B 1. In the film, a host named Michael Gillian elaborates on medical practitioners’ uses of various surgical tools in which the Egyptians invented many years ago. Thus, to prove this idea, Mr. Gillian introduces Dr. David Rahimi, a noted surgeon from Los Angeles coming to assist in testing the theory. The information given about him being a “noted” surgeon means that he has a history for himself around the city of LA, thus concluding that he contains experience. Dr. Rahimi places his professional surgical tools next to exact replicas of old Egyptian tools found in Egypt in 2001, comparing the similarities of each with their designs and uses. The doctor verifies that the older tools would function like today’s surgical tools because of their …show more content…
Gillian explanation on how the Egyptians obsidian as a cutting tool like a surgical tool. The film then introduces Dr. Lee Green, a cosmetic surgeon and associate professor at the University of Michigan. The basic information about Dr. Green being a surgeon and a professor in Michigan provides the viewer with proof that he contains experience within the field listed. This is creditable to Dr. Green being knowledgeable about the topic Michael has presented to him. At first, an example shows a microscope that focuses on the obsidian blade, which is smoother than a surgical steel scalpel. Then Dr. Green assists Michael in a demonstration of cutting cultured human skin with both versions of the tools to show which creates a cleaner cut. In conclusion, Michael observes the aftermath of the cuts done to the skin to prove that with the naked eye, obsidian is a smoother, more effective cutting tool used for surgery. Neither Michael Gillian nor Dr. Green makes any personal, emotional comments about how one tool is better than the other. Both individuals just simply explain that one tool is smoother in the incision than the other. Conclusively, the details of the video prove strictly professional information from both