Metro Expresslanes Case Study

1842 Words8 Pages

According to the Metro, Metro gained legislative authority in 2008 with Senate Bill 1422 (Ridley-Thomas) which authorized Metro and Caltrans to convert the HOV lanes (High Occupancy Vehicle) to HOT lanes (High Occupancy Toll) on Interstates I-110 and I-10. These lanes would be what is now called Metro ExpressLanes. The Metro ExpressLanes was a one year congestion demonstration program overseen by Metro, Caltrans, and several other mobility partners joined to develop multi-modal solutions to improve traffic flow and provide enhanced travel options on I-110 and I-10. The project was to reduce traffic and pollution, save traveling time, make our freeways safer and efficient. The project was funded a $210 million dollar grant from the Department of Transportation. On November 10, 2012 I-110 Harbor Freeway Metro ExpressLanes were opened. These lanes would run from Adams blvd to the 91 Freeway. A few months later on February 23, 2013 …show more content…

Some drivers reported that the ExpressLanes were the best thing that ever happened to them because they are able to navigate through congestion more efficiently, others complained it was a scam or a rip-off because Metro was charging them too much on the toll road or over priced them. Some even complained about being fined by Metro. So what is the fine? According to Metro the initial fine is $25.00 plus the toll. But what happens to drivers who are not paying attention to the signs on these freeways and end up on the toll road without a transponder? You will be charged the penalty plus the toll. Some people have reported this has happened to them and they received a high cost bill in the mail. Some even complained they were carpooling and still received a penalty. Apparently there are still some kinks Metro has to work out with the program but for the most part most drivers who drive these interstates long distance will for sure utilize the toll