In all three stories, there are many different points of views on slavery, In the story of “no compromise with the evil slavery”, written by William Lloyd Garrison, he believes that all men should be treated equal. In the story of “the Mudsill theory”, written by James Henry Hammond, there are two different points of views. One that wants to get rid of slavery. In the story of “Abraham Lincoln’s house divided ”, Lincoln wants to get rid of slavery in both north and south. In the story of “no compromise with the evil slavery”, written by William Lloyd Garrison, he believes that all men should be treated equal. In the story it states” no compromise with slavery! LIberty for each, for all, forever!”. It also states “ the law that makes him a chattel, is to be trampled underfoot”. As the Author is making his point going throughout the story, he is adding dramatic effect by stating “If they are men” and “if they are men”. …show more content…
Garrison believes that “ In all social systems, there must be a class to do the menial duties”, and we use them for our purpose, and call them slaves. In the story it states “ I will not characterize that class at the north by that term”, meaning he does not believe that a man should be a slave for the own use of others. Hammond believes that slaves should not be white by “ Law or necessity” . In the story it states “ none of that race on the whole face of the globe can be compared with the slaves of the south”. Hammond believes that slave’s, are meant to work until