ipl-logo

Negative Effects Of Roman Conquests

426 Words2 Pages

UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE HIST 1421GREEK AND ROMAN CIVILIZATION Learning Journal Task Unit 6 Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests. As we have learned from the reading for unit 5 that the chief effects of the conquest was to transform Rome from the greatest conquering people of the world , to the greatest governing people of the world (Morey, 1901), this sounds both positive and negative an the same time. Despite the success on the part of the Romans, it conquest were no doubt negative too. According to Morey (1901), he stated that:- By their conquest, Romans came to be ambitious, to love power for its own sake, and to be oppressive to their conquered subjects. He also noted that, as Rome was plundering foreign countries, they also come to be avaricious (grasping), to love wealth more than honor, to indulge in luxury, and to despise the simplicity of the fathers (Morey, 1901). When Rome was bringing foreign nations under her command, she was indebted to them, and to create a system of law by which they could be governed. …show more content…

As Romans conquered more and more lands, they forced people captured in war to work as slaves on the latifundia. By the last days of the republic, around a third of Italy’s people lived in slavery. The widespread use of slave labor hurt small farmers, who were unable to produce food as cheaply as the latifundia could. Many farmers fell into debt and had to sell their land. In despair, landless farmers flocked to Rome and other cities looking for jobs. There, they joined an already restless class of unemployed people. As the gap between rich and poor, widened, angry mobs began to

Open Document