ipl-logo

Michael Rhetorical Analysis

912 Words4 Pages

Some Experts’ Opinions
You might see him on Fox news or maybe shouting in a courtroom, the adjunct professor from Georgetown, Dr. Michael Sheuer, or simply, “Mike”, has major concerns about the way American’s foreign policy has been handled in recent years. The choice isn 't between war and peace. It is between war and endless war , in this age of warfare, the purpose of conflicts that our leaders drag us into, become uncertain as the deaths multiply. Mike has a valid point. During his career running operations in the CIA, the Bin Laden case is a standout, so it is important that people of opposing views at least take a minute to consider his steady, keen outcry against the way American leaders deal with foreign allies. Mike may be filled with …show more content…

Obviously, Mike is honestly anxious about something. He believes our strategy with regards to Israel and Saudi Arabia, is becoming excessively unfruitful. “I’d dump the Israelis tomorrow”, he reasons that the only way towards fixing the issue of misinforming the public about the costs of war (dead Americans) is through breaking ties with Israel and deserting Saudi Arabia. People do not agree with women’s rights so let them be. Interventionism is not so far off from something like the tyrannical nature of bullies around the middle school playgrounds of the United States, poking around in other people’s business, reminiscent of authoritarian leaders of the past. Democracy spreading in the Middle East is counterintuitive and according to Mike, it does no benefits to intervene any longer. He believes that intervening in other countries problems, motivates a sensitive group, the Muslims all around the globe, into triggering unfortunate actions like shooting up a nightclub. Why he believes this concept, is explained through six notions; U.S. support of Israel, support of dictatorship in the Middle East, inhabiting of the Arabian Peninsula, Israelis escalating, reliance on inexpensive oil, military presence in other countries in the “Muslim world”, and lastly, our unfair disposition to categorize as terrorist, any Muslim population that one of our allies (Russia or China) dislikes. Above all else, the self-appointed duty of America, as the democratic police of the world, has ironically become our Achilles

Show More
Related
187 Words | 1 Pages

Sidoonie smith and Julia Watson rhetorical situation, is that “people tell stories of their lives through the cultural scripts available to them”. Another situation is the fact people have a discursive practice of how they control the stories they tell about themselves. Claims made are the fact that people don’t really know that much about themselves when writing an autobiography. For this reason Sidoonie smith and Julia Watson explain to the audience how individuals use the concept of agency to tell stories about themselves and ways to do it. Sidoonie smith and Julia Watson use varies contexts of autobiography that is better interpreted and understood.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

The United States required a moral authority to justify militarization and intervention in a war that was not being fought on American soil. That moral authority was granted by the nation’s political leadership to defend democratic values globally, not just in the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt claimed that the defense of “freedom and democratic values” now depended on U.S. leadership (Document

Read More
157 Words | 1 Pages

In recent discussions of trumps airstrike, a controversial issue has been whether or not Trumps strike was warranted. On the one hand, Author Tom Smith argues that the syrian strike was a good thing. From this perspective Smith assumes Trump is taking a step in the right direction. On the other hand, however, Author Aldan Heir argues that the syrian strike was illegal. In the words of Heir, one of the view’s main proponents,” These airstrikes are clearly illegal.”

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

He goes into depth and great detail about this Al-Qaeda affiliate’s story. If readers do not know anything about the process of catching a bombmaker, Mr. Dillow’s writing allows them to be greatly informed. This article appeals to anyone who is interested in Government operations, and Science. This piece of writing is very well written. Proper

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of Mike Rose Emotional, ethical, and logical appeals are all methods used in writing to perused you one way or another on various topics. Mike Rose used all of these techniques in this essay, to show how student who are pushed aside, distracted, or fall behind and fail. In this essay Rose describes that students who have teachers who are unprepared, or incompetent majorly contribute to student failure. He is trying to show that many children have potential that is overlooked or sometimes even ignored, by authority.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

You've likely seen celebrity trainer Jillian Michaels putting people through rigorous workouts to lose weight but when it comes to shedding pounds, Michaels says diet is more important than exercise. In fact, she says it's critical. "You can eat your way through any amount of exercise. There are those great little factoids online that put this in perspective. For example, 1 small fries is equivalent to 30 minutes on the treadmill.

