No warrant should be needed for search and seizures
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God."
Matthew 5:9 In this essay I will write about no warrant should be needed for search and seizure, to begin let me explain you what is a warrant. Also, in my personal opinion I believe that for you to have an opinion of this type of this topic we have the duty to research if the people involved with this method have rights and if there's a law behind this. The definition of warrant ,is a legal order signed by a judge authorizing the police to search specific locaiton and seize specific materials from that location at a specified time. Throughout the years, we have noticed at movies, TV shows and news the way the police arrest the "bad guys". Obviously we had
…show more content…
After he suspects, the next step is to confiscate any suspicious material and personal belongings. A lot of people complain about this confiscation method because they believe or in their personal opinions you shouldn't judge anyone. Although, in some countries you are judged by your exterior look, which means the clothes you are wearing, if you have tattoos or piercings. For example in Honduras, we can easily identify a person who belongs to a gang. It is unbelievable that in our country that for people to recognize the murderers, in the news like Canal 6, Televicentro and Canal 11, they make live so the people can identify them,the police tell them to get on their knees, then they lift up their shirt and show the audience their tattoos, so people can have they possibility to identify them. This tattoo thing have become an argument throughout the years, nowadays a lot of things have changed in the way we think or visualize things, I truly believe that is like a "modern" renaissance for example, now people argue that you shouldn't be judged if you have a tattoo that doesn't mean you are part of a gang. So, as I've been writing some examples of