ipl-logo

Mountain Gravel Case Summary

907 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on equal protection clause

Adarand Constructors Inc. put in a low bid to Mountain Gravel for a construction job. Mountain Gravel was given a contract from the Department of Transportation. Gonzalez Transportation Company was chosen instead. Gonzalez Transportation was owned by Hispanic- American’s. Mountain Gravel made the decision because of the Small Business Act. Under the Act it was federal policy to boost subcontracting to disadvantaged people. The Act specified that disadvantaged people include those who were racially or ethnically discriminated against in the past. The Act created a goal for 5 percent of all subcontracts to go to these individual’s companies. The Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987, said 10 percent of, “appropriated …show more content…

Law currently allows “intermediate scrutiny” for gender discrimination and “strict scrutiny” for discrimination based on race. This idea allows government to create affirmative action programs for women more easily than for minorities even though the Equal Protection Clause original purpose was to protect slaves from discrimination. A Court fixated on abstract principles is in danger of ignoring common sense. The Court’s idea of “congruence” means a Congressional affirmative action program and state affirmative action program are the same. Important differences are completely disregarded. In Metro Broadcasting, the Court sustained a program meant to make broadcasting more diverse. The Court recognized the “special competence” of Congress. In Fullilove several opinions were written stating the Congress needs to be looked at as a more equal branch. Congress creates legislation aimed at creating equal protection. In Croson, Justice O’Connor wrote about the difference between Congress and state governments. Justice O’Connor wrote that Congress has the specific constitutional responsibility to administer laws pertaining to the Fourteenth Amendment. Federal affirmative action programs embody the whole countries elected officials. State programs may have an effect on nonresidents. Citizens may feel the effects of “race-conscious programs,” …show more content…

The Court has recognized that the laws at the center of this case deal with the consequences of racism against minority races. The idea of equality among races has been ignored for most of this country’s history. Plessy v. Ferguson (1967) did not just uphold segregation, but even the dissenting Justice Harlan acknowledged that whites are superior. Loving v. Virginia (1967) is the first case where it was certain that the Constitution and the Court would not hold one race superior to the other. The Court acknowledges racial inequality and Congress’s right to “act affirmatively” to prevent discrimination and its effects. Still similar people applying for the same job still may be treated differently based on their race. Minorities may have a difficult time finding housing because of prejudices held by landlords, real estate agents, and mortgage lenders. Minority business owners sometimes cannot secure contracts despite having the highest bid. Affirmative action may fulfill the Fourteenth Amendment’s idea of equal protection. The precedent from this case will still need to develop (O’Brien

Show More
Related
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Notаbly absent from the opinion, as it was in Plessy, is any citаtion to a Supreme Court cаse that considered whether the prаctice of segregating schools was a violation of the Fourteenth Аmendment. It was an open question for the Court. The Court аdmitted that the precedent to which it cited involved discriminаtion between whites and blacks rаther thаn other rаces. However, the Court found no аppreciable difference here—"the decision is within the discretion of the state in regulating its public schools, and does not conflict with the Fourteenth Аmendment."

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No.14-981. Transcript of Gregory G. Garre Esq’s oral argument on behalf of the Respondent. Pg.51, lines 10-13, & Pg.55, lines 7-9: Back in 2002, from a class of 8,000, there were only 272 black students enrolled; 90% of the time, it is typical for a normal size classroom of to have zero to one African American student. Id. General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. agrees that in the event of two applicants’ criteria are exact alike, their race factors does “not necessary” matter in the admission office’s decision making. “The increasingly fierce competition for the decreasing number of seats available for Texas students outside the top 10% rule results in minority students being under-represented, and

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Myra Bradwell wanted to become a lawyer in Illinois and had all the requirements yet when she applied, the state court declined her application because she was a women. Then the supreme court ruled that Illinois did not violate the 14th Amendment because the right to be a lawyer is not one of the privileges protected by this Amendment. These cases represent something further than just the court decisions they embody the general Americans opinion towards equality. Obviously they wanted segregation at the time because they jumped on the opportunity to do so. But for women, they prevented one from being able to work in “male” profession but continued to fight for their rights and eventually reach equilibrium.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

The case shows that there is in fact racial discrimination in the American Criminal Justice system and that the system itself has honestly admitted that it is flawed. It illustrates that the system still needs to be scrutinized when it comes to convicting people of color and that America still does not treat everyone equally as its laws claim. This decision will produce several more appeals by individuals who feel that they may have been convicted based upon their skin color and may lead to several convictions

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

Erica Beckman Duran English 1A 28 October 2015 Affirmative Action In Chapter Seven of Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? , Beverly Tatum discusses affirmative action, an action that guarantees equal opportunity to all individuals, regardless of any circumstances (117). Tatum remarks on the history of affirmative action, in which it was introduced to language and our legal system by executive order 11246 by President Lyndon B. Johnson (1965), and obligated federal contractors to “take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, religion, sex, or national origin” (116-117).

