- Great execution of the strong close! Opportunities: - Relevant and effect LJN's. Judy notes the reason for the client's call, but does not
1. The Case Osland v R was a matter appealed to The High Court of Australia from The Supreme Court of Victoria. The matter involved Heather Osland (as seen right) one of the accused, her son David Albion the other defendant and their husband/stepfather Frank Osland the victim. The Victorian director of public prosecutions on behalf of the Queen conducted the prosecution, and was the respondent in this appeal. Heather was convicted of murder.
SC, Jennifer Stoker contacted provider, Latonia Jennings via telephone. SC introduced herself and told provider that she was Barry’s SC. SC asked how Barry is doing towards his outcome of wanting his health monitor. Latonia noted the nurse is monitoring his health. There has been no issue and he staff monitor his health daily to insure he remains health.
Officer Perez reports being dispatched to a disturbance at 11 Langton. Perez arrived on scene and met with Ann Mcelroy that stated she lost her phone and found that 2 kids had possession of the phone and was able to get the phone returned to her. Mcelroy stated she wanted to make a report of her phones information had been erased and was concerned of any personal information that was possibly had been taking prior to her getting her phone back. Perez had Mcelroy complete a witness statement form.
The Owen Labrie Case Police When the young girl was assaulted on May 30, 2014, she did not come forward right away. She waited a while. This young woman then called her mother sobbing, so the mother went to the school immediately and figured the situation out. Not only were the police investigating the possible assault, but they were also looking at the ritual that these boys had planned for so many years (Shworm, 2015). The senior boys at St. Paul High School would try to have sex with younger girls, particularly freshmen, before they graduated.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie and Fitch Stores is a case about Samantha Elauf. Samantha Elauf is a Muslim teenager who lives in the country of freedom and being known for its freedom. A Lot of refugees and immigrants come to this country to feel and to be treated different from where ever they come from and that is by practicing their religion, no racism, to speak what in their mind without going to jail and to be a part of great country. Samantha Elauf is an American Muslim teenager who is like most of teenagers after the age of sixteen they start looking for a job to support her in her senior a year and the beginning of her college years. Samantha as a Muslim she wears the headscarf or the “hijab” and she wear the “hijab” because of her religion requirements.
Dr. Stout’s failure to specifically allege wrongdoing by Health Management precludes recovery under any of the causes of action set forth in the Amended Claims. Accordingly, dismissal is appropriate. Dr. Stout agrees or alleges that the Practice, the Statesville HMA, LLC (“the Hospital”), and Health Management are three separate, distinct corporate entities, as follows: (1) the Practice “is a North Carolina Limited Liability Company in good standing with the North Carolina Secretary of State” ; (2) the Hospital “is a limited liability company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with its principal place of business in Iredell County, North Carolina” ; and (3) Health Management “is a corporation, duly
If found guilty, a judgment will be given by the judge and in most courts, the decision will be read out loud. But sometimes, there will be another court date that will be set due to numerous reasons. (e.g. time has elapsed, further reviewing for verdict needs to be made, etc.) Heather Raftery case was a capital murder case where the death penalty was pretty much involved until the court changed the charges to Robbery 1 and Burglary 1. Let's say the charges were not lowered, then Raftery would be granted death penalty or spending life in prison without parole.
Melissa Calusinski was a normal girl living in a town outside Chicago with her parents, Paul and Cheryl. Melissa had no criminal background, she was known as a kind and caring girl who always put everyone above herself. When she was offered to work with her sister Crystal at a nearby childcare center, she instantly knew that working with children was her passion and that this is what she was meant to do (Moriarty, 2016). Ever since the age of 22, she has worked as a teacher’s assistant at that facility. While working her shift on the 14th of January, Melissa noticed that one of the children, Benjamin Kingan (known as Ben), was ill after laying him down on the floor to crawl around.
On Friday, November 4, 2016, at approximately 0649 hours, I Officer M. Alfaro was dispatched to 2713 Roosevelt Avenue in reference to a disturbance. Upon arrival, I Officer Alfaro was able to observed broken glass and blood in front of the residence. I was also able to see that the front glass door was broken. As I walked to the front door, I announce my presence and the complainant, later identified as Cora Whitfield DOB: 9/28/1970 came out.
Case or Issue Overview A woman’s body was discovered floating in the pool located in the apartment building she owned and lived in. Police questioned all of the current tenants. All of them were cleared of suspicion except for Ella Rogers, a 23-year-old publicist. After further investigation, police found some evidence that contradicted her alibi.
Dr. Califf, 64, is a cardiologist and clinical trial expert from Duke University who has been a consultant to drug companies and ran a research institute that received a majority of its funding from the industry. Such ties have raised questions among some public health groups and some Democrats that he is too close to the industry he is being called on to regulate. Many medical experts dispute that, saying that industry is a principal funder of research in the United States and that working with companies does not present an inherent conflict. Dr. Califf said as much during his two-hour hearing. The session, before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, was largely friendly, but was punctuated with skeptical questions from Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, and Bernie Sanders, the independent from Vermont who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination.
The principles of the best interest of the child in Canadian immigration proceedings are reinforced in the case of Baker v. Canada. When Mavis Baker’s application for permanent residence was refused, and she received a deportation order, she proceeded with a judicial review of her application (Baker v. Canada, 1999). The findings at the conclusion of this case have direct implications for the assessment of permanent residence applications under the humanitarian and compassionate category, and the considerations of the best interests of the child. As stated in s. 25(1) of Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a child whose interests will be directly affected must be taken in to account during the assessment of a humanitarian and compassionate application (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2016). Baker v. Canada further reinforces these principles as the Federal Court of Appeal determined that the best interests of Mavis Baker’s children needed to be considered in order for the ruling to be fair, and that “the decision maker should consider children’s best interests as an important factor, give them substantial weight, and be alert, alive and sensitive to them” (Baker v. Canada, 1999, para.
What if there was a law that could minimize, even stop all mass shootings eventually? “Laura’s Law was named for 19-year-old Laura Wilcox, who was killed in 2001 by a psychiatric client at a clinic in Nevada City. The state passed Laura’s Law in 2002 but left it up to counties to choose to implement it. For a while, only Nevada County did” (Dembosky 2). Laura’s death affected many, causing people to feel obligated to stop it from happening to anyone else.
“Riverside Pediatric Associates” Case Study Week 15 Questions and Answers Kellie R. Fowler Terra State Community College “Riverside Pediatric Associates” Case Study Week 15 Question and Answers Question 1. Assume you are Sanchez or Hudson and plan to implement immediate organizational change within the practice. Where would you start? What steps would you take? Daft, R. L. (2014).
