ipl-logo

Ms. Eifert Case Summary

321 Words2 Pages
Mr. Kurtz: The Union Understands that Ms. Eifet was a probationary employee and her termination under Article 5 Section 2 cannot be disputed. What I'm seeking here is clarification about her termination and hope you could provide that, the case as I know it is as follows: On or about 3/8/18 Ms. Eifert filed a complaint with her supervisor Alika Gaceta with a response from Mr. Hartman on 4/6/18 explaining that there was not enough evidence to sustain the allegations of her complaint. Ms. Eifert then filed the complaint with your office with the understanding that she would have a reply on or about the first week in May. When Ms. Eifert inquired about the status of her complaint on or about April 30 she was informed that you were on Vacation

More about Ms. Eifert Case Summary

Open Document