures. Nonetheless, what frequently happens after adoration is the absolute opposite of affection. When love is lost in a man, a blast of sentiments occupies that individual. One of the darkest, most grounded, most prominent feelings that happen in an individual is the sentiment of revenge. Medea is the daughter of Colchis and granddaughter to Helios, the Sun’s God. She is a woman of incredible intellectual power, ready to manipulate the ones around her, with next to no exertion. She is an intense woman hated driven by her enthusiasm for retribution, which at last causes the passing of her own children. On this essay, I will argue Medea’s actions through a

According to Robert French and Peter Case article, Betrayal and friendship “Both mythology and depth psychology suggest the relationship between friendship and betrayal find origins and may draw their energy from the same deep layers of the human psyche.” (146)In other words, there is a fundamental connection between friendship and betrayal, and both share the same roots. According to the same source, “betrayal too can be experienced as a destructive attack; it strikes at an individual’s deeply held sense of self, leaving them devastated, enraged and bewildered at being treated so unexpectedly and deceitfully or dishonorably.”(147).Namely, betrayal can be seen as a ruinous assault, leading to devastation, enragement, and confusion. Since friendships are based on trust and openness, they are especially vulnerable to betrayal, enlarging the effect of the apparent treachery. Betrayal comprises a unique type of breakdown in a friendship. There is something radical about the phenomenological break that imprints treachery which is absent in friendships that lapse over a more extended timeframe. Each relationship which contains trust contains in itself the potential for betrayal. “The closer the relationship, the greater the potential to become lulled by the possibility of “perfect” trust – amicitia perfecta – and, as a result, the greater the devastation of betrayal.” (Friendship and Betrayal 151) In other words,

Regardless of whether society acknowledges or dazzle itself to this reality, it is an unquestionable truth. Nevertheless, men profoundly disparage the defilement of the human soul. It totally neglects the nearness of the fundamental human nature which blossoms with the control, manipulation, and annihilation of others, for his/her own fulfillment. According to Steve Larocco’s essay Decontextualization, Fantasy, Desubjectification: the Dreamscape of Revenge the aim of revenge is to “assert or reassert dominance, specifically the revenger’s capability of some form of dominance in relation to the target.” (1)Betrayal is perceived as an injury to the self and identity, therefore revenge serves as an interpersonal homeostasis. Along these lines, a demonstration or occasion that disregards a man's control over the symbolic self he relates to, is getting to be desubjectified for two main reasons; “first, it means that the other person has failed to recognize one’s own conception of who one is, and thereby to a greater or lesser extent has violated or disrespected that identity. … Second, such an event expose a given subject’s lack of power to fully control and defend the self-wrought by subjectification.”(5) In other words, one takes revenge in the cases when the others have neglected to perceive how he/she perceives his/herself, and by violating their identity the subject has shown a lack of power and control