Read More
1380 Words | 6 Pages

The Editorial Board argues that the escalating American military forces in the Syrian war will only result in the U.S. being sucked into a war in the Middle East. The authors adds that the current administration has little legal framework or strategy for dealing with the Islamic State with even no declaration

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Jingoism entwined with governmental policy and “a majority…of Americans…grant[ing] spontaneous consent to foreign policy militancy” influence policies related to foreign and national security in the United States.1 The European history of colonialism and imperialism impacted the development of foreign policy and national security. In Culture, National Identity, and the “Myth of America,” Walter L. Hixson leniently criticizes American foreign policy, while advocating for a more “cooperative internationalism. ”2 Melvyn P. Leffler in National Security, Core Values, and Power fails to formulate evidence for national security policies reflection of America core values. In reference to foreign and national security policy, both Hixson and Leffler

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

I agree with this view that he holds, and I believe that our class discussions also have aligned with this view. The greatest threat that transnational terrorist networks and extremist groups pose to our nation is their ability to exploit the politics and economy of their state. This not only strengthens the recruitment and organization of such groups, but it also provides financial assistance to their cause, granting them weapons, defense, and greater technological capabilities. As discussed in class, such groups become dangerous once they develop the ability to compete with the U.S. Whether that be through be having the financial means to influence spies, the technological means to develop weapons, or the political means to expand propaganda across a state, development within extremist groups poses a serious issue to the U.S. The intelligence community must utilize their capabilities to focus on eliminating such exploitations by enemy groups.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Some believe the United States is responsible to stop the war and suffering in foreign counties. Others think the U.S. should avoid foreign situations unless they threaten the homeland. Either way, the morale and physical responsibilities fall in the hands of the government (Relin, 1990). The U.S. has a long history of intervening in faraway conflicts that pose no immediate threat to American

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

A debate that has plagued American society is whether the United States, with its immense militaristic and economic power, has a moral obligation to intervene in cases of tyranny or extreme humanitarian crises. In “The American Century,” Henry Luce argues that America has such a duty and advocates for intervention to fight Nazi tyranny and spread democratic ideals. Many continue to argue for such humanitarian intervention today in cases like Syria and ISIS, but others have an opposing view. For example, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed concern when the United States debated intervening in Syria in “A Plea for Caution.” Putin contends that intervention in Syria and American interventionism in general is often immoral, and many share

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

Atkins, a writer and editor for a great deal of academic works, discusses nearly everything a person would ever need to know about the tragic events of September 11th 2001. This work shows how terrorist organizations such as Al Qaeda and ISIS can grow into something deadly. Blakemore, Brian, and Imran Awan. Extremism, Counter-Terrorism and Policing.

Read More
2861 Words | 12 Pages

He spoke about how the U.S. has destroyed al Qaeda training camps and disrupted their central operations and means of funding those operations and that through these efforts, the U.S. “has transformed al Qaeda (AQ) from a strong hierarchy that plans and executes attacks to being a decentralized and amorphous group. Unfortunately, while AQ may be weakened, it is not dead. The convergence of globalization and technology has created a new brand of terrorism. Today, terrorist threats may come from smaller, more loosely-defined individuals and cells who are not affiliated with al Qaeda, but who are inspired by a violent jihadist message. These homegrown terrorists may prove to be as dangerous as groups like al Qaeda, if not more

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

War is nothing new to Americans, and it is deeply rooted into her culture. In recent times, with the development of advanced technology, the American civilians have come to understand the truth about their government’s involvement in war, and the lie that's been lead on for far too long. To use as an example, take the strife in the Middle East, decades spent fighting the anti-American ideal and terrorism. The war has cost countless lives, both civilian and military, and finds its root in the fact that the terrorist organizations hate Western freedom and democracy, or does it? This paper outlines American exceptionalism as applied to the middle eastern conflicts, and how the problem originated, why it continues, and why these terrorist organizations do what they do.

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Award winning writer, George Orwell, in his dystopian novel, 1984, Winston and O’Brien debate the nature of reality. Winston and O’Brien’s purpose is to persuade each other to believe their own beliefs of truth and reality. They adopt an aggressive tone in order to convey their beliefs about what is real is true. In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston and O’Brien use a variety of different rhetorical strategies and appeals such as parallel structure, pathos, and logos in order to persuade each other about the validity of memories and doublethink; however, each character’s argument contains flaw in logic. Winston debates with O’Brien that truth and reality are individual and connected to our memories.

Read More

More about Michael Rhetorical Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document