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Constitutional decision makers chose to stay on par with the majority opinion, and advanced the rights of middle and lower class white men’s rights the most. This reflected the prioritization of white males who did not own property, as they attained voting and other democratic rights not held previously. Meanwhile, the same constitutional decision makers restricted the rights of racial minorities and women. By choosing to not be perceived as legislators, the court limited its own

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

Public colleges and universities in the United States use a variety of factors to determine which students will be accepted. Universities often want a student body with diverse academic interests, talents, and backgrounds. They consider factors such as applicants’ grades, standardized test scores, community service, athletic or musical ability, and geographic location. Sometimes, universities also consider an applicant’s race or ethnicity. This case is about whether the University of Texas-Austin’s admissions policies violate the Fourteenth Amendment and its guarantee of equal protection.

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

The ruling thus lent high judicial support to racial and ethnic discrimination and led to wider spread of the segregation between Whites and Blacks in the Southern United States. The great oppressive consequence from this was discrimination against African American minority from the socio-political opportunity to share the same facilities with the mainstream Whites, which in most of the cases the separate facilities for African Americans were inferior to those for Whites in actuality. The doctrine of “separate but equal” hence encourages two-tiered pluralism in U.S. as it privileged the non-Hispanic Whites over other racial and ethnic minority

Read More
76 Words | 1 Pages

The U.S. Supreme Court is affirmed by ruling in favor of Ferguson ruling that mandatory racial segregation was not in violation of the 14th Amendment. During the court appeal the term “separate, but equal was never used; therefore, the court’s ruling was able to established that principle as a means of justifying segregation. The stamp of approval was placed on the doctrine of “separate but equal” because Homer Plessy’s 13th and 14th Amendment arguments were rejected.

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

At least four Supreme Court justices believe that affirmative action is unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts has said that “the way to stop discriminating on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race”. This viewpoint offers no differentiation between “race consciousness” and “racism”, but is a quite common opinion. This sort of viewpoint is what may drive America towards class-based rather than race-based affirmative action. Because of the disparities in income and wealth, minorities are as likely as whites to benefit under a class-based policy.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

If the equitable measure at the core of the program is constructed on the needs of the American instead of the race of the American, then the ostensible hurdle regarding Affirmative Action has been solved. What we would then have is a solution that aids the individuals that make up the melting pot of American society that are at a disadvantage, regardless of biological or cultural difference. In today’s world, economical oppression makes us similar. This reform to Affirmative Action is compensation based on the individual, instead of on focused groups, as it was when it was created, which also speaks to the idealistic fibers we find in the Constitution. Justice will still play a part in identifying where fair share is needed the most because the focus on the individual will highlight the people that are at a

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

In 1891, a group of concerned young black men of New Orleans immediately formed the “Citizens’ Committee to Test the Constitutionality of the Separate Car Law.” They raised money and engaged Albion W. Tourgée, a prominent Radical Republican author and politician, as their lawyer. The poeple involved in this case are the young concerned black men the us government and the states. On May 15, 1892, the Louisiana State Supreme Court decided in favor of the Pullman Company’s claim that the Separate Car Law was unconstitutional. The importance of this case is that In 1883, the Supreme Court finally ruled that the 14th Amendment did not give Congress authority to prevent discrimination by private individuals(Plessy v.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

At the heart of affirmative action programs is the idea of fairness. After centuries of slavery, decades of oppressive Jim Crow laws, and staggering inequality of opportunity, some Americans began to understand that the second-class status and marginalization of African-Americans was incompatible with the American ideals of equality and democracy. In order to make up for these past injustices, these liberals believed that preferential treatment in employment and educational opportunity for the disadvantaged was the fair, and right thing to do. Affirmative action, the policy of favoring disadvantaged groups who have been discriminated against, was thus born from the idea of fairness. Many Americans, however, did not view affirmative action in

Read More
1207 Words | 5 Pages

Affirmative action policies command attention because they tap into basic debates about fairness. As a nation, we say we are committed to fairness, but our history of achieving fairness for all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity or gender, has been far from perfect. Any policy that reminds us of the difference between

Read More
1734 Words | 7 Pages

This is the next and more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity––not legal equity but human ability––not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and as a result” (Garrison-Wade & Lewis, 2003). That same year, President Johnson signed an executive order mandating government contractors “take affirmative action” in

Read More

More about Mountain Gravel Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document