Media Influence On Frankenstein

Media have certainly became a big part of our daily life, an important element of our daily viewable culture, and more familiar the violence and monstrosity which is described in it. Audiences barley think about this problem and they also leave aside the consequences of that. Media got a great impact on people’s culture and the way they act now a days, Media is responsible for creating opinions, myths, languages and customs. They can also create uncontrollable monsters; false fantasies and contradictory impact On the exact society for which they engage. Society falls under the mercy of the fast effect of the portrait; it takes a fractional vision of owning in its own hand the capability of telling information; it is controlled by the objective

This problem cannot be solved by standing against television, possibly be stunned from it or be scared and prevent it. We cannot deny its presence or the social incidence that happens. Generally, monsters love children and flowers, also anyone can be friends with monster before wrecking them. So, if we want a clear example on that it would be Frankenstein because as written in the book with the title Monsters, Frankenstein is the Human who developed a creature that lost control but that is not a strong reason to call Dr. Frankenstein a monster. He was that kind of scientists that loved to do hazardous experiments, furthermore, he was a person that likes the nature and had feelings. (Blake 36). Media mirrored an image to the public, that Frankenstein was a viscous monster, so the audience will believe that he is a monster without any kind of feelings, and that will be the misunderstanding that the media shows to audience .If we Compared Frankenstein’s behavior to Dr. Jekyll’s , Frankenstein’s inventor actions were the same because the two of them were thrilled to create the monster which they were working on. Nevertheless, media still represents this process as a monstrosity, because for humans, making a monster is a figure of evil

Media converts the original monster into completely different from what it was in the beginning. The addition and elimination which make the social networks and media, in addition to the exposure to what is subjected the information are not completely real, but an invented story with a little bit of real data. We can assume that sometimes media does not clarify all real facts to the public, when they talk about The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde because in this tale the main character is an ordinary person and a monster , and the media will create its own events for this story. Dr. Jekyll is not completely responsible of his own actions because Hyde makes Jekyll lose control and he cannot do anything against it (Blake 85). On one hand, indicating to the former point, media can tell or explain that Hyde had control over Jekyll, then the Hyde took control of Jekyll and his evil actions start to appear. In opposite of that, media also said that Dr. Jekyll is the person who is responsible about creating the monster, so he should take the blame for this evil invention. After the previous explanation about the two points that the media can make or explain just from one story, we can surely infer that the media is a complex of human