Appealing to the sympathetic emotions of his audience, he nevertheless, mentions the numerous and plentiful patriotic acts of immigrants, of which the native-Europeans would not do due to their laborious nature, “they do the hard work that native-born Americans dislike” (3). Speaking out at this time of prejudice in order to to clarify any misconceptions about immigrants, “ as patriotic as native born in offering the supreme sacrifice”. (4) In his speech Clancy, furthermore elaborates on how he relates to the immigrants affected by the Quota Act of 1921, with his first hand experience. Addressing any relating audience members, he pursues them to think of their own family lineage of which definitely has immigrant blood, if they are actual American’s at this time period, “my own family were all hyphenates” (5).
The first primary sources discusses the author’s thought on colored immigrants over taking the white Americans. The author was worried about the “complexion of his country” that the immigrants would give. The second primary source addresses the issues of Chinese immigrants not wanting to adopt the American way of living. They did not want to learn a new language, nor leave their culture or their religion.
The right to movement opens doors for unrestricted movement, and global human movement (better known as immigration) has been a controversial topic for the past centuries. In David Miller’s essay titled “Immigration: The Case for Limits”, Miller argues for restrictions on immigration. His central argument is that even if a prospect immigrant wants to emigrate to a state, the state is not obligated to let the immigrant in. Meaning that even if there are reasons to permit unrestricted immigration, the reasons are not compelling enough to defend immigration. Miller argues that a nation can be morally justified in closing its borders if it wishes to.
He talks about the life of Angel Espinoza, a Mexican illegal immigrant and brings up his own own grandfather who was an Irish immigrant. Tierney argues that Hispanic immigrants are simply trying to achieve the American dream for themselves and their descendants, just as the Irish did. In the 7th paragraph it says, “It’s been argued that Mexicans are different from past immigrants because they’re closer to home and less likely to assimilate. Compared with other immigrants today, they’re less educated, and their children are more likely to get poor grades and dropout of school. Therefore, the arguments goes, Mexicans are in danger of becoming an underclass living in linguistically isolated ghettos.”
In the Article "Trump's Muslim Immigration Ban Should Touch off a Badly Needed Discussion," published in The National Review, Andrew McCarthy's thesis is that if the United States continues to treat Islam as just a religion, and doesn't acknowledge the difference between sharia and constitutional rule; then they will not simply coincide with each other and the immigration policy will never work. McCarthy's brings up three main points in his article that explain the problems of the immigration ban. First, McCarthy states that Islam is not just a religion. It is a system that demands its followers to live their lives under sharia rule and has no separation between church and state. Second, McCarthy says the US has no reason to not enforce a Muslim
He elaborates on this, explaining to readers that for immigrants, this is The structure of “Family Values” is
Response to “Our Fear of Immigrants” In “Our Fear of Immigrants” Jeremy Adam Smith takes a neutral stance on the immigration and anti-immigration argument. Smith begins by telling the story of a 4th grade class at Jefferson Elementary School in Berkeley, California who try to fight back against immigration laws after a classmate of theirs was deported back to his home country. Smith then goes on to compare the 4th graders to the adults of their town who fight for stronger immigration laws asking his readers what qualities the children possess that the rest of the citizens do not to make them react so differently.
Quindlen and Kennedy expressed musings that were somewhat similar. “... there is a grudging fairness among the citizens of the United States that eventually leads most to admit that…the new immigrants are not so different from our own parents or grandparents.” Here Quindlen states that though reluctantly for some, most
One specific piece of information that author used in this section for logos was “Any newcomer represents a threat to the person who has power” (Smith 753). By using logos, the author was able to branch off and provide more information about why immigrants are perceived as a threat, allowing for his argument to improve. In addition to providing factual evidence within the text, Jeremy Smith gives the reader an emotional point of view, ethos. The author had not used a sufficient amount of pathos within this section; however, he had a few statements that appealed to the emotions. Within the article on page 754, he writes, “Horror over tens of thousands of children crossing the border without their parents transmutes into fear and repulsion, because many native-born Americans despair of being unable to help them.”
" This quote gives a deeper explanation of Americanization and demonstrates another thing immigrants went through when they first came to
He states that immigration form is really impossible, but brings up an idea that the best way to deal with the immigrants is with love and compassion. In conclusion, we can say immigration presents a far more positive image of the impact of immigration on American Society. They help in the development of the nation and make life in the USA better and fulfilling for both natives and new arrivals. America should be attacking the root of the problem rather than the immigrants.
He refers to Mexican Immigration as “Challenge for our policies” (Huntington 171). He talks about how Immigration has important for this country, but also how the Mexican population has exceeded more than any other race of immigrants in the past few years. He mentions that Mexican immigration is different from any other kind of Immigration, and what makes them different is their contiguity and persistence. He describes and shows evidence about five different characteristics that makes the Mexican Immigration special and unique. Like for example how they don’t cross miles of oceans to get here like others immigrants do, but instead they do often cross by land due to the fact that them borders are connected.
In a series of rhetorical questions, he asks if an immigrant can call a country that met him with nothing but “the frowns of the rich [and] the severity of the laws” (11) his homeland. The way these questions were included vividly illustrate his point that there is reason for an immigrant continuing to
“The American story is a story of immigration. I would be the last person who would say immigrants are not important to America.” — Phil Graham, circa 1960. This quote may be from the mid-20th century, but it keeps its significance with the everlasting controversy on immigration and immigration laws. However, this is not the only time that the United States has experienced immigration controversies.
Over the past few years, anyone can tell you that religious importance in our country has become less, and less vital. Recent events like the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City, New York, and the attacks on Paris, France, have made the freedom of religion harder and harder to come by. Having the free practice of religion has proved difficult. Christianity has suffered from these issues as the general acceptance of the religion has declined substantially in the few decades. A recent poll there was a sense of discrimination for the Islamic religion, as they have been responsible for the attacks, 8/10 Americans believe Christianity should be practiced freely, while only a mere 6/10 Americans think the Muslims should practice freely (Source #3).
